Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 3745-81-73 | Filtration of water from surface water sources.

                                                

A public water system that uses a surface water
source, in whole or in part, shall provide treatment consisting of both
disinfection, as specified in paragraph (B) of rule 3745-81-72 of the
Administrative Code, and filtration treatment which complies with paragraph
(A), (B), or (C) of this rule. Distinction between surface water sources and
ground water sources is set forth in rule 3745-81-76 of the Administrative
Code. Filtration treatment shall consistently and reliably achieve at least
ninety-nine per cent (2 log) removal of Cryptosporidium. Failure to meet any
requirement of this rule shall be a treatment technique violation and shall
require public notification as set forth in rule 3745-81-32 of the
Administrative Code.

(A) Conventional filtration treatment.
All public water systems using conventional filtration treatment to treat
surface water shall meet the following:

(1) Turbidity levels of representative
samples of filtered water shall be less than or equal to 0.3 nephelometric
turbidity units (NTU) in at least ninety-five per cent of the samples analyzed
each month.

(2) The turbidity level of representative
samples of a public water system's filtered water shall not exceed one
NTU.

(B) Slow sand filtration. Filtration by a
public water system filtering surface water by slow sand filtration shall meet
the following:

(1) For a public water
system using slow sand filtration, the turbidity level of representative
samples of filtered water shall be less than or equal to one NTU in at least
ninety-five per cent of the samples each month.

(2) The turbidity level
of representative samples of a public water system's filtered water shall
not exceed five NTU.

(C) Alternative filtration technologies
and direct filtration treatment. If a public water system using a surface water
source, in whole or in part, can demonstrate to the director, using pilot plant
studies or other means, that a filtration technology not listed in paragraph
(A) or (B) of this rule, in combination with disinfection treatment that meets
the requirements of paragraph (B) of rule 3745-81-72 of the Administrative
Code, consistently and reliably achieves ninety-nine per cent (2 log) removal
of Cryptosporidium, 99.9 per cent (3 log) removal and/or inactivation of
Giardia lamblia cysts and 99.99 per cent (4 log) removal and/or inactivation of
viruses, the director may accept this alternative filtration technology for use
by the public water system. For a public water system that makes this
demonstration, the requirements of paragraph (A) of this rule apply. For a
public water system that makes this demonstration, the minimum log removal and
inactivation requirements for conventional filtration in table A of rule
3745-81-72 of the Administrative Code shall apply. Each membrane filter which
has been awarded credit for log removal as described in this paragraph shall
undergo direct integrity testing daily to verify the log removal the filter has
been credited to achieve. The direct integrity testing requirements in
paragraph (K)(3) of rule 3745-81-68 of the Administrative Code shall apply. In
addition, continuous filtrate turbidity monitoring shall be performed on each
membrane filter. If the turbidity of a membrane filter exceeds 0.15 NTU in two
consecutive readings taken fifteen minutes apart, the system shall conduct a
direct integrity test on the membrane filter. A membrane filter shall be
removed from service for repairs until the membrane filter can pass a direct
integrity test to verify the log removal it has been credited to achieve.
Systems shall submit a monthly report including daily direct integrity test
results, any turbidity monitoring results which trigger direct integrity
testing, and any corrective action taken.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 8 pages

e-filed on 12/09/2014 at 10:09 AM in Wayne County, Ohio IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS WAYNE COUNTY, OHIO The Board of Health of the Wayne County : Case No. 2014 CVC-H 00343 Combined General Health District : Plaintiff, : Judge: Mark K. Wiest v. : Philip R. Cehrs : MOTION FOR CONTEMPT Defendant. : Now comes Plaintiff, the Board of Health of the Wayne County Combined General Health District, by and through the undersigned Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and respectfully requests this Court for …

County

Wayne County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 09, 2014

Category

OTHER CIVIL

Judge Hon. WIEST, MARK K Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for WIEST, MARK K
preview-icon 6 pages

COPY. con ZALESN! COURT OF COMMON PLEAS . CIVIL DIVISION ous DEC“ PHI 32 SUMMIT COUNTY siat STATE OF OHIO MARY SLIWINSKL, et al No. 2006 02 0884 : JUDGE COSGROVE vs. PLAINTIFE’S SECOND AMENDED REPLY TO DEFENDANT MOTION TO CAPITAL PROPERTIES DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MANAGEMENT LTD., et al. AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs re-amend their Reply in a single aspect because of the recently discovered ruling of the Ohio EPA that Defendants are a Public Water System that must comply with the law and reg…

County

Summit County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 04, 2006

Category

BREACH OF AGREEMENT

Judge

PATRICIA A COSGROVE

preview-icon 8 pages

R. KYLE WITT FAIRFIELD COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 239 W. Main Street Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 (740) 652-7560 (614) 322-5265 F: (740) 653-4708 ORIGINAL Amy Brown-Thompson (0070511) Steven Darnell (0098940) Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys Fairfield Cotinty Prosecutor's Office 239 West Main Street, Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 Phone 740-652-7560 | Fax 740-653-4708 Amy.Brown-Thompson@fairfieldcountyohio.gov Attorney for the Fairfield County Board of Health IN COMPUTER 1023 HAR 3…

Case Filed

Mar 30, 2023

Case Status

Closed

County

Fairfield County, OH

Filed Date

Mar 30, 2023

Category

(CV) CIVIL

Judge Hon. BERENS, RICHARD E Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for BERENS, RICHARD E
preview-icon 3 pages

| (a ttinvnnenn FLED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 2006 NOY -B PH 2:50 BAR EDEEY CLERK GF COURTS - MONTGOMERY £0., OHIO poe IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO BLANE SCARBERRY, et al. : CASE NO. 05-8403 “ (Judge Mary Katherine Huffman) Plaintiffs vs. : DEFENDANT THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE, OHIO'S THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE,: DESIGNATION OF TRIAL OHIO MATERIALS Defendant Pursuant to Mont. Co. C.P.R. 2.01(V)(D)(2)(d) and this Court’s Order, Defendant The Village of Farmersville,…

Case Filed

Nov 02, 2005

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Nov 08, 2006

Category

OTHER TORT

preview-icon 3 pages

SED wwrne COURT OF COMMON PLEA: ay 25 PH I: 52 BUTLER COUNTY, OHIO 2006 M CITY OF HA HAMILTON, QHIO : Case No.: CV2006-02-0394 Sen Pla : Judge Pater GREGORY PARSLEY, ET AL Defendants (925 Greenwood Ave) Plaintiff now comes before the Court asking that they be permitted to enter on 925 Greenwood Ave, Hamilton, Butler County, Ohio, (legal description attached as Exhibit A) in order to obtain bids for demolition of the subject Property. Plaintiff was granted Default Judgment for this …

Case Filed

Feb 03, 2006

County

Butler County, OH

Filed Date

May 25, 2006

Judge

Pater, Honorable Charles L.

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope