Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 3745-100-08 | Exemptions.

                                                

[Comment: For dates of non-regulatory government
publications, publications of recognized organizations and associations,
federal rules, and federal statutory provisions referenced in this rule, see
paragraph (AA) of rule 3745-100-01 of the Administrative Code titled
"Referenced materials."]

(A) De minimis concentrations of a toxic
chemical in a mixture. If a toxic chemical is present in a mixture of chemicals
at a covered facility, and the toxic chemical is in a concentration in the
mixture which is below one per cent of the mixture, or 0.1 per cent of the
mixture in the case of a toxic chemical which is a carcinogen as defined in 29
CFR 1910.1200 (d)(4), a person is not required to consider the quantity of the
toxic chemical present in such mixture when determining whether an applicable
threshold has been met under rule 3745-100-06 of the Administrative Code or
determining the amount of release to be reported under rule 3745-100-07 of the
Administrative Code. This exemption applies whether the person received the
mixture from another person or the person produced the mixture, either by
mixing the chemicals involved or by causing a chemical reaction which resulted
in the creation of the toxic chemical in the mixture. However, this exemption
applies only to the quantity of the toxic chemical present in the mixture. If
the toxic chemical is also manufactured (including imported), processed or
otherwise used at the covered facility other than as part of the mixture or in
a mixture at higher concentrations in excess of an applicable threshold
quantity set forth in rule 3745-100-06 of the Administrative Code, the person
is required to report under rule 3745-100-07 of the Administrative Code. This
exemption does not apply to toxic chemicals listed in rule 3745-100-16 of the
Administrative Code, except for purposes of paragraph (D)(1) of rule
3745-100-09 of the Administrative Code.

(B) Articles. If a toxic chemical is
present in an article at a covered facility, a person is not required to
consider the quantity of the toxic chemical present in such article when
determining whether an applicable threshold has been met under rule
3745-100-06, 3745-100-14, or 3745-100-16 of the Administrative Code or
determining the amount of release to be reported under rule 3745-100-07 of the
Administrative Code. This exemption applies whether the person received the
article from another person or the person produced the article. However, this
exemption applies only to the quantity of the toxic chemical present in the
article. If the toxic chemical is manufactured (including imported), processed
or otherwise used at the covered facility other than as part of the article in
excess of an applicable threshold quantity set forth in rule 3745-100-06 of the
Administrative Code, the person is required to report under rule 3745-100-07 of
the Administrative Code. Persons potentially subject to this exemption should
carefully review the definitions of "article" and "release"
in rule 3745-100-01 of the Administrative Code. If a release of a toxic
chemical occurs as a result of the processing or use of an item at the
facility, that item does not meet the definition of
"article."

(C) Uses. If a toxic chemical is used at
a covered facility for a purpose described in paragraphs (C)(1) to (C)(5) of
this rule, a person is not required to consider the quantity of the toxic
chemical used for such purpose when determining whether an applicable threshold
has been met under rule 3745-100-06, 3745-100-14, or 3745-100-16 of the
Administrative Code or determining the amount of releases to be reported under
rule 3745-100-07 of the Administrative Code. However, this exemption only
applies to the quantity of the toxic chemical used for the purpose described in
paragraphs (C)(1) to (C)(5) of this rule. If the toxic chemical is also
manufactured (including imported), processed or otherwise used at the covered
facility other than as described in paragraphs (C)(1) to (C)(5) of this rule in
excess of an applicable threshold quantity set forth in rule 3745-100-06 of the
Administrative Code, the person is required to report under rule 3745-100-07 of
the Administrative Code. This exemption only applies to the quantity of the
toxic chemical for the following purposes:

(1) Use as a structural
component of the facility.

(2) Use of products for
routine janitorial or facility grounds maintenance. Examples include use of
janitorial cleaning supplies, fertilizers and pesticides similar in type or
concentration to consumer products.

(3) Personal use by
employees or other persons at the facility of foods, drugs, cosmetics or other
personal items containing toxic chemicals, including supplies of such products
within the facility such as in a facility-operated cafeteria, store or
infirmary.

(4) Use of products
containing toxic chemicals for the purpose of maintaining motor vehicles
operated by the facility.

(5) Use of toxic
chemicals present in process water and noncontact cooling water as drawn from
the environment or from municipal sources, or toxic chemicals present in air
used either as compressed air or as part of combustion.

(D) Activities in laboratories. If a
toxic chemical is manufactured, processed or used in a laboratory at a covered
facility under the supervision of a technically qualified individual as defined
in rule 3745-100-01 of the Administrative Code, a person is not required to
consider the quantity so manufactured, processed or used when determining
whether an applicable threshold has been met under rule 3745-100-06,
3745-100-14, or 3745-100-16 of the Administrative Code or determining the
amount of release to be reported under rule 3745-100-07 of the Administrative
Code. This exemption does not apply in the following cases:

(1) Specialty chemical
production.

(2) Manufacture,
processing or use of toxic chemicals in pilot plant scale
operations.

(3) Activities conducted
outside the laboratory.

(E) Certain owners of leased property.
The owner of a covered facility is not subject to reporting under rule
3745-100-07 of the Administrative Code if such owner's only interest in
the facility is ownership of the real estate upon which the facility is
operated. This exemption applies to owners of facilities such as industrial
parks, all or part of which are leased to persons who operate establishments in
any SIC code or NAICS code in rule 3745-100-17 of the Administrative Code that
are subject to the requirements of this part, where the owner has no other
business interest in the operation of the covered facility.

(F) Reporting by certain operators of
establishments on leased property such as industrial parks. If two or more
persons, who do not have any common corporate or business interest (including
common ownership or control), operate separate establishments within a single
facility, each such person shall treat the establishments that person operates
as a facility for purposes of this rule. The determinations in rules
3745-100-05 and 3745-100-06 of the Administrative Code shall be made for those
establishments. If any such operator determines that the establishment is a
covered facility under rule 3745-100-05 of the Administrative Code and that a
toxic chemical has been manufactured (including imported), processed or
otherwise used at the establishment in excess of an applicable threshold in
rule 3745-100-06 of the Administrative Code for a calendar year, the operator
shall submit a report in accordance with rule 3745-100-07 of the Administrative
Code for the establishment. For purposes of this, a common corporate or
business interest includes ownership, partnership, joint ventures, ownership of
a controlling interest in one person by the other, or ownership of a
controlling interest in both persons by a third person.

(G) Coal extraction activities. If a
toxic chemical is manufactured, processed, or otherwise used in extraction by
facilities in SIC code 12, or in NAICS codes 212111, 212112 or 212113, a person
is not required to consider the quantity of the toxic chemical so manufactured,
processed, or otherwise used when determining whether an applicable threshold
has been met under rule 3745-100-06, 3745-100-14, or 3745-100-16 of the
Administrative Code, or determining the amounts to be reported under rule
3745-100-07 of the Administrative Code.

(H) Metal mining overburden. If a toxic
chemical that is a constituent of overburden is processed or otherwise used by
facilities in SIC code 10, or in NAICS codes 212221, 212222, 212231, 212234 or
212299, a person is not required to consider the quantity of the toxic chemical
so processed, or otherwise used when determining whether an applicable
threshold has been met under rule 3745-100-06, 3745-100-14, or 3745-100-16 of
the Administrative Code, or determining the amounts to be reported under rule
3745-100-07 of the Administrative Code.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 8 pages

e-filed on 12/09/2014 at 10:09 AM in Wayne County, Ohio IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS WAYNE COUNTY, OHIO The Board of Health of the Wayne County : Case No. 2014 CVC-H 00343 Combined General Health District : Plaintiff, : Judge: Mark K. Wiest v. : Philip R. Cehrs : MOTION FOR CONTEMPT Defendant. : Now comes Plaintiff, the Board of Health of the Wayne County Combined General Health District, by and through the undersigned Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and respectfully requests this Court for …

County

Wayne County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 09, 2014

Category

OTHER CIVIL

Judge Hon. WIEST, MARK K Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for WIEST, MARK K
preview-icon 6 pages

COPY. con ZALESN! COURT OF COMMON PLEAS . CIVIL DIVISION ous DEC“ PHI 32 SUMMIT COUNTY siat STATE OF OHIO MARY SLIWINSKL, et al No. 2006 02 0884 : JUDGE COSGROVE vs. PLAINTIFE’S SECOND AMENDED REPLY TO DEFENDANT MOTION TO CAPITAL PROPERTIES DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MANAGEMENT LTD., et al. AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs re-amend their Reply in a single aspect because of the recently discovered ruling of the Ohio EPA that Defendants are a Public Water System that must comply with the law and reg…

County

Summit County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 04, 2006

Category

BREACH OF AGREEMENT

Judge

PATRICIA A COSGROVE

preview-icon 8 pages

R. KYLE WITT FAIRFIELD COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 239 W. Main Street Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 (740) 652-7560 (614) 322-5265 F: (740) 653-4708 ORIGINAL Amy Brown-Thompson (0070511) Steven Darnell (0098940) Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys Fairfield Cotinty Prosecutor's Office 239 West Main Street, Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130 Phone 740-652-7560 | Fax 740-653-4708 Amy.Brown-Thompson@fairfieldcountyohio.gov Attorney for the Fairfield County Board of Health IN COMPUTER 1023 HAR 3…

Case Filed

Mar 30, 2023

Case Status

Closed

County

Fairfield County, OH

Filed Date

Mar 30, 2023

Category

(CV) CIVIL

Judge Hon. BERENS, RICHARD E Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for BERENS, RICHARD E
preview-icon 3 pages

| (a ttinvnnenn FLED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 2006 NOY -B PH 2:50 BAR EDEEY CLERK GF COURTS - MONTGOMERY £0., OHIO poe IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO BLANE SCARBERRY, et al. : CASE NO. 05-8403 “ (Judge Mary Katherine Huffman) Plaintiffs vs. : DEFENDANT THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE, OHIO'S THE VILLAGE OF FARMERSVILLE,: DESIGNATION OF TRIAL OHIO MATERIALS Defendant Pursuant to Mont. Co. C.P.R. 2.01(V)(D)(2)(d) and this Court’s Order, Defendant The Village of Farmersville,…

Case Filed

Nov 02, 2005

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Nov 08, 2006

Category

OTHER TORT

preview-icon 3 pages

SED wwrne COURT OF COMMON PLEA: ay 25 PH I: 52 BUTLER COUNTY, OHIO 2006 M CITY OF HA HAMILTON, QHIO : Case No.: CV2006-02-0394 Sen Pla : Judge Pater GREGORY PARSLEY, ET AL Defendants (925 Greenwood Ave) Plaintiff now comes before the Court asking that they be permitted to enter on 925 Greenwood Ave, Hamilton, Butler County, Ohio, (legal description attached as Exhibit A) in order to obtain bids for demolition of the subject Property. Plaintiff was granted Default Judgment for this …

Case Filed

Feb 03, 2006

County

Butler County, OH

Filed Date

May 25, 2006

Judge

Pater, Honorable Charles L.

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope