Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 3901-8-01 | Coordination of benefits.

                                                

(A) Purpose

The purpose of this rule is to:

(1) Permit plans to
include a coordination of benefits "(COB)" provision;

(2) Provide the authority
for the orderly transfer of information needed to pay claims
promptly;

(3) Eliminate duplication
of benefits by permitting a plan to reduce benefits paid when, pursuant to this
rule, it is not required to pay its benefits first;

(4) Reduce claim payment
delays; and

(5) Further define the
"COB" statute.

(B) Authority

This rule is promulgated pursuant to section
3901.041 of the Revised Code, providing that the superintendent of insurance
shall adopt, amend and rescind rules and make adjudications necessary to
discharge his duties and exercise his powers under Title 39 of the Revised
Code; and section 3902.14 of the Revised Code, providing that the
superintendent may adopt rules to carry out the purposes of sections 3902.11 to
3902.14 of the Revised Code.

(C) Definitions

As used in this rule:

(1)

(a) "Allowable expense" means, except as set forth
below or otherwise defined by statute, any health care expense, including
coinsurance or co-payments and without reduction for any applicable deductible,
that is covered in full or in part by any of the plans covering the
person.

(b) If a plan is advised by the covered person that all plans
covering the person are high-deductible health plans and the person intends to
contribute to a health savings account established in accordance with Section
223 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the primary high-deductible health
plan's deductible is not an allowable expense, except for any health care
expense incurred that may not be subject to the deductible as described in
Section 223(c)(2)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

(c) An expense or a portion of an expense that is not covered by
any of the plans is not an allowable expense.

(d) Any expense that a provider by law or in accordance with a
contractual agreement is prohibited from charging a covered person is not an
allowable expense.

(e) The definition of "allowable expense" may exclude
certain types of coverage or benefits such as dental care, vision care,
prescription drug or hearing aids. A plan that limits the application of
"COB" to certain coverages or benefits may limit the definition of
allowable expenses in its contract to expenses that are similar to the expenses
that it provides. When "COB" is restricted to specific coverages or
benefits in a contract, the definition of allowable expense shall include
similar expenses to which "COB" applies.

(f) When a plan provides benefits in the form of services, the
reasonable cash value of each service will be considered an allowable expense
and a benefit paid.

(g) The amount of the reduction may be excluded from allowable
expense when a covered person's benefits are reduced under a primary
plan:

(i) Because the covered
person does not comply with the plan provisions concerning second surgical
opinions or precertification of admissions for services; or

(ii) Because the covered
person has a lower benefit because the covered person did not use a preferred
provider.

(2) "Birthday"
means the month and day in a calendar year and does not include the year in
which an individual is born.

(3) "Claim"
means a request that plan benefits be provided or paid. This term includes a
request for:

(a) Services, including supplies;

(b) Payment for all or a portion of expenses
incurred;

(c) A combination of paragraphs (C)(3)(a) and (C)(3)(b) of this
rule; or

(d) Indemnification.

(4) "Closed panel
plan" means a plan that provides health benefits to covered persons
primarily in the form of services through a panel of providers that have
contracted with or are employed by the plan, and that excludes benefits for
services provided by other providers, except in cases of emergency or referral
by a panel member.

(5) "Consolidated
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985" or "COBRA" means
coverage provided under a right of continuation pursuant to federal
law.

(6) "Coordination of
benefits" or "COB" means a procedure establishing the order in
which plans shall pay their claims, and permitting secondary plans to reduce
their benefits so that the combined benefits of all plans do not exceed total
allowable expenses.

(7) "Custodial
parent" means:

(a) The parent awarded custody of a child by a court decree;
or

(b) In the absence of a court decree, the parent with whom the
child resides more than one half of the calendar year without regard to any
temporary visitation.

(8) "Group-type
contract" means a contract not available to the general public which is
obtained and maintained only because of membership in, or in connection with, a
particular organization or group, including blanket coverage. This term shall
not include an individually underwritten and issued, guaranteed renewable
policy even if purchased through payroll deduction at a premium savings to the
insured since the insured would have a right to maintain or renew the policy
independently of continued employment with the employer.

(9) "High-deductible
health plan" has the meaning given the term under Section 223 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended by the Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003.

(10) "Hospital
indemnity benefits" means benefits which are not related to actual
expenses incurred. The term does not include reimbursement-type benefits even
if they are designed or administered to give the insured the right to elect
indemnity-type benefits at the time of claim.

(11)

(a) "Plan" means a form of coverage with which
coordination is allowed. Separate parts of a plan for members of a group that
are provided through alternative contracts that are intended to be part of a
coordinated package of benefits are considered one plan and there is no
"COB" among the separate parts of the plan.

(b) The definition of plan in a contract shall state the types of
coverage which will be considered in applying the "COB" provision of
that contract. Whether the contract uses the term "plan" or some
other term such as "program", the contractual definition may be no
broader than the definition of "plan" in paragraph (C)(11) of this
rule.

(c) Plan includes:

(i) Group and non-group
insurance and subscriber contracts;

(ii) An uninsured
arrangement of group or group-type coverage;

(iii) Group or group-type
and non-group coverage through a health insuring corporation, closed panel plan
or other prepayment, group practice or individual practice plan;

(iv) Group-type
contracts;

(v) The medical care
components of long term care contracts, such as skilled nursing
care;

(vi) Medical benefits
coverage under automobile "no fault" and traditional
"fault" type contract; and

(vii) Medicare or other
governmental benefits, as permitted by law, except as provided in paragraph
(C)(11)(d)(vii) of this rule. That part of the definition of plan may be
limited to the hospital, medical, and surgical benefits of the governmental
program.

(d) The term "plan" shall not include:

(i) Hospital indemnity
benefits or other fixed indemnity coverage;

(ii) Accident only
coverage or specified accident coverage;

(iii) A supplemental
sickness and accident policy excluded from coordination of benefits pursuant to
sections 3923.37 and/or 1751.56 of the Revised Code;

(iv) School accident-type
coverage;

(v) Benefits provided in
long term care insurance policies for non-medical services, for example,
personal care, adult day care, homemaker services, assistance with activities
of daily living, respite care and custodial care or for contracts that pay a
fixed daily benefit without regard to expenses incurred or the receipt of
services;

(vi) Medicare supplement
policies; or

(vii) A state plan under
medicaid, or other governmental plan when, by law, its benefits are in excess
of those of any private insurance plan or other non-governmental
plan.

(12) "Primary
plan" means a plan whose benefits for a person's health care coverage
shall be determined without taking the existence of any other plan into
consideration. A plan is a primary plan if either of the following conditions
is true:

(a) A plan either does not contain order of benefit rules, or it
has rules which differ from those permitted by this rule; or

(b) All plans which cover the person use the order of benefits
determination required by this rule, and under this rule that plan determines
its benefits first.

(13) "School
accident-type coverage" means a contract covering elementary, junior high,
high school and or college students for accidents only, including athletic
injuries, on a twenty-four hour basis or on a "to and from school"
basis.

(14) "Secondary
plan" means any plan which is not a primary plan. If a person is covered
by more than one secondary plan, the order of benefit determination rules of
this rule shall determine the order in which their benefits are determined in
relationship to each other.

(15) "This
plan" means, in a "COB" provision, the part of a contract
providing health care benefits to which the "COB" provision applies
and which may be reduced because of the benefits of other plans.

(D) Solicitation, certificate and
contract provisions

(1) The following
language shall be included as a separate and distinct paragraph on the first
page in at least one solicitation, marketing, advertising or enrollment
document which shall be provided to potential subscribers of a plan subject to
this rule and shall be printed in twelve point type:

"WARNING: IF YOU OR YOUR FAMILY MEMBERS
ARE COVERED BY MORE THAN ONE HEALTH CARE PLAN, YOU MAY NOT BE ABLE TO COLLECT
BENEFITS FROM BOTH PLANS. EACH PLAN MAY REQUIRE YOU TO FOLLOW ITS RULES OR USE
SPECIFIC DOCTORS AND HOSPITALS, AND IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH BOTH
PLANS AT THE SAME TIME. BEFORE YOU ENROLL IN THIS PLAN, READ ALL OF THE RULES
VERY CAREFULLY AND COMPARE THEM WITH THE RULES OF ANY OTHER PLAN THAT COVERS
YOU OR YOUR FAMILY."

(2) The following
language shall be included as a separate and distinct paragraph on the first
page in every contract, policy, certificate/evidence of coverage and summary
plan description issued to a beneficiary under a plan subject to this rule, and
shall be printed in twelve-point type:

"NOTICE: IF YOU OR YOUR FAMILY MEMBERS ARE
COVERED BY MORE THAN ONE HEALTH CARE PLAN, YOU MAY NOT BE ABLE TO COLLECT
BENEFITS FROM BOTH PLANS. EACH PLAN MAY REQUIRE YOU TO FOLLOW ITS RULES OR USE
SPECIFIC DOCTORS AND HOSPITALS, AND IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH BOTH
PLANS AT THE SAME TIME. READ ALL OF THE RULES VERY CAREFULLY, INCLUDING THE
COORDINATION OF BENEFITS SECTION, AND COMPARE THEM WITH THE RULES OF ANY OTHER
PLAN THAT COVERS YOU OR YOUR FAMILY."

(3) A contract which
utilizes "COB" shall contain the "COB" provisions set forth
in appendix A to this rule. Changes in words and format may be made to fit the
language and style of the rest of the contract or to reflect the difference
among plans which provide services, which pay benefits for expenses incurred,
and which indemnify. No substantive changes are permitted.

(4) Each certificate
issued under a group contract which utilizes "COB" shall contain the
"COB" provisions set forth in appendix A to this rule. Changes in
words and format may be made to fit the language and style of the rest of the
group certificate or to reflect the difference among plans which provide
services, which pay benefits for expenses incurred and which indemnify. No
substantive changes are permitted.

If a group policyholder or contractholder
distributes its own solicitation, marketing, advertising or enrollment
documents to its members who are potential subscribers of a plan subject to
these rules, then the plan shall make the foregoing language available for use
by the group.

(E) Prohibited coordination and benefit
design

(1) A contract shall not
reduce benefits on the basis that:

(a) Another plan exists and the covered person did not enroll in
that plan;

(b) A person is or could have been covered under another plan,
except with respect to part B of medicare; or

(c) A person has elected an option under another plan providing a
lower level of benefits than another option which could have been
elected.

(2) No contract,
certificate or policy shall contain a provision that its benefits are
"always excess" or "always secondary" to any other plan,
except as otherwise provided in this rule.

(3) Under the terms of a
closed panel plan, benefits are not payable if the covered person does not use
the services of a closed panel plan provider. In most instances,
"COB" does not occur if a covered person is enrolled in two or more
closed panel plans and obtains services from a provider in one of the closed
panel plans because the other closed panel plan (the one whose providers were
not used) has no liability. However, "COB" may occur during the plan
year when the covered person receives emergency services that would have been
covered by both plans. Then the secondary plan shall use the provisions of
paragraph (H) of this rule to determine the amount it should pay for the
benefit.

(4) No plan may use a
"COB" provision, or any other provision that allows it to reduce its
benefits with respect to any other coverage its insured may have that does not
meet the definition of plan under paragraph (C)(11) of this rule.

(F) Requirements

(1) Allowable
expense

(a) When plans have differing allowable expenses, the larger
allowable expense shall be used for the purpose of division (C) of section
3902.13 of the Revised Code. When benefits paid by a primary plan are less than
the allowable expenses, the secondary plan shall pay or provide its benefits
toward any remaining balance otherwise payable by the insured or the
certificate holder. A secondary plan shall not be required to make a payment of
an amount which exceeds the amount it would have paid if it were the primary
plan, but in no event, when combined with the amount paid by the primary plan,
shall payments by the secondary plan exceed one hundred per cent of the larger
of the expenses allowable under the provisions of the applicable policies and
contracts.

(b) When a plan provides benefits in the form of services, the
reasonable cash value of each service shall be both an allowable expense and a
benefit paid.

(c) When a contract restricts "COB" to specific
coverage, allowable expense shall include the expenses or services to which
"COB" applies under the contract.

(2) A secondary plan
shall not be required to pay for services unless such services are received in
accordance with the rules and provisions outlined in its policy, contract or
certificate.

(3) A primary plan shall
pay or provide its benefits as if the secondary plan does not exist. A plan
that does not contain a coordination of benefits provision shall not take into
account benefits of other plans. However, a contract holder's coverage
which is designed to supplement a part of a basic package of benefits may
provide that the supplementary coverage shall be excess to any other parts of
the plan provided by that contract holder. Examples of these types of
situations are major medical coverages that are superimposed over base plan
hospital and surgical benefits, and insurance type coverages that are written
in connection with a closed panel plan to provide out-of-network benefits. A
plan that does not contain order of benefit determination provisions that are
consistent with this rule is always the primary plan unless the provisions of
both plans, regardless of the provisions of paragraph (F)(3) of this rule,
state that the complying plan is primary.

(4) If the primary plan
is a closed panel plan and the secondary plan is not a closed panel plan, the
secondary plan shall pay or provide benefits as if it were the primary plan
when a covered person uses a non-panel provider, except for emergency services
or authorized referrals that are paid or provided by the primary
plan.

(5) When multiple
contracts providing coordinated coverage are treated as a single plan under
this rule, this paragraph applies only to the plan as a whole, and coordination
among the component contracts is governed by the terms of the contracts. If
more than one carrier pays or provides benefits under the plan, the carrier
designated as primary within the plan shall be responsible for the plan's
compliance with this rule.

(6) A secondary plan may
take the benefits of another plan into account when, under this rule, it is
secondary to the other plan.

(7) Nothing in these
rules shall be construed to prevent a third party payer and a provider from
entering into an agreement under which the provider agrees to accept, as
payment in full from any or all plans providing benefits to a beneficiary, an
amount which is less than the provider's regular charges.

(G) Order of benefit
determination

Order of benefits shall be determined by the
first applicable provision set forth in this paragraph:

(1) Non-dependent or
dependent. The benefits of a plan covering the person as an employee, member,
insured, subscriber or retiree, other than as a dependent, shall be determined
before those of a plan which covers the person as a dependent. However, the
benefits of a plan covering the person as a dependent shall be determined
before the benefits of a plan covering the person as other than a dependent if
the person is a medicare beneficiary, and as a result of Title XVIII of the
Social Security Act and its implementing regulations:

(a) Medicare is secondary to the plan covering the person as a
dependent; and

(b) Medicare is primary to the plan covering the person as other
than a dependent (e.g. a retired employee).

(2) Dependent child
covered under more than one plan. Unless there is a court decree stating
otherwise, plans covering a dependent child shall determine the order of
benefits as follows:

(a) For a dependent child whose parents are married (not
separated or divorced) or are living together, whether or not they have ever
been married:

(i) The plan of the
parent whose birthday falls earlier in the calendar year is the primary
plan;

(ii) If both parents have
the same birthday, the plan which has covered the parent for a longer period of
time is the primary plan;

(iii) If one plan does
not have the rule described in paragraphs (G)(2)(a)(i) and (G)(2)(a)(ii) of
this rule because that plan is not subject to the "COB" statutes, but
instead has a rule based upon the gender of the parent; and if, as a result,
the plans do not agree on the order of benefits, the plan containing the rule
based upon the gender of the parent shall determine the order of
benefits.

(b) For a dependent child whose parents are divorced or separated
or are not living together, whether or not they have ever been
married:

(i) If the specific terms
of the court decree state that one of the parents is responsible for the health
care expenses or health care coverage of the child, and the plan of that parent
has actual knowledge of those terms, that plan is primary. If the parent with
responsibility has no health care coverage for the dependent child's
health care expenses, but that parent's spouse does, that parent's
spouse's plan is the primary plan. This item shall not apply with respect
to any plan year during which benefits are paid or provided before the entity
has actual knowledge of the court decree provision.

(ii) If a court decree
states that both parents are responsible for the dependent child's health
care expenses or health care coverage, the provisions of paragraph (G)(2)(a) of
this rule shall determine the order of benefits.

(iii) If the specific
terms of the court decree state that the parents shall share joint custody,
without stating that one of the parents is responsible for the health care
expenses or health care coverage of the child, the plans covering the child
shall be subject to the order of benefit determination contained in paragraph
(G)(2)(a) of this rule.

(iv) If there is no court
decree allocating responsibility for the child's health care expenses or
health care coverage, the order of benefits for the child are as
follows:

(a) The plan covering the
custodial parent;

(b) The plan covering the
custodial parent's spouse;

(c) The plan covering the
non-custodial parent; and then

(d) The plan covering the
non-custodial parent's spouse.

(c) For a dependent child covered under more than one plan of
individuals who are not the parents of the child, the order of benefits shall
be determined, as applicable, under paragraph (G)(2)(a) or (G)(2)(b) of this
rule as if those individuals were the parents of the child.

(3) Active employee or
retired or laid-off employee. The benefits of a plan which covers a person as
an active employee who is neither laid off nor retired, or as that active
employee's dependent, is the primary plan. If the other plan does not have
this provision, and if, as a result, the plans do not agree on the order of
benefits, this provision shall be ignored.

This paragraph does not supersede paragraph
(G)(1) of this rule. Coverage provided an individual as a retired worker and as
a dependent of that individual's spouse as an active worker will be
determined under paragraph (G)(1) of this rule. Paragraph (G)(3) of this rule
covers the situation where one individual is covered under one policy as an
active worker and under another policy as a retired worker. It would also apply
to an individual covered as a dependent under both of those policies.

(4) "COBRA" or
state continuation coverage. If a person whose coverage is provided under a
right of continuation pursuant to federal or state law also is covered under
another plan, the following shall be the order of benefit
determination:

(a) The plan covering the person as an employee, member,
subscriber or retiree (or as that person's dependent) is the primary
plan;

(b) The continuation coverage provided pursuant to federal or
state law is the secondary plan.

If the other plan does not have the rule
described above, and if, as a result, the plans do not agree on the order of
benefits, this rule is ignored. This provision does not apply if the order of
benefits can be determined under paragraph (G)(1) of this rule.

(5) Longer or shorter
length of coverage. If none of the preceding provisions determines the order of
benefits, the plan which has covered the person for the longer period of time
is the primary plan and the plan which covered that person for the shorter
period of time is the secondary plan. For the purposes of this
provision:

(a) The time covered under a plan is measured from the
claimant's first date of coverage under that plan, or, if that date is not
readily available for a group plan, the date the claimant first became a member
of the group covered by that plan shall be used as the date from which to
determine the length of time the person's coverage under the present plan
has been in force;

(b) Two successive plans shall be treated as one if the covered
person was eligible under the second plan within twenty-four hours after
coverage under the first plan ended;

(c) The start of a new plan does not include:

(i) A change in the
amount or scope of a plan's benefits;

(ii) A change in the
entity that pays, provides or administers the plan's benefits;
or

(iii) A change from one
type of plan to another, such as, from a single plan to a multiple employer
plan.

(6) If none of the
preceding rules determines the order of benefits, the allowable expenses shall
be shared equally between the plans.

(H) Procedure to be followed by secondary
plan to calculate benefits and pay a claim.

In determining the amount to be paid by the
secondary plan on a claim, should the plan wish to coordinate benefits, the
secondary plan shall calculate the benefits it would have paid on the claim in
the absence of other health care coverage and apply that calculated amount to
any allowable expense under its plan that is unpaid by the primary plan. The
secondary plan may reduce its payment by the amount so that, when combined with
the amount paid by the primary plan, the total benefits paid or provided by all
plans for the claim do not exceed one hundred per cent of the total allowable
expense for that claim. In addition, the secondary plan shall credit to its
plan deductible any amounts it would have credited to its deductible in the
absence of other health care coverage.

(I) Miscellaneous provisions

(1) A secondary plan
which provides benefits in the form of services may recover the reasonable cash
value of the services from a primary plan, to the extent that benefits for the
services are covered by, and have not already been paid or provided by the
primary plan. Nothing in this paragraph shall be interpreted to require a plan
to reimburse a covered person in cash for value of services provided by a plan
that provides benefits in the form of services.

(2) A plan with order of
benefit determination rules which comply with this rule (complying plan) may
coordinate its benefits with a plan which is "excess" or "always
secondary" or which uses order of benefit determination rules which are
inconsistent with this rule (non-complying plan) as follows:

(a) If the complying plan is the primary plan, it shall pay or
provide its benefits first;

(b) If the complying plan is the secondary plan, it shall pay or
provide its benefits first, but the amount of the benefits payable shall be
determined as if the complying plan were the secondary plan. Such payment shall
be the limit of the complying plan's liability;

(c) If a non-complying plan does not provide the information
needed by a complying plan to determine its benefits within a reasonable time
after it is requested to do so, the complying plan shall assume that the
benefits of the non-complying plan are identical to its own, and shall pay its
benefits accordingly. However, if the complying plan receives information
within two years of payment as to the actual benefits of the non-complying
plan, it shall adjust payments accordingly.

(d) If a non-complying plan which paid or provided benefits as a
primary plan reduces its benefits so that a claimant receives less in benefits
than he would have received had the complying plan paid or provided its
benefits as the secondary plan, the complying plan shall advance to, or on
behalf of, the claimant an amount equal to such difference. The amount
advanced, combined with other amounts previously paid by the complying plan,
shall not exceed the liability of the complying plan as calculated as if the
complying plan were the primary plan.

In consideration of the advance, the
complying plan shall be subrogated to all rights of the claimant against the
non-complying plan. The advance by the complying plan shall be without
prejudice to any claim it may have against the non-complying plan in the
absence of subrogation.

(3) A term such as
"medical care" or "dental care" may be substituted for the
term "health care" in describing the coverages to which the
"COB" provisions of a contract apply.

(4) Provisions regarding
either "COB" or subrogation may be included in a health care benefits
contract without compelling the inclusion or exclusion of the other in that
contract.

(5) If the plans cannot
agree on the order of benefits within thirty calendar days after the plans have
received all of the information needed to pay the claim, the plans shall
immediately pay the claim in equal shares and determine their relative
liabilities following payment, except that no plan shall be required to pay
more than it would have paid had it been the primary plan.

(J) This rule is applicable to every
contract which provides health care benefits and which was issued on or after
the effective date of this rule.

(K) Penalties

Whoever violates this rule or any paragraph
thereof shall be deemed to have engaged in an unfair and deceptive insurance
act or practice under sections 3901.19 to 3901.26 of the Revised Code, and is
subject to proceedings pursuant to those sections.

(L) Severability

If any paragraph, term or provision of this rule
is adjudged invalid for any reason, the judgment shall not affect, impair or
invalidate any other paragraph, term or provision of this rule, but the
remaining paragraphs, terms and provisions shall be and continue in full force
and effect.


View Appendix

View Latest Dockets

4 Files
Filed

May 02, 2024

Status

Active

Court

Montgomery County

County

Montgomery County, OH

View More Dockets

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 4 pages

SANIEL M. HORRIGAN TON AUG 15 PH 1:54 SUMMIT COUNTY GLERK OF COURTS x THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO JESSICA M. THOMAS CASE NO. 2011 01 0217 Plaintiff JUDGE COSGROVE = VS - DAVID R. DUNCAN, et al. Defendants ) ) ) ) ) DEFENDANT RANDY CUMMINGS ) ) ) ) LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Pursuant to Ohio Civ. R. 36, Defendant Randy Cummings submits the following requests for admission to Co-Defendants, David R. Duncan and Green Local School District, which are to be answered in writing w…

Case Filed

Jan 12, 2011

County

Summit County, OH

Filed Date

Aug 15, 2011

Category

OTHER CIVIL

preview-icon 3 pages

Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2019 Jan 25 4:10 PM-19CV000754 OE502 - E44 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION DAVID GARRETT 3577 Sutterton Lane Westerville, OH 43081 Plaintiff, vs. SALLAN ALE MOHAMED 5705 Freeport Court Case Now: Westerville, OH 43081 and Judge: GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY One Geico Center Macon, GA 31296 Defendant. COMPLAINT (Jury Demand Endorsed Hercon) COUNT I 1, On or about February 28, 2017, Plaintif…

Case Name 19 CV 000754
Case Filed

Jan 25, 2019

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

Jan 25, 2019

Judge Hon. David C. Young Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for David C. Young
preview-icon 5 pages

Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2023 Feb 06 3:45 PM-23CV000637 0G254 - Y5 IN THE FRANLIN COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO Heart of Gold Title, LLC, Plaintiff, Case No. 23 CV 637 vs. Judge Andria Nobl…

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

Feb 06, 2023

Judge

ANDRIA C NOBLE

preview-icon 2 pages

. | IN THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT OF COMI i (eum ) -<-FILSFATE OF OHIO °F COMMON Peas State Auto Insurance dll] Aus ~6 PH Is 3k Case No. 518 E. Broad St. GREG, Jer os g Columbus, OH 43215 4, CLERK RUSH ul = ow J 1 ONTCOHERY ConhS, iP Plaintiff “5 : oa Vv. Kevin Alexander 3 1636 Mars Hill #F West Carrollton, OH 45449 : Defendant COMPLAINT Count 1. On or about August 19, 2005, Plaintiff State Auto Ins. Co. (“State Auto”) had an automobile policy of insurance in force on its insured, Mich…

Case Filed

Aug 06, 2007

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Aug 06, 2007

Category

OTHER TORT

preview-icon 2 pages

PRU \ 781167 INTHE DELAWARE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS , DELAWARE, OHIO NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA P.O. BOX 8379 CANTON, OH 44711 Plaintiff, i CW () U 8) i vs. Case No. ( Judge Everett H. Krueger ANTHONY TOMAK . 743 FERN DR nO DELAWARE OH 43015 Boe ovr = Defendant. rae a COMPLAINT BE xs oO x= 1 Plaintiff says that on May 9, 2008, ANGELA PAUL was the owner ofa mig velffle, o which vehicle was on said date insured by a contract of insurance with NATION WIDE INSURANCE COMPANY OF A…

County

Delaware County, OH

Filed Date

Jun 17, 2009

Category

(CV) CIVIL COMMON PLEAS

Judge Hon. KRUEGER, EVERETT H. Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for KRUEGER, EVERETT H.
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope