Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 3770:2-3-06 | Video lottery licenses; fines.

                                                

(A) As determined by the director, monetary fines may be imposed upon a video lottery sales agent who does not comply with the Lottery Act, all rules, regulations, terms and conditions, policies, orders and directives adopted, promulgated or issued by the commission or the director which may include but may not be limited to a determination that a video lottery sales agent has failed to comply with or violated any provisions set forth in paragraphs (A)(1) to (A)(3) of rule 3770:2-3-05 of the Administrative Code.

(B) Any fines under this section may be in addition to or in lieu of a suspension or revocation under rule 3770:2-3-05 of the Administrative Code.

(C) The director may establish a schedule of fines that may be imposed pursuant to the authority set forth herein. Said schedule, and any amendments or revisions thereto, shall be approved by the director and made available to video lottery sales agents prior to imposition of monetary fines thereunder. Nothing contained on a fine schedule established by the director for video lottery sales agents shall mandate imposition of a fine, but in the event that fines are imposed, the video lottery sales agent fine schedule in effect at the time of the event leading to a determination that a fine shall be imposed, shall be applicable.

(D) When required to do so by the Administrative Procedure Act, the director shall afford a hearing to a video lottery sales agent affected by an order imposing a fine. Such hearings shall be conducted by the director or a hearing examiner designated by the director and shall comply with requirements for adjudication hearings set out in the Administrative Procedure Act. The requirement of the Administrative Procedure Act that adjudication hearings be afforded prior to a final decision by the director to suspend or revoke a video lottery license may be waived under circumstances such as non-payment of funds owed by a video lottery sales agent, or for reasons related to the public safety, convenience or trust which require immediate action. Further, as necessary for reasons related to public safety, convenience or trust which require immediate action, the director may order the immediate and indefinite disabling of all or a portion of the video lottery operations and/or removal of video lottery equipment at a video lottery sales agent's video lottery facility. The director, however, must continue to comply with the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act in affording the video lottery sales agent a subsequent opportunity for an adjudication hearing.



Last updated April 14, 2021 at 3:48 PM


View Latest Documents

preview-icon 42 pages

COPY CERTIFICATION SANIEL M. HORRIGAN 2011 JUN 29 PH 3 GG SUMMIT COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS The State of Ohio ) ) SS County of Cuyahoga ) I, the undersigned Chief Legal Counsel for the Ohio Lottery Commission, hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and exact reproduction of the complete records of the administrative proceedings in the matter of Jong Sung Yun v. Ohio Lottery Commission, Summit County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2011-06-3092, on this 27 day of 2011. f Chief Legal Ohio …

County

Summit County, OH

Filed Date

Jun 28, 2011

Category

ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL

Judge

TAMMY O'BRIEN

preview-icon 19 pages

COPY DANIEL M. HOBRIGAN 26H SUN -8 PH 3:07 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAST EN Seis SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO JONG SUNG YUN : CASENO) 04 1 06 3092 President : North Main Mini Mart : JUDGE 703 North Main Street : Akron, Ohio 44310, : Judge Tammy O’Brien Appellant, : NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE v. : APPEAL OHIO LOTTERY COMMISSION 615 West Superior Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44113 : PRAECIPE FOR PREPARATION OF Appellee. : TRANSCRIPT I. NOTICE OF APPEAL Appellant, Jong Sung Yun, President, North Main…

County

Summit County, OH

Filed Date

Jun 08, 2011

Category

ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL

Judge

TAMMY O'BRIEN

preview-icon 66 pages

(A / " t e g - ey by yy / 9 Op Mery S & Chi fy bo 44, 0 1 OC: ie IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS « oy SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO As JENNIFER PERROT, et al., Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 2009-04-2564 Ws. JUDGE BURNAM UNRUH TODD BAUGHMAN, DEFENDANT’S REPLY BRIEF IN | SUPPORT OF MOTION Defendant. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Now comes Defendant, Todd Baughman, by and through counsel, and submits the following Reply Brief in support of his Motion for Summary Judgment. 1. Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 13 (Jennifer Perrot’s Affidavit)…

Case Filed

Apr 01, 2009

County

Summit County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 22, 2009

Category

OTHER TORT

Judge

BRENDA BURNHAM-UNRUH

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope