Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 3745-50-24 | Standards and criteria for variances from classification as a waste.

                                                

(A) The director may grant requests for a variance from classifying as a waste those materials that are accumulated speculatively without sufficient amounts being recycled if the applicant demonstrates that sufficient amounts of the material will be recycled or transferred for recycling in the following year. If a variance is granted, it is valid only for the following year, but can be renewed, on an annual basis, by filing a new application. The director's decision will be based on the following criteria:

(1) The manner in which the material is expected to be recycled, when the material is expected to be recycled, and whether this expected disposition is likely to occur (for example, because of past practice, market factors, the nature of the material, or contractual arrangements for recycling);

(2) The reason that the applicant has accumulated the material for one or more years without recycling seventy-five per cent of the volume accumulated at the beginning of the year;

(3) The quantity of material already accumulated and the quantity expected to be generated and accumulated before the material is recycled;

(4) The extent to which the material is handled to minimize loss; and

(5) Other relevant factors.

(B) The director may grant requests for a variance from classifying as a waste those materials that are reclaimed and then reused as feedstock within the original production process in which the materials were generated, if the reclamation operation is an essential part of the production process. This determination will be based on the following criteria:

(1) How economically viable the production process would be if it were to use virgin materials, rather than reclaimed materials;

(2) The extent to which the material is handled before reclamation to minimize loss;

(3) The time periods between generating the material and its reclamation, and between reclamation and return to the original primary production process;

(4) The location of the reclamation operation in relation to the production process;

(5) Whether the reclaimed material is used for the purpose for which it was originally produced when it is returned to the original process, and whether it is returned to the process in substantially its original form;

(6) Whether the person who generates the material also reclaims it; and

(7) Other relevant factors.

(C) The director may grant requests for a variance from classifying as a waste those materials that have been reclaimed but must be reclaimed further before recovery is completed if, after initial reclamation, the resulting material is commodity-like (even though it is not yet a commercial product, and has to be reclaimed further). This determination will be based on the following factors:

(1) The degree of processing the material has undergone and the degree of further processing that is required;

(2) The value of the material after it has been reclaimed;

(3) The degree to which the reclaimed material is like an analogous raw material;

(4) The extent to which an end market of the reclaimed material is guaranteed;

(5) The extent to which the reclaimed material is handled to minimize loss; and

(6) Other relevant factors.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 8 pages

e-filed on 12/09/2014 at 10:09 AM in Wayne County, Ohio IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS WAYNE COUNTY, OHIO The Board of Health of the Wayne County : Case No. 2014 CVC-H 00343 Combined General Health District : Plaintiff, : Judge: Mark K. Wiest v. : Philip R. Cehrs : MOTION FOR CONTEMPT Defendant. : Now comes Plaintiff, the Board of Health of the Wayne County Combined General Health District, by and through the undersigned Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and respectfully requests this Court for …

County

Wayne County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 09, 2014

Category

OTHER CIVIL

Judge Hon. WIEST, MARK K Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for WIEST, MARK K
preview-icon 6 pages

COPY. con ZALESN! COURT OF COMMON PLEAS . CIVIL DIVISION ous DEC“ PHI 32 SUMMIT COUNTY siat STATE OF OHIO MARY SLIWINSKL, et al No. 2006 02 0884 : JUDGE COSGROVE vs. PLAINTIFE’S SECOND AMENDED REPLY TO DEFENDANT MOTION TO CAPITAL PROPERTIES DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MANAGEMENT LTD., et al. AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs re-amend their Reply in a single aspect because of the recently discovered ruling of the Ohio EPA that Defendants are a Public Water System that must comply with the law and reg…

County

Summit County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 04, 2006

Category

BREACH OF AGREEMENT

Judge

PATRICIA A COSGROVE

preview-icon 8 pages

R. KYLE WITT FAIRFIELD COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 239 W. Main Street Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 (740) 652-7560 (614) 322-5265 F: (740) 653-4708 ORIGINAL Amy Brown-Thompson (0070511) Steven Darnell (0098940) Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys Fairfield Cotinty Prosecutor's Office 239 West Main Street, Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 Phone 740-652-7560 | Fax 740-653-4708 Amy.Brown-Thompson@fairfieldcountyohio.gov Attorney for the Fairfield County Board of Health IN COMPUTER 1023 HAR 3…

Case Filed

Mar 30, 2023

Case Status

Closed

County

Fairfield County, OH

Filed Date

Mar 30, 2023

Category

(CV) CIVIL

Judge Hon. BERENS, RICHARD E Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for BERENS, RICHARD E
preview-icon 3 pages

| (a ttinvnnenn FLED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 2006 NOY -B PH 2:50 BAR EDEEY CLERK GF COURTS - MONTGOMERY £0., OHIO poe IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO BLANE SCARBERRY, et al. : CASE NO. 05-8403 “ (Judge Mary Katherine Huffman) Plaintiffs vs. : DEFENDANT THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE, OHIO'S THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE,: DESIGNATION OF TRIAL OHIO MATERIALS Defendant Pursuant to Mont. Co. C.P.R. 2.01(V)(D)(2)(d) and this Court’s Order, Defendant The Village of Farmersville,…

Case Filed

Nov 02, 2005

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Nov 08, 2006

Category

OTHER TORT

preview-icon 3 pages

SED wwrne COURT OF COMMON PLEA: ay 25 PH I: 52 BUTLER COUNTY, OHIO 2006 M CITY OF HA HAMILTON, QHIO : Case No.: CV2006-02-0394 Sen Pla : Judge Pater GREGORY PARSLEY, ET AL Defendants (925 Greenwood Ave) Plaintiff now comes before the Court asking that they be permitted to enter on 925 Greenwood Ave, Hamilton, Butler County, Ohio, (legal description attached as Exhibit A) in order to obtain bids for demolition of the subject Property. Plaintiff was granted Default Judgment for this …

Case Filed

Feb 03, 2006

County

Butler County, OH

Filed Date

May 25, 2006

Judge

Pater, Honorable Charles L.

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope