Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 3745-55-43 | Financial assurance for facility closure.

                                                

An owner or operator of each facility shall
establish financial assurance for closure of the facility. The owner or
operator shall choose from among the following options:

(A) Closure trust fund.

(1) An owner or operator
may satisfy the requirements of this rule by establishing a closure trust fund
which conforms to the requirements of paragraph (A) of this rule and submitting
an originally signed duplicate of the trust agreement to the director. An owner
or operator of a new facility shall send the originally signed duplicate of the
trust agreement to the director at least sixty days before the date on which
hazardous waste is first received for treatment, storage, or disposal. The
trustee shall be an entity which has the authority to act as a trustee and
whose trust operations are regulated and examined by a federal or state
agency.

(2) The wording of the
trust agreement shall be identical to the wording specified in paragraph (A)(1)
of rule 3745-55-51 of the Administrative Code and the trust agreement shall be
accompanied by a formal certification of acknowledgement. [For example, see
paragraph (A)(2) of rule 3745-55-51 of the Administrative Code.] "Schedule
A" of the trust agreement shall be updated within sixty days after a
change in the amount of the current closure cost estimate covered by the
agreement.

(3) Payments to the trust
fund shall be made annually by the owner or operator over the term of the
initial hazardous waste permit or over the remaining operating life of the
facility as estimated in the closure plan, whichever period is shorter. This
period is hereafter referred to as the "pay-in period." The payments
into the closure trust fund shall be made as follows:

(a) For a new facility, the first payment shall be made before
the initial receipt of hazardous waste for treatment, storage, or disposal. A
receipt from the trustee for this payment shall be submitted by the owner or
operator to the director before this initial receipt of hazardous waste. The
first payment shall be at least equal to the current closure cost estimate (see
rule 3745-55-42 of the Administrative Code) except as provided in paragraph (G)
of this rule, divided by the number of years in the pay-in period. Subsequent
payments shall be made no later than thirty days after each anniversary date of
the first payment. The amount of each subsequent payment shall be determined by
this formula:

Next payment = (CE - CV) / Y

Where CE is the current closure cost
estimate, CV is the current value of the trust fund, and Y is the number of
years remaining in the pay-in period.

(b) If an owner or operator establishes a trust fund as specified
in paragraph (A) of this rule, and the value of that trust fund is less than
the current closure cost estimate when a permit is issued to the facility, the
amount of the current closure cost estimate still to be paid into the trust
fund shall be paid in over the pay-in period as described in paragraph (A)(3)
of this rule. Payments shall continue to be made no later than thirty days
after each anniversary date of the first payment made pursuant to Chapters
3745-65 to 3745-69 and 3745-256 of the Administrative Code. The amount of each
payment must be determined by this formula:

Next payment = (CE - CV) / Y

Where CE is the current closure cost
estimate, CV is the current value of the trust fund, and Y is the number of
years remaining in the pay-in period.

(4) The owner or operator
may accelerate payments unto the trust fund or the owner or operator may
deposit the full amount of the current closure cost estimate at the time the
trust fund is established. However, the owner or operator shall maintain the
value of the trust fund at no less than the value the trust fund would have if
annual payments were made as specified in paragraph (A)(3) of this
rule.

(5) If the owner or
operator establishes a closure trust fund after having used one or more
alternate mechanisms specified in this rule or in rule 3745-66-43 of the
Administrative Code, the owner's or operator's first payment shall be
in at least the amount that the trust fund would contain if the trust fund were
established initially and annual payments made according to paragraph (A)(3) of
this rule and paragraph (A) of rule 3745-66-43 of the Administrative Code, as
applicable.

(6) After the pay-in
period is completed, whenever the current closure cost estimate changes, the
owner or operator shall compare the new estimate with the trustee's most
recent annual valuation of the trust fund. If the value of the trust fund is
less than the amount of the new estimate, the owner or operator, within sixty
days after the change in the cost estimate, either shall deposit an amount into
the trust fund so that the value of the trust fund after this deposit at least
equals the amount of the current closure cost estimate, or obtain other
financial assurance as specified in this rule to cover the
difference.

(7) If the value of the
trust fund is greater than the total amount of the current closure cost
estimate, the owner or operator may submit a written request to the director
for release of the amount in excess of the current closure cost
estimate.

(8) If an owner or
operator substitutes other financial assurance as specified in this rule for
all or part of the trust fund, the owner or operator may submit a written
request to the director for release of the amount in excess of the current
closure cost estimate covered by the trust fund.

(9) Within sixty days
after receiving a request from the owner or operator for release of funds as
specified in paragraph (A)(7) or (A)(8) of this rule, the director will
instruct the trustee to release to the owner or operator such funds as the
director specifies in writing.

(10) After beginning
partial or final closure, an owner or operator or another person authorized to
conduct partial or final closure may request reimbursement for partial or final
closure expenditures by submitting itemized bills to the director. The owner or
operator may request reimbursements for partial closure only if sufficient
funds are remaining in the trust fund to cover the maximum costs of closing the
facility over the remaining operating life of the facility. Within sixty days
after receiving bills for partial or final closure activities, the director
will determine whether the partial or final closure expenditures are in
accordance with the approved closure plan or are otherwise justified, and if
so, the director will instruct the trustee to make reimbursement in such
amounts as the director specifies in writing. If the director has reason to
believe that the maximum cost of closure over the remaining operating life of
the facility will be significantly greater than the value of the trust fund,
the director may withhold reimbursement of such amounts as the director deems
prudent until the director determines, in accordance with paragraph (I) of this
rule, that the owner or operator is no longer required to maintain financial
assurance for final closure of the facility. If the director does not instruct
the trustee to make such reimbursements, the director will provide the owner or
operator with a detailed written statement of reasons.

(11) The director will
agree to termination of the trust when either:

(a) The owner or operator substitutes alternate financial
assurance as specified in this rule.

(b) The director releases the owner or operator from the
requirements of this rule in accordance with paragraph (I) of this
rule.

(B) Surety bond guaranteeing payment into
a closure trust fund.

(1) An owner or operator
may satisfy the requirements of this rule by obtaining a surety bond which
conforms to the requirements of paragraph (B) of this rule and submitting the
bond to the director. An owner or operator of a new facility shall submit the
surety bond to the director at least sixty days before the date on which
hazardous waste is first received for treatment, storage, or disposal. The bond
shall be effective before this initial receipt of hazardous waste. At a
minimum, the surety company issuing the bond shall be among those listed as
acceptable sureties on federal bonds in "Circular 570" of the U.S.
department of the treasury.

[Comment: "Circular 570" is published
in the Federal Register annually on July first. Interim changes in the circular
are also published in the Federal Register.]

(2) The wording of the
surety bond shall be identical to the wording specified in paragraph (B) of
rule 3745-55-51 of the Administrative Code.

(3) The owner or operator
who uses a surety bond to satisfy the requirements of this rule also shall
establish a standby trust fund by the time the bond is obtained. Under the
terms of the bond, all payments made thereunder will be deposited by the surety
directly into the standby trust fund in accordance with instructions from the
director. This standby trust fund shall meet the requirements specified in
paragraph (A) of this rule, except that:

(a) An originally signed duplicate of the trust agreement shall
be submitted to the director with the surety bond; and

(b) Until the standby trust fund is funded pursuant to this rule,
the following are not required:

(i) Payments into the
trust fund as specified in paragraph (A) of this rule;

(ii) Updating of
"Schedule A" of the trust agreement [see paragraph (A) of rule
3745-55-51 of the Administrative Code] to show current closure cost
estimates;

(iii) Annual valuations
as required by the trust agreement; and

(iv) Notices of
nonpayment as required by the trust agreement.

(4) The bond shall
guarantee that the owner or operator will:

(a) Fund the standby trust fund in an amount equal to the penal
sum of the bond before the beginning of final closure of the facility;
or

(b) Fund the standby trust fund in an amount equal to the penal
sum within fifteen days after an order to begin final closure in accordance
with rules 3745-55-10 to 3745-55-20 of the Administrative Code is issued by the
director, or by an Ohio court, or other court of competent jurisdiction, or by
a U.S. district court, or within fifteen days after issuance of a notice or
revocation of the permit by the director; or

(c) Provide alternate financial assurance as specified in this
rule, and obtain the director's written approval of the assurance
provided, within ninety days after receipt by both the owner or operator and
the director of a notice of cancellation of the bond from the
surety.

(5) Under the terms of
the bond, the surety will become liable on the bond obligation when the owner
or operator fails to perform as guaranteed by the bond. After a determination
by the director that the owner or operator has failed to perform final closure
in accordance with the approved closure plan and other permit requirements when
required to do so, under the terms of the bond the surety will perform final
closure as guaranteed by the bond, or will deposit the amount of the penal sum
into the standby trust fund.

(6) The penal sum of the
bond shall be in an amount at least equal to the current closure cost estimate
(see rule 3745-55-42 of the Administrative Code) except as provided in
paragraph (G) of this rule.

(7) Whenever the current
closure cost estimate increases to an amount greater than the penal sum, the
owner or operator, within sixty days after the increase, either shall cause the
penal sum to be increased to an amount at least equal to the current closure
cost estimate and submit evidence of such increase to the director, or shall
obtain other financial assurance as specified in this rule to cover the
increase. Whenever the current closure cost estimate decreases, the penal sum
may be reduced to the amount of the current closure cost estimate following
written approval by the director.

(8) Under the terms of
the bond, the surety may cancel the bond by sending notice of cancellation by
certified mail to the owner or operator and to the director. Cancellation may
not occur, however, during the one hundred twenty days beginning on the date of
receipt of the notice of cancellation by both the owner or operator and the
director, as evidenced by the return receipts.

(9) The owner or operator
may cancel the bond if the director has given prior written consent based on
the director's receipt of evidence of alternate financial assurance as
specified in this rule.

(C) Surety bond guaranteeing performance
of closure.

(1) An owner or operator
may satisfy the requirements of this rule by obtaining a surety bond which
conforms to the requirements of paragraph (C) of this rule and submitting the
bond to the director. An owner or operator of a new facility shall submit the
bond to the director at least sixty days before the date on which hazardous
waste is first received for treatment, storage, or disposal. The bond shall be
effective before this initial receipt of hazardous waste. At a minimum, the
surety company issuing the bond shall be among those listed as acceptable
sureties on federal bonds in "Circular 570" of the U.S. department of
the treasury.

[Comment: "Circular 570" is published
in the Federal Register annually on July first. Interim changes in the circular
are also published in the Federal Register.]

(2) The wording of the
surety bond shall be identical to the wording specified in paragraph (C) of
rule 3745-55-51 of the Administrative Code.

(3) The owner or operator
who uses a surety bond to satisfy the requirements of this rule also shall
establish a standby trust fund. Under the terms of the bond, all payments made
thereunder will be deposited by the surety directly into the standby trust fund
in accordance with instructions from the director. This standby trust shall
meet the requirements specified in paragraph (A) of this rule, except
that:

(a) An originally signed duplicate of the trust agreement shall
be submitted to the director with the surety bond; and

(b) Unless the standby trust fund is funded pursuant to this
rule, the following are not required:

(i) Payments into the
trust fund as specified in paragraph (A) of this rule;

(ii) Updating of
"Schedule A" of the trust agreement [see paragraph (A) of rule
3745-55-51 of the Administrative Code] to show current closure cost
estimates;

(iii) Annual valuations
as required by the trust agreement; and

(iv) Notices of
nonpayment as required by the trust agreement.

(4) The bond shall
guarantee that the owner or operator will either:

(a) Perform final closure in accordance with the closure plan and
other requirements of the permit for the facility whenever required to do
so.

(b) Provide alternate financial assurance as specified in this
rule, and obtain the director's written approval of the assurance
provided, within ninety days after receipt by both the owner or operator and
the director of a notice of cancellation of the bond from the
surety.

(5) Under the terms of
the bond, the surety will become liable on the bond obligation when the owner
or operator fails to perform as guaranteed by the bond. After a determination
pursuant to Chapter 3734. of the Revised Code or Section 3008 of RCRA that the
owner or operator has failed to perform final closure in accordance with the
approved closure plan and other permit requirements when required to do so,
under the terms of the bond the surety will perform final closure as guaranteed
by the bond or will deposit the amount of the penal sum into the standby trust
fund.

(6) The penal sum of the
bond shall be in an amount at least equal to the amount of the current closure
cost estimate (see rule 3745-55-42 of the Administrative Code).

(7) Whenever the current
closure cost estimate increases to an amount greater than the amount of the
penal sum, the owner or operator, within sixty days after the increase, either
shall cause the penal sum of the bond to be increased to an amount at least
equal to the current closure cost estimate and submit evidence of such increase
to the director, or shall obtain other financial assurance as specified in this
rule. Whenever the current closure cost estimate decreases, the penal sum may
be reduced to the amount of the current closure cost estimate following written
approval by the director.

(8) Under the terms of
the bond, the surety may cancel the bond by sending notice of cancellation by
certified mail to the owner or operator and to the director. Cancellation may
not occur, however, during the one hundred twenty days beginning on the date of
receipt of the notice of cancellation by both the owner or operator and the
director, as evidenced by return receipts.

(9) The owner or operator
may cancel the bond if the director has given prior written consent. The
director will provide such written consent when either:

(a) An owner or operator provides alternate financial assurance
as specified in this rule.

(b) The director releases the owner or operator from the
requirements of this rule in accordance with paragraph (I) of this
rule.

(10) The surety will not
be liable for deficiencies in the performance of closure by the owner or
operator after the director releases the owner or operator from the
requirements of this rule in accordance with paragraph (I) of this
rule.

(D) Closure letter of
credit.

(1) An owner or operator
may satisfy the requirements of this rule by obtaining an irrevocable standby
letter of credit which conforms to the requirements of paragraph (D) of this
rule and by submitting the letter to the director. An owner or operator of a
new facility shall submit the letter of credit to the director at least sixty
days before the date on which hazardous waste is first received for treatment,
storage, or disposal. The letter of credit shall be effective before this
initial receipt of hazardous waste. The issuing institution shall be an entity
which has the authority to issue letters of credit and whose letter of credit
operations are regulated and examined by a federal or state
agency.

(2) The wording of the
letter of credit shall be identical to the wording specified in paragraph (D)
of rule 3745-55-51 of the Administrative Code.

(3) An owner or operator
who uses a letter of credit to satisfy the requirements of this rule also shall
establish a standby trust fund. Under the terms of the letter of credit, all
amounts paid pursuant to a draft by the director will be deposited by the
issuing institution directly into the standby trust fund in accordance with
instruction from the director. This standby trust fund shall meet the
requirements of the trust fund specified in paragraph (A) of this rule, except
that:

(a) An originally signed duplicate of the trust agreement shall
be submitted to the director with the letter of credit; and

(b) Unless the standby trust fund is funded pursuant to this
rule, the following are not required:

(i) Payments into the
trust fund as specified in paragraph (A) of this rule;

(ii) Updating of
"Schedule A" of the trust agreement [see paragraph (A) of rule
3745-55-51 of the Administrative Code] to show current closure
estimates;

(iii) Annual valuations
as required by the trust agreement; and

(iv) Notices of
nonpayment as required by the trust agreement.

(4) The letter of credit
shall be accompanied by a letter from the owner or operator referring to the
letter of credit by number, issuing institution, and date, and providing the
U.S. EPA identification number, name and address of the facility, and the
amount of funds assured for closure of the facility by the letter of
credit.

(5) The letter of credit
shall be irrevocable and issued for a period of at least one year. The letter
of credit shall provide that the expiration date will be automatically extended
for a period of at least one year unless, at least one hundred twenty days
before the current expiration date, the issuing institution notifies both the
owner or operator and the director by certified mail of a decision not to
extend the expiration date. Under the terms of the letter of credit, the one
hundred twenty days begin on the date when both the owner or operator and the
director have received the notice, as evidenced by the return
receipts.

(6) The letter of credit
shall be issued in an amount at least equal to the current closure cost
estimate, except as provided in paragraph (G) of this rule.

(7) Whenever the current
closure cost estimate increases to an amount greater than the amount of the
credit, the owner or operator, within sixty days after the increase, either
shall cause the amount of the credit to be increased so that the amount of the
credit at least equals the current closure cost estimate and submit evidence of
such increase to the director, or shall obtain other financial assurance as
specified in this rule to cover the increase. Whenever the current closure cost
estimate decreases, the amount of the letter of credit may be reduced to the
amount of the current closure cost estimate after written approval by the
director.

(8) After a determination
pursuant to Chapter 3734. of the Revised Code or Section 3008 of the RCRA that
the owner or operator has failed to perform final closure in accordance with
the closure plan and other permit requirements when required to do so, the
director may draw on the letter of credit.

(9) If the owner or
operator does not establish alternate financial assurance as specified in this
rule and obtain written approval of such alternate assurance from the director
within ninety days after the receipt by both the owner or operator and the
director of a notice from the issuing institution that the issuing institution
decided not to extend the letter of credit beyond the current expiration date,
the director will draw on the letter of credit. The director may delay the
drawing if the issuing institution grants an extension of the term of the
credit. During the last thirty days of any such extension, the director will
draw on the letter of credit if the owner or operator has failed to provide
alternate financial assurance as specified in this rule and obtain written
approval of such assurance from the director.

(10) The director will
return the letter of credit to the issuing institution for termination when
either:

(a) The owner or operator substitutes alternate financial
assurance as specified in this rule; or

(b) The director releases the owner or operator from the
requirements of this rule in accordance with paragraph (I) of this
rule.

(E) Closure insurance.

(1) An owner or operator
may satisfy the requirements of this rule by obtaining closure insurance which
conforms to the requirements of paragraph (E) of this rule and submitting a
certificate of such insurance to the director. An owner or operator of a new
facility shall submit the certificate of insurance to the director at least
sixty days before the date on which hazardous waste is first received for
treatment, storage, or disposal. The insurance shall be effective before this
initial receipt of hazardous waste. At a minimum, the insurer shall be licensed
to transact the business of insurance or eligible to provide insurance as an
excess or surplus lines insurer in one or more states.

(2) The wording of the
certificate of insurance shall be identical to the wording specified in
paragraph (E) of rule 3745-55-51 of the Administrative Code.

(3) The closure insurance
policy shall be issued for a face amount at least equal to the current closure
cost estimate, except as provided in paragraph (G) of this rule. The term
"face amount" means the total amount the insurer is obligated to pay
under the policy. Actual payments by the insurer will not change the face
amount, although the insurer's future liability will be lowered by the
amount of the payments.

(4) The closure insurance
policy shall guarantee that funds will be available to close the facility
whenever final closure occurs. The policy also shall guarantee that once final
closure begins, the insurer will be responsible for paying out funds, up to an
amount equal to the face amount of the policy, upon the direction of the
director, to such party or parties as the director specifies.

(5) After beginning
partial or final closure, an owner or operator or any other person authorized
to conduct closure may request reimbursement for closure expenditures by
submitting itemized bills to the director. The owner or operator may request
reimbursement for partial closure only if the remaining value of the policy is
sufficient to cover the maximum costs of closing the facility over the
remaining operating life of the facility. Within sixty days after receiving
bills for closure activities, the director will determine whether the partial
or final closure expenditures are in accordance with the approved closure plan
or otherwise justified, and if so, the director will instruct the insurer to
make reimbursement in such amounts as the director specifies in writing. If the
director has reason to believe that the maximum cost of closure over the
remaining operating life of the facility will be significantly greater than the
face amount of the policy, the director may withhold reimbursement of such
amounts as the director deems prudent until the director determines, in
accordance with paragraph (I) of this rule, that the owner or operator is no
longer required to maintain financial assurance for final closure of the
facility. If the director does not instruct the insurer to make such
reimbursements, the director will provide the owner or operator with a detailed
written statement of reasons.

(6) The owner or operator
shall maintain the policy in full force and effect until the director consents
to termination of the policy by the owner or operator as specified in paragraph
(E)(10) of this rule. Failure to pay the premium, without substitution of
alternate financial assurance as specified in this rule, will constitute a
significant violation, warranting such remedy as the director deems necessary.
Such violation will be deemed to begin upon receipt by the director of a notice
of future cancellation, termination, or failure to renew due to nonpayment of
the premium, rather than upon the date of expiration.

(7) Each policy shall
contain a provision allowing assignment of the policy to a successor owner or
operator. Such assignment may be conditional upon consent of the insurer,
provided such consent is not unreasonably refused.

(8) The policy shall
provide that the insurer may not cancel, terminate, or fail to renew the policy
except for failure to pay the premium. At a minimum, the automatic renewal of
the policy shall provide the insured with the option of renewal at the face
amount of the expiring policy. If there is a failure to pay the premium, the
insurer may elect to cancel, terminate, or fail to renew the policy by sending
notice by certified mail to the owner or operator and the director.
Cancellation, termination, or failure to renew may not occur, however, during
the one hundred twenty days beginning with the date of receipt of the notice by
both the director and the owner or operator, as evidenced by the return
receipts. Cancellation, termination, or failure to renew may not occur and the
policy will remain in full force and effect in the event that on or before the
date of expiration:

(a) The director deems the facility abandoned; or

(b) The permit is terminated or revoked or a new permit is
denied; or

(c) Closure is ordered by the director or a U.S. district court
or other court of competent jurisdiction; or

(d) The owner or operator is named as debtor in a voluntary or
involuntary proceeding under Title 11 (bankruptcy), U.S. Code; or

(e) The premium due is paid.

(9) Whenever the current
closure cost estimate increases to an amount greater than the face amount of
the policy, the owner or operator, within sixty days after the increase, either
shall cause the face amount to be increased to an amount at least equal to the
current closure cost estimate and submit evidence of such increase to the
director, or shall obtain other financial assurance as specified in this rule
to cover the increase. Whenever the current closure cost estimate decreases,
the face amount may be reduced to the amount of the current closure cost
estimate after written approval by the director.

(10) The director will
give written consent to the owner or operator that the owner or operator may
terminate the insurance policy when either:

(a) An owner or operator substitutes alternate financial
assurance as specified in this rule.

(b) The director releases the owner or operator from the
requirements of this rule in accordance with paragraph (I) of this
rule.

(F) Financial test and corporate
guarantee for closure.

(1) An owner or operator
may satisfy the requirements of this rule by demonstrating that the owner or
operator passes a financial test as specified in paragraph (F) of this rule. To
pass this test, the owner or operator shall meet the criteria of either
paragraph (F)(1)(a) or (F)(1)(b) of this rule.

(a) The owner or operator shall have:

(i) Two of the following
three ratios: a ratio of total liabilities to net worth less than 2.0; a ratio
of the sum of net income plus depreciation, depletion, and amortization to
total liabilities greater than 0.1; and a ratio of current assets to current
liabilities greater than 1.5; and

(ii) Net working capital
and tangible net worth each at least six times the sum of the current closure
and post-closure cost estimates and the current plugging and abandonment cost
estimates; and

(iii) Tangible net worth
of at least ten million dollars: and

(iv) Assets located in
the United States amounting to at least ninety per cent of total assets or at
least six times the sum of the current closure and post-closure cost estimates
and the current plugging and abandonment cost estimates.

(b) The owner or operator shall have:

(i) A current rating for
the owner's or operator's most recent bond issuance of "AAA, AA,
A, or BBB" as issued by "Standard and Poor's" or "Aaa,
Aa, A, or Baa" as issued by "Moody's"; and

(ii) Tangible net worth
at least six times the sum of the current closure and post-closure cost
estimates and the current plugging and abandonment cost estimates;
and

(iii) Tangible net worth
of at least ten million dollars; and

(iv) Assets located in
the United States amounting to at least ninety per cent of the owner's or
operator's total assets or at least six times the sum of the current
closure and post-closure cost estimates and the current plugging and
abandonment cost estimates.

(2) The phrase
"current closure and post-closure cost estimates" as used in
paragraph (F)(1) of this rule refers to the cost estimates required to be shown
in paragraphs one through four of the letter from the owner's or
operator's chief financial officer [paragraph (F) of rule 3745-55-51 of
the Administrative Code]. The phrase "current plugging and abandonment
cost estimates" as used in paragraph (F)(1) of this rule refers to the
cost estimates required to be shown in paragraphs one through four of the
letter from the owner's or operator's chief financial officer [see
paragraph (F) of rule 3745-55-51 of the Administrative Code].

(3) To demonstrate that
the owner or operator meets this test, the owner or operator shall submit the
following items to the director:

(a) A letter signed by the owner's or operator's chief
financial officer and worded as specified in paragraph (F) of rule 3745-55-51
of the Administrative Code; and

(b) A copy of the independent certified public accountant's
report on examination of the owner's or operator's financial
statements for the latest completed fiscal year; and

(c) A special report from the owner's or operator's
independent certified public accountant to the owner or operator stating
that:

(i) The accountant has
compared the data which the letter from the chief financial officer specifies
as having been derived from the independently audited year-end financial
statements for the latest fiscal year with the amounts in such financial
statements; and

(ii) In connection with
that procedure, no matters came to the accountant's attention which caused
the accountant to believe that the specified data should be
adjusted.

(4) An owner or operator
of a new facility shall submit the items specified in paragraph (F)(3) of this
rule to the director at least sixty days before the date on which hazardous
waste is first received for treatment, storage, or disposal.

(5) After the initial
submittal of items specified in paragraph (F)(3) of this rule, the owner or
operator shall send updated information to the director within ninety days
after the close of each succeeding fiscal year. This information shall consist
of all three items specified in paragraph (F)(3) of this rule.

(6) If the owner or
operator no longer meets the requirements of paragraph (F)(1) of this rule, the
owner or operator shall send notice to the director of intent to establish
alternate financial assurance as specified in this rule. The notice shall be
sent by certified mail within ninety days after the end of the fiscal year for
which the year-end financial data show that the owner or operator no longer
meets the requirements. The owner or operator shall provide the alternate
financial assurance within one hundred twenty days after the end of such fiscal
year.

(7) The director, based
on a reasonable belief that the owner or operator may no longer meet the
requirements of paragraph (F)(1) of this rule, may require reports of financial
condition at any time from the owner or operator in addition to those specified
in paragraph (F)(3) of this rule. If the director finds, on the basis of such
reports or other information, that the owner or operator no longer meets the
requirements of paragraph (F)(1) of this rule, the owner or operator shall
provide alternate financial assurance as specified in this rule within thirty
days after notification of such a finding.

(8) The director may
disallow use of this test on the basis of qualifications in the opinion
expressed by the independent certified public accountant in the
accountant's report on examination of the owner's or operator's
financial statements [see paragraph (F)(3)(b) of this rule]. An adverse opinion
or a disclaimer of opinion will be cause for disallowance. The director will
evaluate other qualifications on an individual basis. The owner or operator
shall provide alternate financial assurance as specified in this rule within
thirty days after notification of the disallowance.

(9) The owner or operator
is no longer required to submit the items specified in paragraph (F)(3) of this
rule when either:

(a) An owner or operator substitutes alternate financial
assurance as specified in this rule.

(b) The director releases the owner or operator from the
requirements of this rule in accordance with paragraph (I) of this
rule.

(10) An owner or operator
may meet the requirements of this rule by obtaining a written guarantee. The
guarantor shall be the direct or higher-tier parent corporation of the owner or
operator, a firm whose parent corporation is also the parent corporation of the
owner or operator, or a firm with a "substantial business
relationship" with the owner or operator. The guarantor shall meet the
requirements for owners or operators in paragraphs (F)(1) to (F)(8) of this
rule and shall comply with the terms of the guarantee. The wording of the
guarantee shall be identical to the wording specified in paragraph (H) of rule
3745-55-51 of the Administrative Code. A certified copy of the guarantee shall
accompany the items sent to the director as specified in paragraph (F)(3) of
this rule. One of these items shall be the letter from the guarantor's
chief financial officer. If the guarantor's parent corporation is also the
parent corporation of the owner or operator, the letter shall describe the
value received in consideration of the guarantee. If the guarantor is a firm
with a "substantial business relationship" with the owner or
operator, this letter shall describe this "substantial business
relationship" with and the value received in consideration of the
guarantee. The terms of the guarantee shall provide that:

(a) If the owner or operator fails to perform final closure of a
facility covered by the corporate guarantee in accordance with the closure plan
and other permit requirements whenever required to do so, the guarantor will do
so or establish a trust fund as specified in paragraph (A) of this rule in the
name of the owner or operator.

(b) The corporate guarantee will remain in force unless the
guarantor sends notice of cancellation by certified mail to the owner or
operator and to the director. Cancellation may not occur, however, during the
one hundred twenty days beginning on the date of receipt of the notice of
cancellation by both the owner or operator and the director, as evidenced by
the return receipts.

(c) If the owner or operator fails to provide alternate financial
assurance as specified in this rule and obtain the written approval of such
alternate assurance from the director within ninety days after receipt by both
the owner or operator and the director of a notice of cancellation of the
corporate guarantee from the guarantor, the guarantor will provide such
alternative financial assurance in the name of the owner or
operator.

(G) Use of multiple financial mechanisms.
An owner or operator may satisfy the requirements of this rule by establishing
more than one financial mechanism per facility. These mechanisms are limited to
trust funds, surety bonds guaranteeing payment into a trust fund, letters of
credit, and insurance. The mechanisms shall be as specified in paragraphs (A),
(B), (D), and (E) of this rule, except that it is the combination of
mechanisms, rather than the single mechanism, which shall provide financial
assurance for an amount at least equal to the current closure cost estimate. If
an owner or operator uses a trust fund in combination with a surety bond or
letter of credit, the owner or operator may use the trust fund as the standby
trust fund for the other mechanisms. A single standby trust may be established
for two or more mechanisms. The director may use any or all of the mechanisms
to provide for closure of the facility.

(H) Use of a financial mechanism for
multiple facilities. An owner or operator may use a financial assurance
mechanism specified in this rule to meet the requirements of this rule for more
than one facility. Evidence of financial assurance submitted to the director
shall include a list showing, for each facility, the U.S. EPA identification
number, name, address, and the amount of funds for closure assured by the
mechanism. If the facilities covered by the mechanism are in more than one U.S.
EPA region, identical evidence of financial assurance shall be submitted to and
maintained with the U.S. EPA regional administrators of all such regions or the
directors of state programs in states authorized to administer such programs.
The amount of funds available through the mechanism shall be no less than the
sum of funds that would be available if a separate mechanism had been
established and maintained for each facility. In directing funds available
through the mechanism for closure of any of the facilities covered by the
mechanism, the director may direct only the amount of funds designated for that
facility, unless the owner or operator agrees to the use of additional funds
available under the mechanism.

(I) Release of the owner or operator from
the requirements of this rule. Within sixty days after receiving certifications
from the owner or operator and a qualified professional engineer that final
closure has been completed in accordance with the approved closure plan, the
director will notify the owner or operator in writing that the owner or
operator is no longer required by this rule to maintain financial assurance for
closure of the facility, unless the director has reason to believe that final
closure has not been in accordance with the approved closure plan. The director
will provide the owner or operator a detailed written statement of any such
reason to believe that closure has not been in accordance with the approved
closure plan.

[Comment 1: The notice releases the owner or
operator only from requirements for financial assurance for closure of the
facility. The notice does not release the owner or operator from legal
responsibility for meeting the closure standards.]

[Comment 2: For dates of non-regulatory government
publications, publications of recognized organizations and associations,
federal rules, and federal statutory provisions referenced in this rule, see
rule 3745-50-11 of the Administrative Code titled "Incorporated by
reference."]



Last updated September 29, 2021 at 8:51 AM


View Latest Documents

preview-icon 8 pages

e-filed on 12/09/2014 at 10:09 AM in Wayne County, Ohio IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS WAYNE COUNTY, OHIO The Board of Health of the Wayne County : Case No. 2014 CVC-H 00343 Combined General Health District : Plaintiff, : Judge: Mark K. Wiest v. : Philip R. Cehrs : MOTION FOR CONTEMPT Defendant. : Now comes Plaintiff, the Board of Health of the Wayne County Combined General Health District, by and through the undersigned Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and respectfully requests this Court for …

County

Wayne County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 09, 2014

Category

OTHER CIVIL

Judge Hon. WIEST, MARK K Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for WIEST, MARK K
preview-icon 8 pages

R. KYLE WITT FAIRFIELD COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 239 W. Main Street Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 (740) 652-7560 (614) 322-5265 F: (740) 653-4708 ORIGINAL Amy Brown-Thompson (0070511) Steven Darnell (0098940) Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys Fairfield Cotinty Prosecutor's Office 239 West Main Street, Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 Phone 740-652-7560 | Fax 740-653-4708 Amy.Brown-Thompson@fairfieldcountyohio.gov Attorney for the Fairfield County Board of Health IN COMPUTER 1023 HAR 3…

Case Filed

Mar 30, 2023

Case Status

Closed

County

Fairfield County, OH

Filed Date

Mar 30, 2023

Category

(CV) CIVIL

Judge Hon. BERENS, RICHARD E Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for BERENS, RICHARD E
preview-icon 6 pages

COPY. con ZALESN! COURT OF COMMON PLEAS . CIVIL DIVISION ous DEC“ PHI 32 SUMMIT COUNTY siat STATE OF OHIO MARY SLIWINSKL, et al No. 2006 02 0884 : JUDGE COSGROVE vs. PLAINTIFE’S SECOND AMENDED REPLY TO DEFENDANT MOTION TO CAPITAL PROPERTIES DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MANAGEMENT LTD., et al. AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs re-amend their Reply in a single aspect because of the recently discovered ruling of the Ohio EPA that Defendants are a Public Water System that must comply with the law and reg…

County

Summit County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 04, 2006

Category

BREACH OF AGREEMENT

Judge

PATRICIA A COSGROVE

preview-icon 3 pages

| (a ttinvnnenn FLED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 2006 NOY -B PH 2:50 BAR EDEEY CLERK GF COURTS - MONTGOMERY £0., OHIO poe IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO BLANE SCARBERRY, et al. : CASE NO. 05-8403 “ (Judge Mary Katherine Huffman) Plaintiffs vs. : DEFENDANT THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE, OHIO'S THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE,: DESIGNATION OF TRIAL OHIO MATERIALS Defendant Pursuant to Mont. Co. C.P.R. 2.01(V)(D)(2)(d) and this Court’s Order, Defendant The Village of Farmersville,…

Case Filed

Nov 02, 2005

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Nov 08, 2006

Category

OTHER TORT

preview-icon 6 pages

SKELTON, McQUISTON, GOUNARIS & HENRY ATTORNEYS AT LAW First National Plaza 130 W. Second Strect Suite 1818 Dayton, Ohio 45402 (937) 226-1212 Fax (937) 226-1224 IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE : Case No. 07-CV-3366 COMPANY (J. Kessler) Plaintiff -Vvs- : DEFENDANT FINDLAY HOTELS. INC.’S CROSS-CLAIM AGAINST DRURY HOTELS CORP, et al. : DEFENDANT DRURY HOTELS CORP. Defendants Now comes Defendant, Findlay Hotels, Inc. (herein…

Case Filed

Apr 23, 2007

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Jun 13, 2007

Category

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope