Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 3745-81-83 | Control of lead and copper; source water treatment requirements.

                                                

Public water systems shall complete the applicable source water at the entry point to the distribution system monitoring and treatment requirements (described in the referenced portions of paragraph (B) of this rule and in rules 3745-81-86 and 3745-81-88 of the Administrative Code) by the deadlines in paragraphs (A)(1) to (A)(6) of this rule.

(A) Deadlines for completing source water treatment steps.

(1) Step one: a system exceeding the lead or copper action level shall complete source water at the entry point to the distribution system monitoring for lead and copper (in accordance with paragraph (B) of rule 3745-81-88 of the Administrative Code), make a treatment recommendation, and submit approvable plans, if needed, to the director (in accordance with paragraph (B)(1) of this rule) no later than one hundred eighty days after the end of the monitoring period during which the lead or copper action level was exceeded.

If monitoring is required annually, triennially, or less frequently, the end of the monitoring period is September thirtieth of the calendar year in which the sampling occurs. If the director has established an alternate period, then the end of the monitoring period will be the last day of that period.

(2) Step two: the director shall complete the review and approval of plans regarding source water treatment (in accordance with paragraph (B)(2) of this rule) within six months after submission of monitoring results under step one.

(3) Step three: if the director requires installation of source water treatment, the system shall install the treatment (in accordance with paragraph (B)(3) of this rule) within twenty-four months after completion of step two.

(4) Step four: the system shall complete follow-up tap water monitoring (in accordance with paragraph (D)(2) of rule 3745-81-86 of the Administrative Code) and source water at the entry point to the distribution system monitoring (in accordance with paragraph (C) of rule 3745-81-88 of the Administrative Code) within thirty-six months after completion of step two.

(5) Step five: the director shall review the system's installation and operation of source water treatment and specify maximum permissible source water at the entry point to the distribution system levels (in accordance with paragraph (B)(4) of this rule) within six months after completion of step four.

(6) Step six: the system shall operate in compliance with the director-specified maximum permissible lead and copper source water at the entry point to the distribution system levels (in accordance with paragraph (B)(4) of this rule) and continue monitoring (in accordance with paragraph (D) of rule 3745-81-88 of the Administrative Code).

(B) Description of source water treatment requirements.

(1) System treatment recommendation. Any system which exceeds the lead or copper action level shall recommend in writing to the director the installation and operation of one of the source water treatments listed in paragraph (B)(2) of this rule. A system may recommend that no treatment be installed based upon a demonstration that source water treatment is not necessary to minimize lead and copper levels at user's taps.

(2) Director determination regarding source water treatment. The director shall complete an evaluation of the results of all source water at the entry point to the distribution system monitoring submitted by the water system to determine whether source water treatment is necessary to minimize lead or copper levels in water delivered to users' taps. If the director determines that treatment is needed, the system shall submit approvable plans for source water treatment selected from ion exchange, reverse osmosis, lime softening, or coagulation/filtration. If the director requests additional information to aid in the review, the water system shall provide the information by the date specified in the director's request. The director shall notify the system in writing of the determination and set forth the basis for the decision.

(3) Installation of source water treatment. Each system shall properly install and operate the source water treatment approved by the director under paragraph (B)(2) of this rule.

(4) Director's review of source water treatment and specification of maximum permissible levels of lead and copper at source water at the entry points to the distribution system. The director shall review the source water at the entry point to the distribution system monitoring completed by the water system both before and after the system installs source water treatment, and determine whether the system has properly installed and operated the source water treatment approved by the director. Based upon the review, the director shall specify the maximum permissible lead and copper concentrations for finished water entering the distribution system. Such levels shall reflect the contaminant removal capability of the treatment properly operated and maintained. The director shall notify the system in writing and explain the basis for the decision.

(5) Continued operation and maintenance. Each water system shall maintain lead and copper levels below the maximum permissible concentrations specified by the director at each sampling point monitored in accordance with rule 3745-81-88 of the Administrative Code. The system is out of compliance with this paragraph if the level of lead or copper at any sampling point is greater than the maximum permissible concentration specified by the director.

(6) Modification of director treatment decisions. Upon the director's initiative or in response to a request by a water system, the director may modify the approval of the source water treatment plans under paragraph (B)(2) of this rule, or maximum permissible lead and copper concentrations for finished water entering the distribution system under paragraph (B)(4) of this rule. A request for modification by a system shall be in writing, explain why the modification is appropriate, and provide supporting documentation. The director may modify the approval where the director concludes that such change is necessary to ensure that the system continues to minimize lead and copper concentrations in source water at the entry point to the distribution system. A revised approval shall be made in writing, set forth the new treatment requirements, explain the basis for the director's decision, and provide an implementation schedule for completing the treatment modifications.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 8 pages

e-filed on 12/09/2014 at 10:09 AM in Wayne County, Ohio IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS WAYNE COUNTY, OHIO The Board of Health of the Wayne County : Case No. 2014 CVC-H 00343 Combined General Health District : Plaintiff, : Judge: Mark K. Wiest v. : Philip R. Cehrs : MOTION FOR CONTEMPT Defendant. : Now comes Plaintiff, the Board of Health of the Wayne County Combined General Health District, by and through the undersigned Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and respectfully requests this Court for …

County

Wayne County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 09, 2014

Category

OTHER CIVIL

Judge Hon. WIEST, MARK K Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for WIEST, MARK K
preview-icon 6 pages

COPY. con ZALESN! COURT OF COMMON PLEAS . CIVIL DIVISION ous DEC“ PHI 32 SUMMIT COUNTY siat STATE OF OHIO MARY SLIWINSKL, et al No. 2006 02 0884 : JUDGE COSGROVE vs. PLAINTIFE’S SECOND AMENDED REPLY TO DEFENDANT MOTION TO CAPITAL PROPERTIES DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MANAGEMENT LTD., et al. AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs re-amend their Reply in a single aspect because of the recently discovered ruling of the Ohio EPA that Defendants are a Public Water System that must comply with the law and reg…

County

Summit County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 04, 2006

Category

BREACH OF AGREEMENT

Judge

PATRICIA A COSGROVE

preview-icon 8 pages

R. KYLE WITT FAIRFIELD COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 239 W. Main Street Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 (740) 652-7560 (614) 322-5265 F: (740) 653-4708 ORIGINAL Amy Brown-Thompson (0070511) Steven Darnell (0098940) Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys Fairfield Cotinty Prosecutor's Office 239 West Main Street, Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 Phone 740-652-7560 | Fax 740-653-4708 Amy.Brown-Thompson@fairfieldcountyohio.gov Attorney for the Fairfield County Board of Health IN COMPUTER 1023 HAR 3…

Case Filed

Mar 30, 2023

Case Status

Closed

County

Fairfield County, OH

Filed Date

Mar 30, 2023

Category

(CV) CIVIL

Judge Hon. BERENS, RICHARD E Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for BERENS, RICHARD E
preview-icon 3 pages

| (a ttinvnnenn FLED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 2006 NOY -B PH 2:50 BAR EDEEY CLERK GF COURTS - MONTGOMERY £0., OHIO poe IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO BLANE SCARBERRY, et al. : CASE NO. 05-8403 “ (Judge Mary Katherine Huffman) Plaintiffs vs. : DEFENDANT THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE, OHIO'S THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE,: DESIGNATION OF TRIAL OHIO MATERIALS Defendant Pursuant to Mont. Co. C.P.R. 2.01(V)(D)(2)(d) and this Court’s Order, Defendant The Village of Farmersville,…

Case Filed

Nov 02, 2005

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Nov 08, 2006

Category

OTHER TORT

preview-icon 3 pages

SED wwrne COURT OF COMMON PLEA: ay 25 PH I: 52 BUTLER COUNTY, OHIO 2006 M CITY OF HA HAMILTON, QHIO : Case No.: CV2006-02-0394 Sen Pla : Judge Pater GREGORY PARSLEY, ET AL Defendants (925 Greenwood Ave) Plaintiff now comes before the Court asking that they be permitted to enter on 925 Greenwood Ave, Hamilton, Butler County, Ohio, (legal description attached as Exhibit A) in order to obtain bids for demolition of the subject Property. Plaintiff was granted Default Judgment for this …

Case Filed

Feb 03, 2006

County

Butler County, OH

Filed Date

May 25, 2006

Judge

Pater, Honorable Charles L.

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope