Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 3745-5-06 | Requirements for a water quality trading management plan application.

                                                

(A) A water quality trading management
plan application shall satisfy all of the following:

(1) Be in narrative
form.

(2) Include forms
specified by the director.

(3) Include additional
information as the director deems necessary, such as memoranda of understanding
or other agreements between persons participating in the trading activities or
between Ohio EPA and persons participating in the trading activities, land use
plans, or other watershed-based agreements.

(B) When point source trading occurs
between permittees, the water quality trading management plan application shall
meet all of the following requirements:

(1) Be submitted as part
of each permittee's NPDES permit application or by the permittees at any
time during the term of each permittee's NPDES permit. Such applications
shall be submitted as proposed modifications of the respective NPDES permits.
Applications for a water quality trading management plan by two or more point
sources shall be submitted at approximately the same time.

(2) Include a statement
of purpose.

(3) Include a map of the
entire water quality trading area that identifies and delineates all of the
following that apply:

(a) The boundaries of all receiving waters.

(b) A TMDL area.

(c) The entire watershed area where trading will
occur.

(4) Identify all
permittees participating in the trading activity at the time the water quality
trading management plan is submitted along with the names of responsible
contact persons.

(5) Include a list of
pollutants being proposed for water quality trading.

(6) Include an assessment
of all readily available information of the existing water quality, along with
a comparison to water quality standards for the receiving waters, TMDL area or
watershed where trading will occur.

(7) Provide justification
for all trading ratios, in accordance with this chapter.

(8) Identify any
pollutant-specific cap, wasteload allocations or load allocations that have
been developed.

(9) In accordance with
this chapter, provide justification for all water quality baselines for the
generation of water quality credits for all sources participating in the
trading activity, as well as the procedures used to determine the
baselines.

(10) Describe the water
quality trading activities.

(11) Include a schedule
for implementing the trading activity.

(12) In accordance with
rule 3745-5-13 of the Administrative Code, describe the process for public
participation throughout the development, implementation and revision of the
trading activities.

(13) Include corrective measures, should
any negotiated water quality credit not be produced.

(C) In addition to meeting all
requirements in paragraphs (A) and (B)(1) to (B)(13) of this rule, when point
source-nonpoint source trading occurs between one permittee and one or more
nonpoint sources, the water quality trading management plan application shall
also include all of the following:

(1) Identify other
persons, organizations, agencies and qualified soil and water conservation
professionals responsible for implementing the proposal.

(2) Describe current and
projected land use activities within the area where trading will
occur.

(3) Include a map which
identifies all hydrologic assessment units where nonpoint sources that might
participate in the water quality trading activities are located. The hydrologic
assessment units shall be identified using either the ten digit or twelve digit
hydrologic unit code as appropriate for the size of the water quality trading
area.

(4) Include a list that
illustrates the range of BMPs anticipated to be used in the trading activity,
including the frequency for all of the following:

(a) Conducting field inspections and verifications of any
BMP.

(b) Assessing the pollutant removal rates and the load reductions
for each BMP.

(c) If required by the director, collecting water quality
monitoring data for evaluating BMP effectiveness.

(D) In addition to meeting all the
requirements in paragraphs (A), (B)(2) to (B)(13), and (C)(1) to (C)(4) of this
rule, an application for watershed trading shall include the
following:

(1) All water quality
baselines, developed in accordance with this chapter, for the generation of
water quality credits for all sources anticipated to participate in the plan,
as well as the procedures used to determine the baselines.

(2) A map which
identifies all hydrologic assessment units where nonpoint sources that might
participate in the water quality trading activities are located. The hydrologic
assessment units shall be identified using either the ten digit or twelve digit
hydrologic unit code as appropriate for the size of the water quality trading
area.

[Comment: Watershed trading means water quality
trading activities within an area that occur between two or more permittees and
one or more nonpoint sources.]

(E) The director may require a schedule
for conducting ambient water quality monitoring to determine if there have been
negative impacts to water quality and to document the presence or absence of
improvements in water quality. If required, ambient water quality monitoring
shall be conducted in accordance with rule 3745-5-14 of the Administrative
Code.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 8 pages

e-filed on 12/09/2014 at 10:09 AM in Wayne County, Ohio IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS WAYNE COUNTY, OHIO The Board of Health of the Wayne County : Case No. 2014 CVC-H 00343 Combined General Health District : Plaintiff, : Judge: Mark K. Wiest v. : Philip R. Cehrs : MOTION FOR CONTEMPT Defendant. : Now comes Plaintiff, the Board of Health of the Wayne County Combined General Health District, by and through the undersigned Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and respectfully requests this Court for …

County

Wayne County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 09, 2014

Category

OTHER CIVIL

Judge Hon. WIEST, MARK K Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for WIEST, MARK K
preview-icon 8 pages

R. KYLE WITT FAIRFIELD COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 239 W. Main Street Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 (740) 652-7560 (614) 322-5265 F: (740) 653-4708 ORIGINAL Amy Brown-Thompson (0070511) Steven Darnell (0098940) Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys Fairfield Cotinty Prosecutor's Office 239 West Main Street, Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 Phone 740-652-7560 | Fax 740-653-4708 Amy.Brown-Thompson@fairfieldcountyohio.gov Attorney for the Fairfield County Board of Health IN COMPUTER 1023 HAR 3…

Case Filed

Mar 30, 2023

Case Status

Closed

County

Fairfield County, OH

Filed Date

Mar 30, 2023

Category

(CV) CIVIL

Judge Hon. BERENS, RICHARD E Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for BERENS, RICHARD E
preview-icon 3 pages

| (a ttinvnnenn FLED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 2006 NOY -B PH 2:50 BAR EDEEY CLERK GF COURTS - MONTGOMERY £0., OHIO poe IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO BLANE SCARBERRY, et al. : CASE NO. 05-8403 “ (Judge Mary Katherine Huffman) Plaintiffs vs. : DEFENDANT THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE, OHIO'S THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE,: DESIGNATION OF TRIAL OHIO MATERIALS Defendant Pursuant to Mont. Co. C.P.R. 2.01(V)(D)(2)(d) and this Court’s Order, Defendant The Village of Farmersville,…

Case Filed

Nov 02, 2005

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Nov 08, 2006

Category

OTHER TORT

preview-icon 6 pages

COPY. con ZALESN! COURT OF COMMON PLEAS . CIVIL DIVISION ous DEC“ PHI 32 SUMMIT COUNTY siat STATE OF OHIO MARY SLIWINSKL, et al No. 2006 02 0884 : JUDGE COSGROVE vs. PLAINTIFE’S SECOND AMENDED REPLY TO DEFENDANT MOTION TO CAPITAL PROPERTIES DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MANAGEMENT LTD., et al. AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs re-amend their Reply in a single aspect because of the recently discovered ruling of the Ohio EPA that Defendants are a Public Water System that must comply with the law and reg…

County

Summit County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 04, 2006

Category

BREACH OF AGREEMENT

Judge

PATRICIA A COSGROVE

preview-icon 6 pages

SKELTON, McQUISTON, GOUNARIS & HENRY ATTORNEYS AT LAW First National Plaza 130 W. Second Street Suite 1818 Dayton, Ohio 45402 (937) 226-1212 Fax (937) 226-1224 MOT PLEAS OF U3 Pit 3: 30 IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE : Case No. 07-CV-3366 COMPANY (J. Kessler) Plaintiff DEFENDANT FINDLAY HOTELS, -vs- : INC.’S COUNTERCLAIM DRURY HOTELS CORP, et al. Defendants Now comes Defendant, Findlay Hotels, Inc. (hereinafter “Findlay”), throu…

Case Filed

Apr 23, 2007

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Jun 13, 2007

Category

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope