(A) In any proceeding before the commission, no employee or agent of the director who performs any investigative or prosecuting function in connection with the proceeding, no party in the proceeding, or agent, or counsel, or anyone acting on behalf of a party, and no other person who has appeared before the commission in such proceeding shall communicate ex parte, directly or indirectly, with the commission or any member thereof, or any employee involved in the decisional process in such proceeding.
(B) In any proceeding before the commission, neither the commission nor any other person involved in the decisional process of such proceeding, shall communicate ex parte, directly or indirectly, with any employee or agent of the director who performs any investigative or prosecuting function in connection with the proceeding, with any party in the proceeding, or agent, or counsel, or anyone acting on behalf of a party, or with any other person who has appeared before the commission in such proceeding.
Rule 3746-3-08 | Standards of conduct and suspension.
Rule 3746-3-10 | Participation by state employees.
28 pages
F-70881 RJC/cad « ' IN,THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS . ‘“MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. Plaintiff -vs- Kimberly Smith, aka Kimberly L. Smith, et al. Defendant -and- General Motors Acceptance Corp. 500 Enterprise Road Suite 150 Horsham, PA 19044 New Party Defendant. ee , CASE NO. 05-0611 JUDGE DAVID A. GOWDOWN SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT FOR FORECLOSURE AND Notice Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices ActFIRST COUNT 1. Plaintiff says that…
Montgomery County, OH
Mar 15, 2006
MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE
38 pages
D9374 - P48 3 2 . Ba BEFORE THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS . & g ze FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO o a oe nm 4 Ben . 2 . ore 22 AEP, OHIO, et al., : SB 23 © Case No. 09-CVH-09-14494 aA a BE Plaintiffs, : & S83 °24 and : < Judge Sheeran * BUCKEYE POWER CO., et al., Intervenor Plaintiffs, and ARCELORMITTAL CLEVELAND, INC., et al., : INTERVENOR PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF IN : SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT FOR Intervenor Plaintiffs, : DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTIVE v : RELIEF AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION OF : STATE OF OHIO…
66 pages
D9268 - R52 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OINO CARLOS SALMONS, ET AL., Plaintiffs, + Case No. 08 CVC 10 14939 Judge Bessey 2 PALLITHANAM LLC, ET AL., 2 m 3 a o ®@ 7 oO Defendants. 2 = - = i e 6 OZ DEFENDANTS WAL-MART STORES, INC, AND_ WAL-MART ST! EAST_LP.’S REPLY MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT S| AQ 1. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Plainuffs’ have failed to set forth any admissible evidence that Wal-Mart either created. had actual knowledge or constructive notice …
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
Your content views addon has successfully been added.
No Worries!
Adding your team is easy
in the "Manage Company Users" tab
