Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
(A) Individuals conducting hearings or inquiries other than fact-finding or conciliation hearings shall have the authority to take the following actions:
(1) To administer oaths and affirmations;
(2) To receive relevant evidence and exclude irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence;
(3) To question witnesses;
(4) To cause depositions to be taken and to regulate the scope and course of discovery;
(5) To regulate the time, place, and course of the hearing or inquiry;
(6) To dispose of procedural requests or other similar matters;
(7) To hold conferences with the parties at any time for the settlement, simplification, or adjustment of the issues;
(8) To subpoena witnesses and the production of books, papers, documents, or other evidence;
(9) To exclude any person for improper conduct; and
(10) To take any other action necessary and authorized under Chapter 4117. of the Revised Code or Chapters 4117-1 to 4117-25 of the Administrative Code.
(B) No party may take an interlocutory appeal from any ruling issued by an administrative law judge or a board agent or designee under this rule or any oral ruling issued by an administrative law judge or a board agent or designee during a public hearing, prehearing conference, or inquiry unless the appeal presents a new or novel question of interpretation, law, or policy, or is taken from a ruling that represents a departure from past precedent or board practice, and an immediate determination by the board is needed to prevent the likelihood of undue prejudice or expense to one or more of the parties, should the board ultimately reverse the ruling in question.
(C) For fact-finding and conciliation hearings, paragraph (H) of rule 4117-9-05 and paragraph (F) of rule 4117-9-06 of the Administrative Code apply.
Feb 20, 2008
Closed
Montgomery County
Montgomery County, OH
INJUNCTION
Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2019 Aug 30 10:21 AM-19CV006170 OE822 - J6é IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 284, Relator, CASE NO. 19CV006170 V. JUDGE KIM J. BROWN …
Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2019 Oct 03 8:01 AM-19CV006170 OE867 - E72 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO State ex rel. TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 284, CASE NO. 19CV006170 Relator, …
CV-2014-03-1615 ANSW 04/28/2014 14:38:11 PM DAVIS, JANE M. Page 1 of 5 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO JOHN GLADMAN : : CASE NO. CV-2014-03-1615 …
Mar 28, 2014
Summit County, OH
Apr 28, 2014
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL
COPY IN THE COURT OF COMMMOWREEAS“OF-SUSMMIT COUNTY, OHIO 2006 SEP -8 PH 3:59 Ohio Civil Service Employees Association, SUMMIT COUNTY Local 11, AFSCME, AFL-CIO CLERK OF COURTS 390 Worthington Road, Suite A : Case No. CV-2006-07-4690 Westerville, Ohio 43082 : 05-ULP-02-0089 Appellant, Honorable Burnham Unruh, Judge vs. State Employment Relations Board 65 East State Street, 12" Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215-4213 Appellee. : JUDGMENT ENTRY The matters at issue between the parties hereto h…
Jul 28, 2006
Summit County, OH
Sep 08, 2006
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL
BRENDA BURNHAM-UNRUH
Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2018 Feb 15 12:28 PM-18CV000463 0E018 - R73 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO STATE EX REL. FRED ESPOSITO, CASE NO. 18CV-01-463 Relator, JUDGE GUY L. REECE II VS. OHIO STATE EMPLOYMENT and W. CRAIG ZIMPHER, CHAIR State Employment Relations Board, ) ) ) ) ) RELATIONS BOARD ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Respondent. ANSWER OF RESPONDENT STATE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD The Respondent, State Employment Relations Board (“SERB”)…
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.