Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 3745-50-45 | Special inclusions and exclusions for hazardous waste permits.

                                                

(A) Scope of hazardous waste permit
requirements. Chapter 3734. of the Revised Code requires a permit for the
"treatment," "storage," or "disposal" of any
hazardous waste as identified or listed in Chapter 3745-51 of the
Administrative Code. The terms "treatment," "storage,"
"disposal," and "hazardous waste" are defined in rule
3745-50-10 of the Administrative Code. Owners and operators of hazardous waste
management units shall have permits during the active life (including the
closure period) of the unit. Owners or operators of surface impoundments,
landfills, land treatment units, and waste pile units that received wastes
after July 26, 1982, or that certified closure (according to rule 3745-66-15 of
the Administrative Code) after January 26, 1983, shall have post-closure
permits, unless the owner or operator demonstrates closure by removal or
decontamination as provided under paragraphs (E) and (F) of this rule or obtain
an enforceable document in lieu of a post-closure permit, as provided under
paragraph (G) of this rule. If a post-closure permit is required, the permit
shall address applicable ground water monitoring, unsaturated zone monitoring,
corrective action, and post-closure care requirements under Chapters 3745-54 to
3745-57 and 3745-205 of the Administrative Code. The denial of a permit for the
active life of a hazardous waste management facility or unit does not affect
the requirement to obtain a post-closure permit under this rule.

(B) Specific inclusions. Owners and
operators of certain facilities require hazardous waste permits as well as
permits under other environmental programs for certain aspects of the
facility's operation. Hazardous waste permits are required for the
treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous waste at facilities requiring an
Ohio national pollutant discharge elimination system permit or an Ohio
underground injection control permit. The owner and operator of a publicly
owned treatment work (POTW) receiving hazardous waste will be deemed to have a
hazardous waste permit for that waste if the POTW is in compliance with rule
3745-50-46 of the Administrative Code.

(C) Specific exclusions and exemptions.
The following persons are among those who are not required to obtain a
hazardous waste permit:

(1) Generators who
accumulate or conduct treatment of hazardous waste that is generated on-site in
compliance with all of the conditions for exemption in rules 3745-52-14,
3745-52-15, 3745-52-16, and 3745-52-17 of the Administrative Code.

(2) Farmers who dispose
of hazardous waste pesticides from the farmers' own use as provided for in
rule 3745-52-70 of the Administrative Code.

(3) Persons who own or
operate facilities solely for the treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous
waste excluded from regulation under rule 3745-51-04 or 3745-52-14 of the
Administrative Code.

(4) Owners or operators
of "totally enclosed treatment facilities" as defined in rule
3745-50-10 of the Administrative Code.

(5) Owners and operators
of "elementary neutralization units" or "wastewater treatment
units" as defined in rule 3745-50-10 of the Administrative
Code.

(6) Transporters storing
manifested shipments of hazardous waste in containers meeting the requirements
of rule 3745-52-30 of the Administrative Code at a transfer facility for a
period of ten days or less.

(7) Persons adding
sorbent material to waste in a "container" as defined in rule
3745-50-10 of the Administrative Code, and persons adding waste to sorbent
material in a container, provided that these actions occur at the time waste is
first placed in the container, and paragraph (B) of rule 3745-54-17 and rules
3745-55-71 and 3745-55-72 of the Administrative Code are complied
with.

(8) "Universal waste
handlers" and "universal waste transporters" as defined in rule
3745-50-10 of the Administrative Code managing the wastes listed in paragraphs
(C)(8)(a) to (C)(8)(c) of this rule. These handlers are subject to regulation
under Chapter 3745-273 of the Administrative Code when managing the following
universal wastes:

(a) Batteries as described in rule 3745-273-02 of the
Administrative Code.

(b) Pesticides as described in rule 3745-273-03 of the
Administrative Code.

(c) Mercury-containing equipment as described in rule 3745-273-04
of the Administrative Code.

(d) Lamps as described in rule 3745-273-05 of the Administrative
Code.

(e) Ohio-specific universal waste, which include the
following:

(i) Aerosol containers as
described in paragraph (A) of rule 3745-273-89 of the Administrative
Code.

(ii) Antifreeze as
described in paragraph (B) of rule 3745-273-89 of the Administrative
Code.

(iii) Paint and
paint-related wastes as described in paragraph (C) of rule 3745-273-89 of the
Administrative Code.

(9) Reverse distributors
accumulating "potentially creditable hazardous waste pharmaceuticals"
and "evaluated hazardous waste pharmaceuticals" as defined in rule
3745-266-500 of the Administrative Code. Reverse distributors are subject to
regulation under rules 3745-266-500 to 3745-266-510 of the Administrative Code
for the accumulation of potentially creditable hazardous waste pharmaceuticals
and evaluated hazardous waste pharmaceuticals.

(D) Further exclusions.

(1) A person is not
required to obtain a hazardous waste permit for treatment or containment
activities taken during immediate response to any of the following
situations:

(a) A discharge of a hazardous waste.

(b) An imminent and substantial threat of a discharge of
hazardous waste.

(c) A discharge of a material which, when discharged, becomes a
hazardous waste.

(d) An immediate threat to human health, public safety, property,
or the environment from the known or suspected presence of military munitions,
other explosive material, or an explosive device, as determined by an
"explosive or munitions emergency response specialist" as defined in
rule 3745-50-10 of the Administrative Code.

(2) Any person who
continues or initiates hazardous waste treatment or containment activities
after the immediate response is over is subject to all applicable requirements
of rules 3745-50-40 to 3745-50-235 of the Administrative Code for those
activities.

(3) In the case of
emergency responses involving military munitions, the responding explosives or
munitions emergency response specialist's organizational unit shall retain
records for three years identifying the dates of the response, the names of the
responsible persons responding, the type and description of material addressed,
and the disposition of such material.

(E) Closure by removal. Owners or
operators of surface impoundments, land treatment units, and waste piles
closing by removal or decontamination under Chapters 3745-65 to 3745-69 and
3745-256 of the Administrative Code shall obtain a post-closure permit unless
the owner or operator demonstrates to the director that the closure met the
standards for closure by removal or decontamination in rule 3745-56-28,
paragraph (E) of rule 3745-56-80, or rule 3745-56-58 of the Administrative
Code. The demonstration may be made in the following ways:

(1) If the owner or
operator has submitted a "Part B" application for a post-closure
permit, the owner or operator may request a determination, based on information
in the application, that the closure by removal standards in Chapters 3745-54
to 3745-57 and 3745-205 of the Administrative Code were met and that no
post-closure permit is required.

(2) If the owner or
operator has not submitted a "Part B" application for a post-closure
permit, the owner or operator may petition the director for a determination
that a post-closure permit is not required because the closure met the
applicable closure standards in Chapters 3745-54 to 3745-57 and 3745-205 of the
Administrative Code. The petition shall include data demonstrating that closure
by removal or decontamination standards were met, or the petition shall
demonstrate that the unit closed under state requirements that met or exceeded
the applicable closure by removal standards in Chapters 3745-54 to 3745-57 and
3745-205 of the Administrative Code.

(3) The director will
approve or deny the request or petition in accordance with paragraph (F) of
this rule.

(F) Procedures for closure equivalency
determination.

(1) If a facility owner
or operator submits an equivalency demonstration under paragraph (E) of this
rule, the director will provide the public, through a newspaper notice, the
opportunity to submit written comments, within thirty days after the date of
the notice, on the information submitted by the owner or operator. The director
will also, in response to a request or at the director's own discretion,
hold a public hearing when such a hearing might clarify one or more issues
concerning the equivalency demonstration. The director will give public notice
of the hearing at least thirty days before the hearing occurs. Public notice of
the hearing may be given at the same time as notice of the opportunity for the
public to submit written comments, and the two notices may be
combined.

(2) The director will
make a determination, within ninety days after the close of the public comment
period specified in paragraph (F)(1) of this rule, as to whether the closure
under Chapters 3745-65 to 3745-69 and 3745-256 of the Administrative Code met
the requirements for closure by removal or decontamination under Chapters
3745-54 to 3745-57 and 3745-205 of the Administrative Code. If the director
finds that the closure did not meet the applicable standards under Chapters
3745-54 to 3745-57 and 3745-205 of the Administrative Code, the director will
provide the owner or operator with a written statement of the reasons why the
closure failed to meet the standards under Chapters 3745-54 to 3745-57 and
3745-205 of the Administrative Code.

(3) Within thirty days
after receipt of the director's determination pursuant to paragraph (F)(2)
of this rule, the owner or operator may submit additional information in
support of the equivalency demonstration.

(4) If additional
information is submitted by the owner or operator pursuant to paragraph (F)(3)
of this rule, the director will review the additional information submitted
and, within sixty days after receipt of the additional information, will make a
final determination as to whether the closure under Chapters 3745-65 to 3745-69
and 3745-256 of the Administrative Code met the requirements for closure by
removal or decontamination under Chapters 3745-54 to 3745-57 and 3745-205 of
the Administrative Code.

(5) If the director
determines that the facility did not close in accordance with the closure by
removal standards in Chapters 3745-54 to 3745-57 and 3745-205 of the
Administrative Code, the facility is subject to post-closure permitting
requirements.

(G) Enforceable documents for
post-closure care. At the discretion of the director, an owner or operator may
obtain, in lieu of a post-closure permit, an enforceable document imposing the
requirements of rule 3745-66-21 of the Administrative Code. "Enforceable
document" means an order, a plan, or other document issued by Ohio EPA
including, but not limited to, a corrective action order issued by Ohio EPA
under sections 3734.13, 3734.20, and 6111.03 of the Revised Code, or a closure
or post-closure plan.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 8 pages

e-filed on 12/09/2014 at 10:09 AM in Wayne County, Ohio IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS WAYNE COUNTY, OHIO The Board of Health of the Wayne County : Case No. 2014 CVC-H 00343 Combined General Health District : Plaintiff, : Judge: Mark K. Wiest v. : Philip R. Cehrs : MOTION FOR CONTEMPT Defendant. : Now comes Plaintiff, the Board of Health of the Wayne County Combined General Health District, by and through the undersigned Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and respectfully requests this Court for …

County

Wayne County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 09, 2014

Category

OTHER CIVIL

Judge Hon. WIEST, MARK K Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for WIEST, MARK K
preview-icon 6 pages

COPY. con ZALESN! COURT OF COMMON PLEAS . CIVIL DIVISION ous DEC“ PHI 32 SUMMIT COUNTY siat STATE OF OHIO MARY SLIWINSKL, et al No. 2006 02 0884 : JUDGE COSGROVE vs. PLAINTIFE’S SECOND AMENDED REPLY TO DEFENDANT MOTION TO CAPITAL PROPERTIES DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MANAGEMENT LTD., et al. AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs re-amend their Reply in a single aspect because of the recently discovered ruling of the Ohio EPA that Defendants are a Public Water System that must comply with the law and reg…

County

Summit County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 04, 2006

Category

BREACH OF AGREEMENT

Judge

PATRICIA A COSGROVE

preview-icon 8 pages

R. KYLE WITT FAIRFIELD COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 239 W. Main Street Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 (740) 652-7560 (614) 322-5265 F: (740) 653-4708 ORIGINAL Amy Brown-Thompson (0070511) Steven Darnell (0098940) Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys Fairfield Cotinty Prosecutor's Office 239 West Main Street, Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 Phone 740-652-7560 | Fax 740-653-4708 Amy.Brown-Thompson@fairfieldcountyohio.gov Attorney for the Fairfield County Board of Health IN COMPUTER 1023 HAR 3…

Case Filed

Mar 30, 2023

Case Status

Closed

County

Fairfield County, OH

Filed Date

Mar 30, 2023

Category

(CV) CIVIL

Judge Hon. BERENS, RICHARD E Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for BERENS, RICHARD E
preview-icon 3 pages

| (a ttinvnnenn FLED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 2006 NOY -B PH 2:50 BAR EDEEY CLERK GF COURTS - MONTGOMERY £0., OHIO poe IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO BLANE SCARBERRY, et al. : CASE NO. 05-8403 “ (Judge Mary Katherine Huffman) Plaintiffs vs. : DEFENDANT THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE, OHIO'S THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE,: DESIGNATION OF TRIAL OHIO MATERIALS Defendant Pursuant to Mont. Co. C.P.R. 2.01(V)(D)(2)(d) and this Court’s Order, Defendant The Village of Farmersville,…

Case Filed

Nov 02, 2005

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Nov 08, 2006

Category

OTHER TORT

preview-icon 3 pages

SED wwrne COURT OF COMMON PLEA: ay 25 PH I: 52 BUTLER COUNTY, OHIO 2006 M CITY OF HA HAMILTON, QHIO : Case No.: CV2006-02-0394 Sen Pla : Judge Pater GREGORY PARSLEY, ET AL Defendants (925 Greenwood Ave) Plaintiff now comes before the Court asking that they be permitted to enter on 925 Greenwood Ave, Hamilton, Butler County, Ohio, (legal description attached as Exhibit A) in order to obtain bids for demolition of the subject Property. Plaintiff was granted Default Judgment for this …

Case Filed

Feb 03, 2006

County

Butler County, OH

Filed Date

May 25, 2006

Judge

Pater, Honorable Charles L.

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope