Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
Except as rule 3745-54-01 of the Administrative Code provides otherwise:
(A) Rules 3745-55-11 to 3745-55-15 of the Administrative Code (which concern closure) apply to the owners and operators of all hazardous waste management facilities; and
(B) Rule 3745-55-16 to 3745-55-20 of the Administrative Code (which concern post-closure care) apply to the owners and operators of:
(1) All hazardous waste disposal facilities;
(2) Waste piles and surface impoundments from which the owner or operator intends to remove the wastes at closure to the extent that rules 3745-55-10 to 3745-55-20 of the Administrative Code are made applicable to such facilities in rules 3745-56-28 and 3745-56-58 of the Administrative Code;
(3) Tank systems that are required under rule 3745-55-97 of the Administrative Code to meet the requirements for landfills; and
(4) Containment buildings that are required under rule 3745-205-102 of the Administrative Code to meet the requirements for landfills.
(C) The director may replace all or part of the requirements of rules 3745-55-10 to 3745-55-20 of the Administrative Code [and the unit-specific standards referenced in paragraph (C) of rule 3745-55-11 of the Administrative Code that apply to a regulated unit] with alternate requirements set out in a permit or in an enforceable document (as defined in rule 3745-50-45 of the Administrative Code) where the director determines that:
(1) The regulated unit is situated among waste management units (or areas of concern), a release has occurred, and both the regulated unit and one or more waste management unit(s) (or areas of concern) are likely to have contributed to the release; and
(2) It is not necessary to apply the closure requirements of rules 3745-55-10 to 3745-55-20 of the Administrative Code (and those referenced herein) because the alternative requirements will protect human health and the environment and will satisfy the closure performance standard of paragraphs (A) and (B) of rule 3745-55-11 of the Administrative Code.
e-filed on 12/09/2014 at 10:09 AM in Wayne County, Ohio IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS WAYNE COUNTY, OHIO The Board of Health of the Wayne County : Case No. 2014 CVC-H 00343 Combined General Health District : Plaintiff, : Judge: Mark K. Wiest v. : Philip R. Cehrs : MOTION FOR CONTEMPT Defendant. : Now comes Plaintiff, the Board of Health of the Wayne County Combined General Health District, by and through the undersigned Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and respectfully requests this Court for …
COPY. con ZALESN! COURT OF COMMON PLEAS . CIVIL DIVISION ous DEC“ PHI 32 SUMMIT COUNTY siat STATE OF OHIO MARY SLIWINSKL, et al No. 2006 02 0884 : JUDGE COSGROVE vs. PLAINTIFE’S SECOND AMENDED REPLY TO DEFENDANT MOTION TO CAPITAL PROPERTIES DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MANAGEMENT LTD., et al. AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs re-amend their Reply in a single aspect because of the recently discovered ruling of the Ohio EPA that Defendants are a Public Water System that must comply with the law and reg…
Feb 08, 2006
Summit County, OH
Dec 04, 2006
BREACH OF AGREEMENT
PATRICIA A COSGROVE
R. KYLE WITT FAIRFIELD COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 239 W. Main Street Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 (740) 652-7560 (614) 322-5265 F: (740) 653-4708 ORIGINAL Amy Brown-Thompson (0070511) Steven Darnell (0098940) Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys Fairfield Cotinty Prosecutor's Office 239 West Main Street, Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 Phone 740-652-7560 | Fax 740-653-4708 Amy.Brown-Thompson@fairfieldcountyohio.gov Attorney for the Fairfield County Board of Health IN COMPUTER 1023 HAR 3…
Fairfield County, OH
Mar 30, 2023
(CV) CIVIL
| (a ttinvnnenn FLED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 2006 NOY -B PH 2:50 BAR EDEEY CLERK GF COURTS - MONTGOMERY £0., OHIO poe IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO BLANE SCARBERRY, et al. : CASE NO. 05-8403 “ (Judge Mary Katherine Huffman) Plaintiffs vs. : DEFENDANT THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE, OHIO'S THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE,: DESIGNATION OF TRIAL OHIO MATERIALS Defendant Pursuant to Mont. Co. C.P.R. 2.01(V)(D)(2)(d) and this Court’s Order, Defendant The Village of Farmersville,…
Montgomery County, OH
Nov 08, 2006
OTHER TORT
SKELTON, McQUISTON, GOUNARIS & HENRY ATTORNEYS AT LAW First National Plaza 130 W. Second Strect Suite 1818 Dayton, Ohio 45402 (937) 226-1212 Fax (937) 226-1224 IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE : Case No. 07-CV-3366 COMPANY (J. Kessler) Plaintiff -Vvs- : DEFENDANT FINDLAY HOTELS. INC.’S CROSS-CLAIM AGAINST DRURY HOTELS CORP, et al. : DEFENDANT DRURY HOTELS CORP. Defendants Now comes Defendant, Findlay Hotels, Inc. (herein…
Montgomery County, OH
Jun 13, 2007
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.