Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 3745-560-05 | Composting - closure cost estimate.

                                                

(A) Closure cost estimate. The owner or operator of a class
I or class II composting facility shall determine the closure cost estimate as
follows:

(1) Class I composting facility. The
closure cost estimate shall be based on the closure costs at the point in the
operating life of the facility when the extent and manner of the operation
would make the closure the most expensive, and shall be based on a third party
conducting the closure activities. The closure cost estimate shall be
documented as an itemized written estimate, in current dollars, of the cost of
closure. Ohio EPA may require revisions to the closure cost estimate or to the
closure financial assurance instrument.

(2) Class II composting facility. The
closure cost estimate shall be calculated as follows:

(a) For facilities accepting solid wastes authorized in
accordance with paragraph (B) of rule 3745-560-210 of the Administrative Code,
two dollars and fifty cents per cubic yard, based on the operational capacity
of the materials placement area, excluding the storage capacity of compost
product, as specified in the authorizing document.

(b) For facilities accepting alternative materials, eight
dollars per cubic yard or the local disposal rate, whichever is higher, for the
maximum amount of alternative materials authorized pursuant to rule
3745-560-205 of the Administrative Code that will be managed based on the
operational capacity of the materials placement area, excluding the storage
capacity of compost product, as specified in the authorizing
document.

(c) Class II composting facilities may request approval
from the director of an alternative closure cost estimate that is lower than
the estimate calculated in accordance with paragraph (A)(2)(a) or (A)(2)(b) of
this rule by submitting an application that demonstrates one of the
following:

(i) For alternative
materials, that the cost of disposal is equivalent to the cost of disposal for
materials authorized in paragraph (B) of rule 3745-560-210 of the
Administrative Code, and that the closure cost estimate for the material can be
calculated at two dollars and fifty cents per cubic yard.

(ii) The owner or
operator has obtained authorization to land apply any material that is not a
compost product on property owned by the owner or operator in compliance with
Chapters 3734. and 6111. of the Revised Code.

(B) Annual review of closure cost estimate. The owner or
operator of a class I or class II composting facility shall annually review and
make appropriate revisions to the closure cost estimate in accordance with
paragraph (A) of this rule, and as follows:

(1) For class I
composting facilities, an adjustment for inflation shall be made. The
adjustment shall be made as specified in this paragraph, using the preceding
February inflation factor derived from the annual implicit price deflator for
gross domestic product as published by the U.S. department of commerce. The
inflation factor is the result of dividing the latest published annual deflator
by the annual deflator for the previous year.

(a) The first adjustment is made by multiplying the closure
cost estimate by the inflation factor. The result is the adjusted closure cost
estimate.

(b) Subsequent adjustments are made by multiplying the most
recently adjusted closure cost estimate by the most recent inflation
factor.

(2) For class II
composting facilities, annually review and make appropriate revisions to the
closure cost estimate to determine if the estimate accurately represents the
cost to close the facility. The review shall take into consideration changes to
the operational capacity, facility design and operations, changes to the
materials placement area, changes to the amount of feedstocks, bulking agents,
additives, and compost mixtures on site, and any other changes that would
increase the cost of closure.

(C) Review of closure cost estimates associated with
modifications or amendments to registrations.

(1) Upon issuance of a permit to install
for a modification of an existing class I composting facility, the owner or
operator shall review and make appropriate revisions to the closure cost
estimate in accordance with paragraph (A) of this rule.

(2) Upon submittal of amendments to the
registration of an existing class II composting facility, the owner or operator
shall review and make appropriate revisions to the closure cost estimate in
accordance with paragraph (A) of this rule.

(D) The owner or operator of a class I or class II
composting facility shall ensure financial assurance instruments account for
increases in the closure cost estimate, and shall ensure that sufficient
financial assurance is available for closure activities at all times during the
operating life of the composting facility.

(E) Ohio EPA may require revisions to the
closure cost estimate or to the closure financial assurance instrument if the
director determines that the operational capacity has increased or that the
cost of closure exceeds the closure cost estimate.

(F) If the closure cost estimate is five thousand five
hundred dollars or less, no financial assurance is required.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 8 pages

e-filed on 12/09/2014 at 10:09 AM in Wayne County, Ohio IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS WAYNE COUNTY, OHIO The Board of Health of the Wayne County : Case No. 2014 CVC-H 00343 Combined General Health District : Plaintiff, : Judge: Mark K. Wiest v. : Philip R. Cehrs : MOTION FOR CONTEMPT Defendant. : Now comes Plaintiff, the Board of Health of the Wayne County Combined General Health District, by and through the undersigned Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and respectfully requests this Court for …

County

Wayne County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 09, 2014

Category

OTHER CIVIL

Judge Hon. WIEST, MARK K Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for WIEST, MARK K
preview-icon 8 pages

R. KYLE WITT FAIRFIELD COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 239 W. Main Street Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 (740) 652-7560 (614) 322-5265 F: (740) 653-4708 ORIGINAL Amy Brown-Thompson (0070511) Steven Darnell (0098940) Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys Fairfield Cotinty Prosecutor's Office 239 West Main Street, Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 Phone 740-652-7560 | Fax 740-653-4708 Amy.Brown-Thompson@fairfieldcountyohio.gov Attorney for the Fairfield County Board of Health IN COMPUTER 1023 HAR 3…

Case Filed

Mar 30, 2023

Case Status

Closed

County

Fairfield County, OH

Filed Date

Mar 30, 2023

Category

(CV) CIVIL

Judge Hon. BERENS, RICHARD E Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for BERENS, RICHARD E
preview-icon 3 pages

| (a ttinvnnenn FLED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 2006 NOY -B PH 2:50 BAR EDEEY CLERK GF COURTS - MONTGOMERY £0., OHIO poe IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO BLANE SCARBERRY, et al. : CASE NO. 05-8403 “ (Judge Mary Katherine Huffman) Plaintiffs vs. : DEFENDANT THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE, OHIO'S THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE,: DESIGNATION OF TRIAL OHIO MATERIALS Defendant Pursuant to Mont. Co. C.P.R. 2.01(V)(D)(2)(d) and this Court’s Order, Defendant The Village of Farmersville,…

Case Filed

Nov 02, 2005

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Nov 08, 2006

Category

OTHER TORT

preview-icon 6 pages

COPY. con ZALESN! COURT OF COMMON PLEAS . CIVIL DIVISION ous DEC“ PHI 32 SUMMIT COUNTY siat STATE OF OHIO MARY SLIWINSKL, et al No. 2006 02 0884 : JUDGE COSGROVE vs. PLAINTIFE’S SECOND AMENDED REPLY TO DEFENDANT MOTION TO CAPITAL PROPERTIES DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MANAGEMENT LTD., et al. AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs re-amend their Reply in a single aspect because of the recently discovered ruling of the Ohio EPA that Defendants are a Public Water System that must comply with the law and reg…

County

Summit County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 04, 2006

Category

BREACH OF AGREEMENT

Judge

PATRICIA A COSGROVE

preview-icon 6 pages

SKELTON, McQUISTON, GOUNARIS & HENRY ATTORNEYS AT LAW First National Plaza 130 W. Second Street Suite 1818 Dayton, Ohio 45402 (937) 226-1212 Fax (937) 226-1224 MOT PLEAS OF U3 Pit 3: 30 IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE : Case No. 07-CV-3366 COMPANY (J. Kessler) Plaintiff DEFENDANT FINDLAY HOTELS, -vs- : INC.’S COUNTERCLAIM DRURY HOTELS CORP, et al. Defendants Now comes Defendant, Findlay Hotels, Inc. (hereinafter “Findlay”), throu…

Case Filed

Apr 23, 2007

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Jun 13, 2007

Category

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope