Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 3745-113-04 | Container labeling requirements.

                                                

(A) Effective January 1, 2009, each
manufacturer of any AIM coatings subject to this rule shall display the
following information on the coating container (or label) in which the coating
is sold or distributed:

(1) Date code: The date
the coating was manufactured, or a date code representing the date, shall be
indicated on the label, lid, or bottom of the container. If the manufacturer
uses a date code for any coating, the manufacturer shall file an explanation of
each code with the director.

(2) Thinning
recommendations: A statement of the manufacturer's recommendation
regarding thinning of the coating shall be indicated on the label or lid of the
container. This requirement does not apply to the thinning of architectural
coatings with water. If thinning of the coating prior to use is not necessary,
the recommendation shall specify that the coating is to be applied without
thinning.

(3) VOC content: Each
container of any coating subject to this rule shall display either the maximum
or the actual VOC content of the coating, as supplied, including the maximum
thinning as recommended by the manufacturer. VOC content shall be displayed in
grams of VOC per liter of coating. VOC content displayed shall be calculated
using product formulation data, or shall be determined using the test methods
in paragraph (A)(2) of rule 3745-113-06 of the Administrative Code. The
equations in paragraph (A)(1) of rule 3745-113-06 of the Administrative Code
shall be used to calculate VOC content.

(4) Industrial
maintenance coatings: The label or the lid of the container in which the
coating is sold or distributed shall display one or more of the following
descriptions:

(a) "For industrial use only."

(b) "For professional use only."

(c) "Not for residential use" or "Not intended for
residential use."

(5) Clear brushing
lacquers: The labels of all clear brushing lacquers shall prominently display
the statements "For brush application only," and "This product
must not be thinned or sprayed."

(6) Rust preventive
coatings: The labels of all rust preventive coatings shall prominently display
the statement "For metal substrates only."

(7) Specialty primers,
sealers, and undercoaters: The labels of all specialty primers, sealers, and
undercoaters shall prominently display one or more of the
following:

(a) For blocking stains.

(b) For fire-damaged substrates.

(c) For smoke-damaged substrates.

(d) For water-damaged substrates.

(e) For excessively chalky substrates.

(f) To seal in efflorescence.

(8) Quick dry enamels:
The labels of all quick dry enamels shall prominently display the words
"Quick Dry" and the dry hard time.

(9) Non-flat high-gloss
coatings: The labels of all non-flat -high-gloss coatings shall prominently
display the words "High Gloss."

(10) Faux finishing
coatings: The labels of all clear topcoat faux finishing coatings shall
prominently display the statement "This product can only be sold or used
as part of a faux finishing coating system."

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 8 pages

e-filed on 12/09/2014 at 10:09 AM in Wayne County, Ohio IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS WAYNE COUNTY, OHIO The Board of Health of the Wayne County : Case No. 2014 CVC-H 00343 Combined General Health District : Plaintiff, : Judge: Mark K. Wiest v. : Philip R. Cehrs : MOTION FOR CONTEMPT Defendant. : Now comes Plaintiff, the Board of Health of the Wayne County Combined General Health District, by and through the undersigned Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and respectfully requests this Court for …

County

Wayne County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 09, 2014

Category

OTHER CIVIL

Judge Hon. WIEST, MARK K Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for WIEST, MARK K
preview-icon 6 pages

COPY. con ZALESN! COURT OF COMMON PLEAS . CIVIL DIVISION ous DEC“ PHI 32 SUMMIT COUNTY siat STATE OF OHIO MARY SLIWINSKL, et al No. 2006 02 0884 : JUDGE COSGROVE vs. PLAINTIFE’S SECOND AMENDED REPLY TO DEFENDANT MOTION TO CAPITAL PROPERTIES DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MANAGEMENT LTD., et al. AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs re-amend their Reply in a single aspect because of the recently discovered ruling of the Ohio EPA that Defendants are a Public Water System that must comply with the law and reg…

County

Summit County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 04, 2006

Category

BREACH OF AGREEMENT

Judge

PATRICIA A COSGROVE

preview-icon 8 pages

R. KYLE WITT FAIRFIELD COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 239 W. Main Street Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 (740) 652-7560 (614) 322-5265 F: (740) 653-4708 ORIGINAL Amy Brown-Thompson (0070511) Steven Darnell (0098940) Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys Fairfield Cotinty Prosecutor's Office 239 West Main Street, Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 Phone 740-652-7560 | Fax 740-653-4708 Amy.Brown-Thompson@fairfieldcountyohio.gov Attorney for the Fairfield County Board of Health IN COMPUTER 1023 HAR 3…

Case Filed

Mar 30, 2023

Case Status

Closed

County

Fairfield County, OH

Filed Date

Mar 30, 2023

Category

(CV) CIVIL

Judge Hon. BERENS, RICHARD E Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for BERENS, RICHARD E
preview-icon 3 pages

| (a ttinvnnenn FLED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 2006 NOY -B PH 2:50 BAR EDEEY CLERK GF COURTS - MONTGOMERY £0., OHIO poe IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO BLANE SCARBERRY, et al. : CASE NO. 05-8403 “ (Judge Mary Katherine Huffman) Plaintiffs vs. : DEFENDANT THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE, OHIO'S THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE,: DESIGNATION OF TRIAL OHIO MATERIALS Defendant Pursuant to Mont. Co. C.P.R. 2.01(V)(D)(2)(d) and this Court’s Order, Defendant The Village of Farmersville,…

Case Filed

Nov 02, 2005

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Nov 08, 2006

Category

OTHER TORT

preview-icon 3 pages

SED wwrne COURT OF COMMON PLEA: ay 25 PH I: 52 BUTLER COUNTY, OHIO 2006 M CITY OF HA HAMILTON, QHIO : Case No.: CV2006-02-0394 Sen Pla : Judge Pater GREGORY PARSLEY, ET AL Defendants (925 Greenwood Ave) Plaintiff now comes before the Court asking that they be permitted to enter on 925 Greenwood Ave, Hamilton, Butler County, Ohio, (legal description attached as Exhibit A) in order to obtain bids for demolition of the subject Property. Plaintiff was granted Default Judgment for this …

Case Filed

Feb 03, 2006

County

Butler County, OH

Filed Date

May 25, 2006

Judge

Pater, Honorable Charles L.

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope