Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
(A) The members of the board shall base
their decisions on any matter subject to hearing only on the evidence of
record. No information acquired by a member of the board in any way other than
by review of the evidence of record shall be considered by such member in that
member's decision on a matter subject to hearing. The receipt of
information about a matter subject to hearing outside the evidence of record
shall not disqualify the member from participating in the decision on that
matter unless the member excuses himself or herself from participation in the
decision on the ground that he or she cannot restrict his or her decision on
the matter to the evidence of record.(B) Except as otherwise provided under
this chapter or by statute, no hearing examiner or member of the board shall
initiate or consider ex parte communications concerning a substantive matter
related to a pending hearing. Nothing contained herein, however, shall preclude
the hearing examiner from nonsubstantive ex parte communications on procedural
matters and matters affecting the efficient conduct of adjudicatory
hearings.(C) The hearing examiner and members of
the board shall disclose on the public record the source of any ex parte or
attempted ex parte communications pertaining to a substantive issue. If the
recipient of the ex parte communication determines that he or she can no longer
render an impartial decision, the recipient shall recuse himself or herself
from further participation in consideration of the matter.(D) If requested by any party, the
recipient of the ex parte communication shall file with the board an affidavit
setting forth the substance of the ex parte communication. The affidavit shall
be sealed, held as proffered material and maintained with the hearing
record.Last updated April 12, 2021 at 8:42 AM
Mar 20, 2009
Appealed
Franklin County
Franklin County, OH
Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2018 Sep 11 3:22 PM-18CV007652 0E317 - W2 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO Sarah Chorful, Administrator of the Estate of Juliana Addy, Plaintiff vs. Case No. Marie N. DiLauro, M.D., et al., …
DANE. it SORRIGAN 2I2HAR 15 PM 3:37 IN THELGOUFiT OFICOMMON PLEAS ISUMTICOUNFYEQHIO AMY R. WEIDMAN, M.D. } CASE NO. CV-2011-12-6918 ) Plaintiff ) JUDGE JUDY HUNTER ) vs. ) ) NHV PHYSICIANS PROFESSIONAL ) DEFENDANTS’ MEMORANDUM OPPOSING CORPORATION, et al. ) PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS ) AND COMPEL ARBITRATION Defendants. ) ) ) I. Introduction and Factual Background Plaintiff's counsel argues that Defendants “ambushed” Dr. Weidman, “provided her with misleading statements,” and ‘f…
Dec 09, 2011
NAILAH K. BYRD CUYAHOGA COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 Court of Common Pleas New Case Electronically Filed: COMPLAINT August 24,2023 12:22 …
Cuyahoga County, OH
Aug 24, 2023
BRIAN MOONEY
NAILAH K. BYRD CUYAHOGA COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 Court of Common Pleas REQUEST FOR SERVICE June 28,2023 12:18 …
Apr 21, 2023
INACTIVE
NAILAH K. BYRD CUYAHOGA COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 Court of Common Pleas REQUEST FOR SERVICE May 25,2023 10:53 …
Apr 21, 2023
INACTIVE
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.