Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 3701-42-08 | Abuse of the WIC program; sanctions.

                                                

(A) The director shall sanction vendors
that abuse the WIC program. The vendor violations referenced in paragraphs (B)
to (E) of this rule constitute abuse of the WIC program. The director may
sanction a vendor for any violation of this chapter of the Administrative Code
that does not constitute abuse. The director will provide the vendor with a
notice that violations are occurring that may lead to mandatory sanctions under
paragraph (C)(4) or (D) of this rule prior to taking action, unless providing
such notice compromises an investigation.

(B) The director shall terminate a
contract and disqualify a vendor for a period of six years if the director
finds that the vendor has exchanged WIC nutrition cards or the benefits
contained on the card for cash, firearms, ammunition, explosives, or controlled
substances as defined in 21 U.S.C. 802 (in effect on January 3,
2012).

(C) The director shall terminate a
contract and disqualify a vendor for a period of three years if the director
finds that the vendor has:

(1) Exchanged WIC
nutrition cards or the benefits contained on the card for alcohol or alcoholic
beverages or tobacco products;

(2) Transacted WIC
nutrition card benefits for a specific authorized food, which exceeds the
vendor's documented inventory of that authorized food for a specific
period of time;

(3) Failed to respond and
provide the requested original documents for verification of authorized food
purchases and sales as set forth in paragraph (H) of rule 3701-42-06 of the
Administrative Code; or

(4) Engaged in a pattern of any of the
following:

(a) Exchanging WIC nutrition cards or the benefits contained on
the card for credit, including rain checks, or non-food items;

(b) Redeeming WIC nutrition card benefits for authorized foods
not received by the participants;

(c) Redeeming WIC nutrition card benefits for which the reported
amount of sale is more than the marked or posted prices charged to other
customers regardless of the not to exceed amount for the item(s)
purchased;

(d) Seeking reimbursement from the department for WIC nutrition
card benefits submitted through an authorized vendor while not authorized as a
vendor under rule 3701-42-03 of the Administrative Code.

(D) The director shall terminate a
contract and disqualify a vendor for a period of one year if the director finds
that the vendor has engaged in a pattern of providing unauthorized food items
in exchange for benefits on the WIC nutrition card, including charging for
authorized foods provided in excess of those on the WIC nutrition
card.

(E) The director shall terminate a
contract and disqualify from the WIC program a vendor who has been disqualified
from the food assistance program. The disqualification from the WIC program
shall be for the same length of time as the disqualification from the food
assistance program. The disqualification from the WIC program may begin at a
later date than the food assistance program disqualification and shall take
effect on the date the vendor receives notice of WIC disqualification.
Termination and disqualification from the WIC program under this paragraph is
not subject to an administrative or abbreviated review as set forth in rule
3701-42-09 of the Administrative Code.

(F) The director shall terminate a
contract of a vendor who has been suspended, disqualified, withdrawn or
otherwise no longer authorized by the food assistance program. Contract
termination pursuant to this paragraph is not subject to an administrative or
abbreviated review as set forth in rule 3701-42-09 of the Administrative
Code.

(G) Prior to terminating a contract and imposing disqualification
of a vendor pursuant to paragraphs (B) to (D) of this rule, the director shall
consider whether the disqualification of the vendor would result in inadequate
participant access. If the director determines that the disqualification would
result in inadequate participant access, the director shall assess a civil
money penalty in lieu of the disqualification. The amount of the civil money
penalty shall be determined in accordance with paragraph (O) of this
rule.

(H) The director shall double the civil money penalty for a
second sanction when a vendor, that has been previously disqualified or
assessed a civil money penalty pursuant to paragraphs (B) to (D) of this rule,
receives another sanction pursuant to paragraphs (B) to (D) of this rule. A
civil money penalty may only be doubled up to the limits allowed under
paragraph (O) of this rule.

(I) The director shall double the civil money penalty for the
third and subsequent sanctions when a vendor that has been previously assessed
two or more sanctions pursuant to paragraphs (B) to (D) of this rule and
receives another sanction pursuant to paragraphs (B) to (D) of this rule. The
director shall not assess a civil money penalty in lieu of disqualification for
third and subsequent sanctions pursuant to paragraphs (B) to (D) of this
rule.

(J) Notwithstanding paragraph (B) of this rule, the director
shall terminate a vendor contract and permanently disqualify from the WIC
program a vendor that has been convicted in a court of law for trafficking in
WIC nutrition cards or benefits on the cards or selling firearms, ammunition,
explosives, or controlled substances as defined in 21 U.S.C. 802 (in effect on
January 3, 2012), in exchange for WIC nutrition cards or benefits on the
cards.

(K) The director may terminate a contract and disqualify from the
WIC program a vendor whose WIC sales exceed fifty per cent of its gross food
sales.

(L) The director may sanction a vendor that has committed one or
more vendor violations of this chapter that do not constitute abuse by doing
either of the following:

(1) Terminating a vendor
contract and disqualifying the vendor from the WIC program for a period of not
more than one year for one or more violations resulting from a single
investigation; or

(2) Assessing a civil
money penalty in accordance with amount set forth in the current effective
version of 7 CFR 3.91(b)(3) (as in effect on the effective date of this
rule).

(M) The director may terminate a contract and disqualify from the
WIC program a vendor that has been assessed a civil money penalty in the food
assistance program, as provided under 7 C.F.R. 278.6 (in effect on January 1,
2012). The length of such disqualification shall correspond to the period for
which the vendor would otherwise have been disqualified from the food
assistance program. If the director determines that disqualification of the
vendor would result in inadequate participant access, the director shall not
disqualify the vendor nor impose a civil money penalty in lieu of
disqualification.

(N) The director may choose to impose a
civil money penalty in lieu of termination and disqualification from the WIC
program if the director determines that it is in the best interest of the WIC
program.

(O) The director shall use the following formula to calculate a
civil money penalty imposed in lieu of disqualification pursuant to paragraph
(G) or (N) of this rule:

(1) Determine the
vendor's average monthly redemptions for at least the six month period
ending with the month immediately preceding the month during which the notice
of administrative action is dated;

(2) Multiply the average
monthly redemptions figure by ten per cent;

(3) Multiply the product
from paragraph (O)(2) of this rule by the number of months for which the
location would have been disqualified; and

(4) Civil money
penalty amounts will not exceed the penalty amounts as set forth in the current
version of 7 CFR 3.91(b)(3) (as in effect on the effective date of this
rule).

(P) In determining the period of disqualification to impose or
amount of civil money penalty to assess a vendor pursuant to paragraph (O) of
this rule, the director shall consider at least the following
factors:

(1) The vendor's
compliance history;

(2) The severity or
nature of the violation;

(3) The potential
monetary loss to the state WIC program; and

(4) The vendor's
volume of WIC business.

(Q) If a vendor does not pay, only partially pays, or fails to
timely pay a civil money penalty assessed in lieu of disqualification, the
director shall terminate the contract and disqualify the vendor for the length
of the disqualification corresponding to the violation for which the civil
money penalty was assessed. The director may withhold any current or future
payments due to the vendor to offset any payment owed by the vendor to the
department.

(R) The director shall refer a vendor that is disqualified from
participating in the WIC program or assessed a civil money penalty in lieu of
disqualification from the WIC program to FNS for possible disqualification from
participation in the food assistance program. The director shall refer a vendor
that abuses the WIC program to federal, state, or local authorities for
criminal prosecution under applicable statutes, where appropriate.

(S) The director shall not accept a vendor's voluntary
withdrawal or non-renewal of the contract as an alternative to disqualification
when the director is required or has started the process to disqualify the
vendor pursuant to this rule. Even if the vendor attempts to voluntarily
withdraw or does not renew the contract in lieu of disqualification the
director shall enter the disqualification on the record.

(T) Except for permanent disqualification pursuant to paragraph
(J) of this rule, a vendor that has been disqualified from the WIC program may
apply for a new vendor contract in accordance with rule 3701-42-03 of the
Administrative Code after the period of disqualification has
expired.

(U) A vendor who commits fraud or engages
in other illegal activity is subject to prosecution under applicable federal,
state, or local laws.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 5 pages

. w wo ey 99 i i gat COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ¢.; f ane BUTLER COUNTY, OHIO ot g 7, vie \ A wie X 20 aw ro Wire, | 3°05 1576 BUTLER cana OF HEALTH | Case No. Lok i \ iv . et - 130 High Sty) buF ; Hamilton, ot eae Oey Plaintiff RTS COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTION v. JOSEPH D. ELKINS 3900 Withrow Rd. | Hamilton, OH 45011 i Defendant(s) 1. Plaintiff is the board of health of the Butler County General Health District. 2. Defendant(is) is/are the owner(s) of real property locat…

Case Filed

May 24, 2013

County

Butler County, OH

Filed Date

May 24, 2013

Judge Hon. Andrew Nastoff Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Andrew Nastoff
preview-icon 7 pages

& ~ ed e Ww 98 yA\ COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 4 aoe ees COUNTY, OHIO 2013 05 1572 TLER EALTH | ‘ase No. Meaty BUTLER CO SR | Case N oy eat 301 S. Third St@U ge BY i Judge BUTLER COUNTY Hamilton, OH 4 | CLERK OF COURTS Plaintiff v. | COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTION WILLIAM JONES JR. i 3206 Trenton Oxford Rd. Hamilton, OH 45011 CYNTHIA J. JONES 3206 Trenton Oxford Rd. Hamilton, OH 45011 Defendant(s) 1. Plaintiff is the board of health of the Butler County General Health District. 2. Defendant…

Case Filed

May 24, 2013

County

Butler County, OH

Filed Date

May 24, 2013

Judge Hon. Keith M. Spaeth Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Keith M. Spaeth
preview-icon 5 pages

ow w ay tee i, “ 4 Sect y gat 3! COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 20) 2» BUTLER COUNTY, OHIO 3 05 ' ot te ba 975 BUTLER COUNTY Bi SF HEALTH | — Case No. Quibig 2% 301 S. ThinE SKS oF Judge CLERIE Ge COUNTY Hamilton, AY @891 1 | COURTS Plaintiff | v. | COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTION THELMA HACKER : 7431 Kyles Station Rd. Liberty Township, OH 45044-9424 i Defendant(s) i 1. Plaintiff is the board of health of the Butler County General Health District. 2. Defendant(is) is/are the owner(s) of real property loc…

County

Butler County, OH

Filed Date

May 24, 2013

Category

CIVIL - GENERAL

Judge

Hedric, Honorable Craig D.

preview-icon 4 pages

ELECTRONICALLY FILED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Monday, February 8, 2021 11:37:00 PM CASE NUMBER: 2020 CR 03129 Docket ID: 35220669 …

Case Filed

Oct 05, 2020

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Feb 08, 2021

preview-icon 4 pages

E0137 - C60 e ‘ ~ OHIO DEPT. OF HEALTH IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF FRANKLIN co! CIVIL DIVISION 2010 JUN 23 mM ea GENERAL COUNSEL STAN'S BAR & GRILL INC. 757 West 2™ Street Xenia, Ohio 45385 Appellant, v carne, JO CVF06 * 9351 OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CD ow oo eS 3% Ee * > & YE 246 North High Street es es Columbus, Ohio 43215 - 8S cam : ¢ Be Appellee. S 2 nO =a = =e NOTICE OF APPEAL Ye %B oe < In accordance with the provisions of R.C. 119 12, Appellant hereby gives notice of its a…

Case Name 10 CV 009351
Case Filed

Jun 23, 2010

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

Jun 23, 2010

Judge Hon. ANDY D MILLER Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for ANDY D MILLER
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope