Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 3745-103-04 | Retired units exemption.

                                                

[Comment: For dates and availability of
non-regulatory government publications, publications of recognized
organizations and associations, federal rules, and federal statutory provisions
referenced in this rule, see paragraph (C) of rule 3745-103-01 of the
Administrative Code titled "Referenced materials."]

(A) This rule applies to any affected
unit (except for an opt-in source) that is permanently retired.

(B) Provisions.

(1) Any affected unit
(except for an opt-in source) that is permanently retired shall be exempt from
the acid rain program, except for the provisions of this rule, rules
3745-103-01 and 3745-103-02 of the Administrative Code, and 40 CFR Part 73,
Subpart B.

(2) The exemption under
paragraph (B)(1) of this rule shall become effective on January first of the
first full calendar year during which that the unit is permanently retired. By
December thirty-first of the first year that the unit is to be exempt under
this rule, the designated representative (authorized in accordance with rule
3745-103-06 of the Administrative Code), or, if no designated representative
has been authorized, a certifying official of each owner of the unit shall
submit a statement to the director. A copy of the statement shall be submitted
to USEPA. The statement shall state (in a format prescribed by the USEPA) that
the unit is permanently retired and shall comply with the requirements of
paragraph (D) of this rule.

(3) After receipt of the
notice under paragraph (B)(2) of this rule, the director shall amend under rule
3745-103-18 of the Administrative Code the operating permit covering the source
at which the unit is located, if the source has such a permit, to add the
provisions and requirements of the exemption under paragraphs (B)(1) and (D) of
this rule.

(C) A unit that was issued a written
exemption under this rule and that is permanently retired shall be exempt from
the acid rain program, except for the provisions of this rule, rules
3745-103-01 and 3745-103-02 of the Administrative Code, and subpart B of 40 CFR
Part 73, and shall be subject to the requirements of paragraph (D) of this rule
in lieu of the requirements set forth in the written exemption. The director
shall amend under rule 3745-103-18 of the Administrative Code the operating
permit covering the source at which the unit is located, if the source has such
a permit, to add the provisions and requirements of the exemption under this
paragraph and paragraph (D) of this rule.

(D) Special provisions.

(1) A unit exempted under
this rule shall not emit any sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides starting on the
date the exemption takes effect. The owners and operators of the unit shall be
allocated allowances in accordance with 40 CFR Part 73, Subpart B.

(2) A unit exempt under
this rule shall not resume operation unless the designated representative of
the source that includes the unit submits a complete acid rain permit
application under rule 3745-103-07 of the Administrative Code for the unit not
less than twenty-four months prior to the date on which the unit is to resume
operation.

(3) The owners and
operators and, to the extent applicable, the designated representative of a
unit exempt under this rule shall comply with the requirements of the acid rain
program concerning all periods for which the exemption is not in effect, even
if such requirements arise, or must be complied with, after the exemption takes
effect.

(4) For any period for
which a unit is exempt under this rule:

(a) For purposes of applying 40 CFR Parts 70 and 71, the unit
shall not be treated as an affected unit under the acid rain program and shall
continue to be subject to any other applicable requirements under 40 CFR Parts
70 and 71.

(b) The unit shall not be eligible to be an opt-in source under
rules 3745-103-22 to 3745-103-54 of the Administrative Code.

(5) For a period of five
years from the date the records are created the owners and operators of a unit
exempt under this rule shall retain at the source that includes the unit
records demonstrating that the unit is permanently retired. The five year
period for keeping records may be extended for cause, at any time prior to the
end of the period, in writing by the director. The owners and operators bear
the burden of proof that the unit is permanently retired.

(6) Loss of
exemption.

(a) On the earlier of the following dates, a unit exempt under
paragraph (B) or (C) of this rule shall lose its exemption under the acid rain
program and 40 CFR Parts 70 and 71:

(i) The date on which the
designated representative submits an acid rain permit application under
paragraph (D)(2) of this rule.

(ii) The date on which
the designated representative is required under paragraph (D)(2) of this rule
to submit an acid rain permit application.

(b) For the purpose of applying monitoring requirements under 40
CFR Part 75, a unit that loses its exemption under this rule shall be treated
as a new unit that commenced commercial operation on the first date on which
the unit resumes operation.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 8 pages

e-filed on 12/09/2014 at 10:09 AM in Wayne County, Ohio IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS WAYNE COUNTY, OHIO The Board of Health of the Wayne County : Case No. 2014 CVC-H 00343 Combined General Health District : Plaintiff, : Judge: Mark K. Wiest v. : Philip R. Cehrs : MOTION FOR CONTEMPT Defendant. : Now comes Plaintiff, the Board of Health of the Wayne County Combined General Health District, by and through the undersigned Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and respectfully requests this Court for …

County

Wayne County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 09, 2014

Category

OTHER CIVIL

Judge Hon. WIEST, MARK K Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for WIEST, MARK K
preview-icon 6 pages

COPY. con ZALESN! COURT OF COMMON PLEAS . CIVIL DIVISION ous DEC“ PHI 32 SUMMIT COUNTY siat STATE OF OHIO MARY SLIWINSKL, et al No. 2006 02 0884 : JUDGE COSGROVE vs. PLAINTIFE’S SECOND AMENDED REPLY TO DEFENDANT MOTION TO CAPITAL PROPERTIES DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MANAGEMENT LTD., et al. AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs re-amend their Reply in a single aspect because of the recently discovered ruling of the Ohio EPA that Defendants are a Public Water System that must comply with the law and reg…

County

Summit County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 04, 2006

Category

BREACH OF AGREEMENT

Judge

PATRICIA A COSGROVE

preview-icon 8 pages

R. KYLE WITT FAIRFIELD COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 239 W. Main Street Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 (740) 652-7560 (614) 322-5265 F: (740) 653-4708 ORIGINAL Amy Brown-Thompson (0070511) Steven Darnell (0098940) Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys Fairfield Cotinty Prosecutor's Office 239 West Main Street, Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 Phone 740-652-7560 | Fax 740-653-4708 Amy.Brown-Thompson@fairfieldcountyohio.gov Attorney for the Fairfield County Board of Health IN COMPUTER 1023 HAR 3…

Case Filed

Mar 30, 2023

Case Status

Closed

County

Fairfield County, OH

Filed Date

Mar 30, 2023

Category

(CV) CIVIL

Judge Hon. BERENS, RICHARD E Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for BERENS, RICHARD E
preview-icon 3 pages

| (a ttinvnnenn FLED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 2006 NOY -B PH 2:50 BAR EDEEY CLERK GF COURTS - MONTGOMERY £0., OHIO poe IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO BLANE SCARBERRY, et al. : CASE NO. 05-8403 “ (Judge Mary Katherine Huffman) Plaintiffs vs. : DEFENDANT THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE, OHIO'S THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE,: DESIGNATION OF TRIAL OHIO MATERIALS Defendant Pursuant to Mont. Co. C.P.R. 2.01(V)(D)(2)(d) and this Court’s Order, Defendant The Village of Farmersville,…

Case Filed

Nov 02, 2005

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Nov 08, 2006

Category

OTHER TORT

preview-icon 3 pages

SED wwrne COURT OF COMMON PLEA: ay 25 PH I: 52 BUTLER COUNTY, OHIO 2006 M CITY OF HA HAMILTON, QHIO : Case No.: CV2006-02-0394 Sen Pla : Judge Pater GREGORY PARSLEY, ET AL Defendants (925 Greenwood Ave) Plaintiff now comes before the Court asking that they be permitted to enter on 925 Greenwood Ave, Hamilton, Butler County, Ohio, (legal description attached as Exhibit A) in order to obtain bids for demolition of the subject Property. Plaintiff was granted Default Judgment for this …

Case Filed

Feb 03, 2006

County

Butler County, OH

Filed Date

May 25, 2006

Judge

Pater, Honorable Charles L.

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope