Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 3701:1-66-10 | Computed tomography radiation-generating equipment.

                                                

This rule applies to mobile and stationary computed
tomography (CT) radiation-generating equipment, except for fluoroscopy units
with CT capability, CT units used exclusively for radiotherapy simulation, and
CT units integrated with linear accelerators.

(A) CT radiation-generating equipment
shall be maintained to meet the following equipment standards:

(1) The operator shall be
able to terminate x-ray exposure at any time during a scan or series of scans
of greater than 0.5 second duration;

(2) In the case of
premature termination of the x-ray exposure by the operator, the CT
radiation-generating equipment shall require the operator to reset CT
conditions of operation prior to the initiation of another scan;

(3) The CT x-ray control
and gantry shall provide visual indication whenever x-rays are
produced;

(4) If the x-ray
production period is less than 0.5 second, the indication of x-ray production
shall be actuated for at least 0.5 second. Visual indicators at or near the
gantry shall be discernible from any point external to the patient opening
where insertion of any part of the human body into the primary beam is
possible;

(5) Each emergency button
or switch shall be clearly labeled as to its function;

(6) The CT
radiation-generating equipment shall be designed such that the CT conditions of
operation are indicated prior to the initiation of a scan or a scan
sequence;

(7) The indicated table
increment shall not deviate from the actual table increment by more than one
millimeter;

(8) Means shall be
provided to permit visual determination of the location of the tomographic
plane or a reference plane. A reference plane may be offset from the location
of the tomographic plane(s);

(9) If a device using a
light source is used to satisfy paragraph (A)(8) of this rule, the light source
shall provide illumination levels sufficient to permit visual determination of
the location of the tomographic plane or reference plane under ambient light
conditions of up to five hundred lux; and

(10) The total error in
the indicated location of the tomographic plane or reference plane shall not
exceed five millimeters.

(B) In addition to paragraph (G) of rule
3701:1-66-02 of the Administrative Code, handlers of CT radiation-generating
equipment shall meet the following radiation safety requirements:

(1) Techniques shall be
provided in the vicinity of the control panel or on a pre-programmed menu,
based on patient age, weight, body mass index, or patient dimensions, as
appropriate, that specifies for each routine examination the CT conditions of
operation, including techniques specific to pediatric patient examinations, if
applicable;

(2) The limits of
radiation dose shall not exceed a volume computed tomography dose index
(CTDIvol):

(a) Eighty milligray (eight rad) for the facility's
routine adult head scan;

(b) Thirty milligray (three rad) for the facility's
routine adult or seventy kilogram (one hundred fifty-four pound) abdomen
scan;

(c) Twenty milligray (two rad) for the facility's
routine pediatric five-year old or eighteen kilogram (forty pound) abdomen
scan; and

(d) Forty milligray (four rad) for the facilitys
routine (one-year old) pediatric head scan;

(3) If the results of the
quality control tests, the image quality evaluations, or the radiation dose
measurements exceed a tolerance limit established by a radiation expert, use of
the CT radiation-generating equipment on patients shall be limited to those
uses permitted by written instruction of a radiation expert;

(4) Mobile CT
radiation-generating equipment, except for stationary CT radiation-generating
equipment installed in a van, trailer, or mobile vehicle and operator behind a
protective control booth, shall be provided with protective curtains of not
less than 0.25 millimeter lead equivalent that completely surrounds the gantry
bore during exposures, unless the protective curtains interfere with the
sterile field of a surgical procedure; and

(5) Any individual who is
in the room during a CT exposure shall stand clear of the gantry bore, and
shall stand behind a whole body protective barrier or wear a protective lead
apron of not less than 0.25 millimeter lead equivalent.

(C) In addition to other applicable
quality assurance requirements in rule 3701:1-66-04 of the Administrative Code,
handlers of CT radiation-generating equipment shall comply with the following
quality assurance requirements:

(1) The handler shall
designate and utilize a radiation expert who shall:

(a) Perform measurements of the radiation dose and image
quality prior to medical use:

(i) Upon
installation;

(ii) After repair or
replacement of any component of the CT equipment which may alter the radiation
output or image quality, prior to medical use, a radiation expert shall perform
and document measurements of radiation output, using a method specified by a
radiation expert in the quality assurance program, and image quality as
specified in paragraph (C)(1)(c) of this rule unless in the documented
determination of a radiation expert, the repair or replacement will not cause a
significant change in radiation output or significant degradation of image
quality as defined in the quality assurance program according to paragraph
(C)(1)(c) of this rule.

(a) The radiation expert
may designate qualified individuals to perform and document the measurements
specified in paragraph (C)(1)(a)(ii) of this rule;

(b) The criteria for
qualifying the designees specified in paragraph (C)(1)(a)(ii)(a) of this rule
shall be specified by a radiation expert in the quality assurance program;
and

(c) The radiation
experts approval of the designee's test results shall be documented
within thirty days;

(b) Perform measurements of radiation dose
annually;

(c) Perform evaluations of image quality at least annually
using a CT phantom which has the capability of providing an indication of CT
number accuracy for at least three materials. The evaluation of image quality
shall include CT number accuracy and uniformity, noise, artifacts, radiation
beam width, resolution for low and high contrast, alignment light accuracy, and
table travel accuracy; and

(d) . Develop the written quality control program conducted
by the CT technologist appropriate for the evaluation of the CT system that
includes the tests and allowable tolerance limits. The quality control
evaluation for image quality shall include the use of a water equivalent
phantom, and at a minimum, the evaluation of artifacts, noise, and CT number
accuracy. The evaluation of image quality shall be at a minimum completed
weekly;

(2) Written records of all image quality
evaluations and radiation dose measurements shall be maintained between
inspections for review by the department's inspector;

(3) The images for quality shall be
retained until a new image quality evaluation is performed as
follows:

(a) Photographic copies of the images obtained from the
image display device; or

(b) Images stored in digital form on a storage medium
compatible with the CT x-ray system;

(4) In consultation with
a radiation expert, develop and implement a written program for radiation dose
optimization and scan protocol review. The protocol review must include
perfusion studies, if performed. The written program shall be audited by a
radiation expert on an annual basis;

(5) Radiation dose
measurements shall be performed using clinical protocols representative of the
utilization of the CT unit. If protocols are estimated, measurements must be
based on a sample of actual patient data. The specific CT conditions of
operation shall be documented for each protocol:

(a) Radiation dose measurements shall be expressed in terms
of CTDIvol;

(b) Radiation dose measurements shall be performed using a
CT dosimetry phantom that meets the following specifications and conditions of
use:

(i) The CT dosimetry
phantom shall be a right circular cylinder of a material having approximate
tissue equivalence of one gram per cubic centimeter. The phantom shall be at
least fourteen centimeters in length and shall have diameters of thirty-two
centimeters for measuring radiation dose from the adult abdomen scan protocol
and sixteen centimeters for measuring radiation dose from the head and
pediatric abdomen scan protocols;

(ii) The CT dosimetry
phantom shall provide a means for the placement of a dosimeter along the axis
of rotation and along a line parallel to the axis of rotation on the outer
surface or within one centimeter from the outer surface and within the phantom.
Means for the placement of dosimeters or alignment devices at other locations
may be provided;

(iii) Any effects on the
doses measured due to the removal of phantom material to accommodate dosimeters
shall be accounted for through appropriate corrections to the reported data or
included in the statement of maximum deviation for the values obtained using
the phantom; and

(iv) All dose
measurements shall be performed with the CT dosimetry phantom placed on the
patient couch or support device without additional attenuation materials
present;

(c) Radiation dose measurements shall be performed with a
calibrated dosimetry system. The calibration of such system shall be traceable
to a national standard, or cross-calibrated with a dosimetry system whose
calibration is traceable to a national standard. Records of these calibrations
shall be readily available for review upon inspection. The dosimetry system
shall have been calibrated within the preceding two years; and

(d) Requirements of paragraphs (C)(5)(a) and (C)(5)(b) of
this rule may be satisfied by an alternative nationally-recognized standard for
CT dosimetry. If an alternate dosimetry method is used, a radiation expert
shall document the procedures in the written quality assurance
program.

(D) Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)
scanners and hybrid imaging systems, with the exception of CBCT units
integrated with linear accelerators, shall comply with the following
rules:

(1) Under the guidance of
a radiation expert, handlers of CBCT units shall develop and implement a
written quality control testing program to include test procedures, test
frequencies, and tolerance limits;

(2) The written quality
control testing program must include an annual testing component to be
performed by a radiation expert. This annual testing component must be
performed upon installation of new CBCT units and annually
thereafter;

(3) The annual tests to
be performed by a radiation expert must include an assessment of radiation dose
and an evaluation of image quality;

(4) Records of all
quality control tests shall be documented and retained between
inspections;

(5) CBCT scanners are
exempt from paragraphs (B)(2) and (C)(5) of this rule; and

(6) SPECT/CT and PET/CT
units used exclusively for hybrid imaging shall be in compliance with paragraph
(B)(2) of this rule if protocols used to scan the head satisfy the limits of
paragraph (B)(2)(a) of this rule and protocols used to scan the abdomen satisfy
the limits of paragraph (B)(2)(b) of this rule.

(E) Micro-CT units equipped with an x-ray
tube enclosure designed to exclude personnel from its interior during x-ray
generation shall be exempt from paragraphs (A) to (D) of this rule, and shall
comply with the requirements set forth in rule 3701:1-68-06 of the
Administrative Code.

(F) Mobile CT radiation-generating
equipment permanently mounted on a base with wheels or castors for moving while
completely assembled and not used in one place are exempt from paragraphs
(H)(4) and (H)(5) of rule 3701:1-66-02 of the Administrative Code.

(G) Handlers of CT radiation-generating
equipment used for veterinary purposes are exempt from the requirements of
paragraphs (B)(2) and (C)(4) of this rule.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 5 pages

. w wo ey 99 i i gat COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ¢.; f ane BUTLER COUNTY, OHIO ot g 7, vie \ A wie X 20 aw ro Wire, | 3°05 1576 BUTLER cana OF HEALTH | Case No. Lok i \ iv . et - 130 High Sty) buF ; Hamilton, ot eae Oey Plaintiff RTS COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTION v. JOSEPH D. ELKINS 3900 Withrow Rd. | Hamilton, OH 45011 i Defendant(s) 1. Plaintiff is the board of health of the Butler County General Health District. 2. Defendant(is) is/are the owner(s) of real property locat…

Case Filed

May 24, 2013

County

Butler County, OH

Filed Date

May 24, 2013

Judge Hon. Andrew Nastoff Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Andrew Nastoff
preview-icon 7 pages

& ~ ed e Ww 98 yA\ COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 4 aoe ees COUNTY, OHIO 2013 05 1572 TLER EALTH | ‘ase No. Meaty BUTLER CO SR | Case N oy eat 301 S. Third St@U ge BY i Judge BUTLER COUNTY Hamilton, OH 4 | CLERK OF COURTS Plaintiff v. | COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTION WILLIAM JONES JR. i 3206 Trenton Oxford Rd. Hamilton, OH 45011 CYNTHIA J. JONES 3206 Trenton Oxford Rd. Hamilton, OH 45011 Defendant(s) 1. Plaintiff is the board of health of the Butler County General Health District. 2. Defendant…

Case Filed

May 24, 2013

County

Butler County, OH

Filed Date

May 24, 2013

Judge Hon. Keith M. Spaeth Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Keith M. Spaeth
preview-icon 5 pages

ow w ay tee i, “ 4 Sect y gat 3! COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 20) 2» BUTLER COUNTY, OHIO 3 05 ' ot te ba 975 BUTLER COUNTY Bi SF HEALTH | — Case No. Quibig 2% 301 S. ThinE SKS oF Judge CLERIE Ge COUNTY Hamilton, AY @891 1 | COURTS Plaintiff | v. | COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTION THELMA HACKER : 7431 Kyles Station Rd. Liberty Township, OH 45044-9424 i Defendant(s) i 1. Plaintiff is the board of health of the Butler County General Health District. 2. Defendant(is) is/are the owner(s) of real property loc…

County

Butler County, OH

Filed Date

May 24, 2013

Category

CIVIL - GENERAL

Judge

Hedric, Honorable Craig D.

preview-icon 4 pages

ELECTRONICALLY FILED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Monday, February 8, 2021 11:37:00 PM CASE NUMBER: 2020 CR 03129 Docket ID: 35220669 …

Case Filed

Oct 05, 2020

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Feb 08, 2021

preview-icon 4 pages

E0137 - C60 e ‘ ~ OHIO DEPT. OF HEALTH IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF FRANKLIN co! CIVIL DIVISION 2010 JUN 23 mM ea GENERAL COUNSEL STAN'S BAR & GRILL INC. 757 West 2™ Street Xenia, Ohio 45385 Appellant, v carne, JO CVF06 * 9351 OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CD ow oo eS 3% Ee * > & YE 246 North High Street es es Columbus, Ohio 43215 - 8S cam : ¢ Be Appellee. S 2 nO =a = =e NOTICE OF APPEAL Ye %B oe < In accordance with the provisions of R.C. 119 12, Appellant hereby gives notice of its a…

Case Name 10 CV 009351
Case Filed

Jun 23, 2010

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

Jun 23, 2010

Judge Hon. ANDY D MILLER Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for ANDY D MILLER
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope