Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 3745-33-03 | Applications.

                                                

[Comment: For dates of non-regulatory government
publications, publications of recognized organizations and associations,
federal rules and federal statutory provisions referenced in this rule, see
rule 3745-33-01 of the Administrative Code.]

(A) Applications for Ohio NPDES permits
shall be filed only on forms approved by Ohio EPA and shall contain such
information as Ohio EPA deems necessary. These forms may be electronic. As a
minimum, these applications shall contain any NPDES application information
required by regulations adopted by the administrator, including 40 C.F.R. 122
to 125, 129 to 133, 136, 400 to 471, 501 and 503.

(B) Any person proposing to commence the
discharge of pollutants shall submit an application, including all data
required by the application form, at least one hundred eighty days prior to
commencement of the discharge. If a permit renewal application is submitted at
least one hundred eighty days prior to the expiration date of the existing
permit, and the director does not issue a new permit before the expiration
date, the conditions of the expired permit shall continue in force until the
director acts on the permit application.

(C) Application requirements for
materials added to wastewater.

(1) The applicant shall
attach to the application a list of treatment additives proposed to be
discharged including, but not limited to, maintenance chemicals and chemicals
used to aid in the treatment of the wastewater.

(2) If these treatment
additives proposed have not been approved in a permit to install issued under
Chapter 3745-42 of the Administrative Code, director's final findings and
orders, or NPDES permit issuance, the applicant shall also submit an
application to discharge the treatment additives in accordance with paragraph
(G) of this rule..

(D) Any application that fails to provide Ohio EPA with requested
information needed for ascertaining compliance with the applicable provisions
of this chapter, may be considered incomplete. Ohio EPA may either request
additional information or return the application to the applicant without
further processing. An indication of why the application was considered
incomplete shall accompany the application returned.

(1) Except as specified
in paragraph (D)(1)(b) of this rule, a permit application shall not be
considered complete unless all required quantitative data are collected in
accordance with sufficiently sensitive analytical methods approved under 40
C.F.R. Part 136 or required under 40 C.F.R. chapter I, subchapter N or
O.

(a) For the purposes of this requirement, a method approved
under 40 C.F.R. Part 136 or required under 40 C.F.R. chapter I, subchapter N or
O is "sufficiently sensitive" when any of the following conditions
are met:

(i) The method
quantification level (QL) is at or below the level of the applicable water
quality criterion for the measured pollutant or pollutant
parameter.

(ii) The method QL is
above the applicable water quality criterion, but the amount of the pollutant
or pollutant parameter in a facilitys discharge is high enough that the
method detects and quantifies the level of the pollutant or pollutant parameter
in the discharge.

(iii) The method has the
lowest QL of the analytical methods approved under 40 C.F.R. Part 136 or
required under 40 C.F.R. chapter I, subchapter N or O for the measured
pollutant or pollutant parameter.

(b) When there is no analytical method that has been
approved under 40 C.F.R. Part 136, required under 40 C.F.R. chapter I,
subchapter N or O, and a specific analytical method is not otherwise required
by the director, the applicant may use any suitable method but shall provide a
description of the method. When selecting a suitable method, other factors such
as a methods precision, accuracy or resolution may be considered when
assessing the performance of the method.

[Comment: Common deficiencies include not
submitting the application fee, the listed operator on form 1.VIII should be
the responsible party as opposed to the person who does the day-to-day
operations and maintenance, the signatory not meeting the requirements in
paragraph (F) of this rule, form 2C not including analytical data of pollutants
believed present, form 2S not completed for small sanitary applicants using
form 2E and the submitted sample analysis not having a sufficiently sensitive
analytical method to determine compliance with applicable water quality
standards.]

(E) An applicant may request that
information submitted with applications be treated as confidential business
information.

(1) A request for
confidential treatment shall be submitted to Ohio EPA simultaneously with an
application with documentation sufficient to support that the information is
confidential. Failure to make such a timely request shall constitute a waiver
of the right to prevent public disclosure. A request at a later time will be
entertained by Ohio EPA, but Ohio EPA will not be liable for any information
released prior to receiving the request.

(2) A decision as to
whether to treat the information as confidential shall be made by the director
within forty-five days of receipt of the request and accompanying
documentation. Until such decision is made, the information or part thereof,
shall be treated as confidential. The applicant requesting confidentiality
shall be notified in writing of the director's decision.

(3) Any information
determined to be confidential may be disclosed, as follows:

(a) To officers, employees or authorized representatives of
the state or a federal agency, without the consent of the affected person, when
necessary to sustain an action brought pursuant to Chapter 6111. of the Revised
Code or during an adjudication hearing or when otherwise necessary to fulfill
any requirement of the act or Chapter 6111. of the Revised Code.

(b) In any judicial proceeding in accordance with paragraph
(E)(3)(d) of this rule.

(c) In any administrative hearing in accordance with
paragraph (E)(3)(d) of this rule.

(d) Information determined to be confidential may be
disclosed in any judicial proceeding or in any administrative hearing after
notification to the affected person and the presiding officer sufficient to
allow submission of comments by the affected person prior to disclosure of the
information. Upon consideration of such comments, the presiding officer may
condition disclosure of the information on the making of such protective
arrangements and commitments found to be necessary and
appropriate.

(e) Disclosure of information determined to be confidential
in accordance with paragraph (E)(3) of this rule shall not, of itself, affect
the eligibility of information for confidential treatment under the other
provisions of this rule.

(4) Information required
by NPDES application forms provided by the director under this rule may not be
claimed confidential. This includes information on the forms themselves and any
attachments used to supply information required by the forms. Claims for
confidentiality will be denied for the following information:

(a) The name and address of any permit applicant or
permittee.

(b) Permit applications, permits, and effluent
data.

(F) An application submitted to the director pursuant to
this chapter shall be signed as follows:

(1) In the case of a
corporation, by a responsible corporate officer. For these purposes, a
responsible corporate officer means either of the following:

(a) A president, secretary, treasurer or vice-president of the
corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who
performs similar policy-making or decision-making functions for the
corporation.

(b) The manager of one or more manufacturing, production or
operating facilities, provided the manager is authorized to make management
decisions that govern the operation of the regulated facility including having
explicit or implicit duty of making major capital investment recommendations,
and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long-term
environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations; the manager
can ensure that the necessary systems are established or actions taken to
gather complete and accurate information for permit application requirements;
and where authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the
manager in accordance with corporate procedures.

(2) In the case of a
partnership, by a general partner.

(3) In the case of a sole
proprietorship, by the proprietor.

(4) In the case of a
municipal, state or other public facility, by either the principal executive
officer, the ranking elected official or other duly authorized
employee.

(G) Requesting approval to use and
discharge treatment additives.

(1) Permittees, except
for POTWs, shall obtain prior approval for the use of new treatment additives
and for the discharge of treatment additives.

(2) Requests for
approvals under this paragraph shall be filed only on forms approved by Ohio
EPA and contain such information as Ohio EPA deems necessary. The forms may be
submitted electronically.

[Comment: Ohio EPA recommends that facilities
submit requests at least forty-five days prior to when the facility plans to
discharge wastewater containing the requested additive.]

(3) All of the following
substances are exempt from the requirement to request approval prior to
use:

(a) Acids and bases used only to alter the pH of the
discharge when the applicable outfall already includes an effluent limit for
pH, including all of the following:

(i) Caustic soda (sodium hydroxide).

(ii) Magnesium hydroxide.

(iii) Ferric chloride.

(iv) Aluminum sulfate (alum).

(v) Lime.

(vi) Sulfuric acid.

(b) Sodium carbonate.

(c) Polyaluminum chloride.

(d) The following chlorination chemicals when the
applicable outfall already includes an effluent limit for
chlorine:

(i) Chlorine.

(ii) Sodium
hypochlorite.

(iii) Calcium
hypochlorite.

(e) The following dechlorination chemicals:

(i) Sodium
thiosulfate.

(ii) Sodium
sulfite.

(iii) Sodium meta
bisulfite.

(iv) Sodium
bisulfite.

(v) Sulfur
dioxide.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 8 pages

e-filed on 12/09/2014 at 10:09 AM in Wayne County, Ohio IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS WAYNE COUNTY, OHIO The Board of Health of the Wayne County : Case No. 2014 CVC-H 00343 Combined General Health District : Plaintiff, : Judge: Mark K. Wiest v. : Philip R. Cehrs : MOTION FOR CONTEMPT Defendant. : Now comes Plaintiff, the Board of Health of the Wayne County Combined General Health District, by and through the undersigned Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and respectfully requests this Court for …

County

Wayne County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 09, 2014

Category

OTHER CIVIL

Judge Hon. WIEST, MARK K Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for WIEST, MARK K
preview-icon 6 pages

COPY. con ZALESN! COURT OF COMMON PLEAS . CIVIL DIVISION ous DEC“ PHI 32 SUMMIT COUNTY siat STATE OF OHIO MARY SLIWINSKL, et al No. 2006 02 0884 : JUDGE COSGROVE vs. PLAINTIFE’S SECOND AMENDED REPLY TO DEFENDANT MOTION TO CAPITAL PROPERTIES DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MANAGEMENT LTD., et al. AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs re-amend their Reply in a single aspect because of the recently discovered ruling of the Ohio EPA that Defendants are a Public Water System that must comply with the law and reg…

County

Summit County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 04, 2006

Category

BREACH OF AGREEMENT

Judge

PATRICIA A COSGROVE

preview-icon 8 pages

R. KYLE WITT FAIRFIELD COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 239 W. Main Street Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 (740) 652-7560 (614) 322-5265 F: (740) 653-4708 ORIGINAL Amy Brown-Thompson (0070511) Steven Darnell (0098940) Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys Fairfield Cotinty Prosecutor's Office 239 West Main Street, Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 Phone 740-652-7560 | Fax 740-653-4708 Amy.Brown-Thompson@fairfieldcountyohio.gov Attorney for the Fairfield County Board of Health IN COMPUTER 1023 HAR 3…

Case Filed

Mar 30, 2023

Case Status

Closed

County

Fairfield County, OH

Filed Date

Mar 30, 2023

Category

(CV) CIVIL

Judge Hon. BERENS, RICHARD E Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for BERENS, RICHARD E
preview-icon 3 pages

| (a ttinvnnenn FLED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 2006 NOY -B PH 2:50 BAR EDEEY CLERK GF COURTS - MONTGOMERY £0., OHIO poe IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO BLANE SCARBERRY, et al. : CASE NO. 05-8403 “ (Judge Mary Katherine Huffman) Plaintiffs vs. : DEFENDANT THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE, OHIO'S THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE,: DESIGNATION OF TRIAL OHIO MATERIALS Defendant Pursuant to Mont. Co. C.P.R. 2.01(V)(D)(2)(d) and this Court’s Order, Defendant The Village of Farmersville,…

Case Filed

Nov 02, 2005

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Nov 08, 2006

Category

OTHER TORT

preview-icon 3 pages

SED wwrne COURT OF COMMON PLEA: ay 25 PH I: 52 BUTLER COUNTY, OHIO 2006 M CITY OF HA HAMILTON, QHIO : Case No.: CV2006-02-0394 Sen Pla : Judge Pater GREGORY PARSLEY, ET AL Defendants (925 Greenwood Ave) Plaintiff now comes before the Court asking that they be permitted to enter on 925 Greenwood Ave, Hamilton, Butler County, Ohio, (legal description attached as Exhibit A) in order to obtain bids for demolition of the subject Property. Plaintiff was granted Default Judgment for this …

Case Filed

Feb 03, 2006

County

Butler County, OH

Filed Date

May 25, 2006

Judge

Pater, Honorable Charles L.

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope