Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 3332-1-29 | Valid reasons for accessing confidential personal information.

                                                

Pursuant to the requirements of division (B)(2) of section 1347.15 of the Revised Code, this rule contains a list of valid reasons, directly related to the board's exercise of its powers or duties, for which only employees of the board may access confidential personal information (CPI) regardless of whether the personal information system is a manual system or computer system:

(A) Performing the following functions constitute valid reasons for authorized employees of the board to access confidential personal information:

(1) Responding to a public records request;

(2) Responding to a request from an individual for the list of CPI the agency maintains on that individual;

(3) Administering a constitutional provision or duty;

(4) Administering a statutory provision or duty;

(5) Administering an administrative rule provision or duty;

(6) Complying with any state or federal program requirements;

(7) Processing or payment of claims or otherwise administering a program with individual participants or beneficiaries;

(8) Auditing purposes;

(9) Licensure, certification or agent permit processing, including application review and verification;

(10) Investigation or law enforcement purposes;

(11) Administrative hearings;

(12) Litigation, complying with an order of the court, or subpoena;

(13) Human resource matters including hiring, promotion, demotion, discharge, salary or compensation issues, leave requests or issues, timesheet approvals or issues and payroll processing;

(14) Complying with an executive order or policy;

(15) Complying with a board policy or a state administrative policy issued by the department of administrative services, the office of budget and management or other similar state agency; or

(16) Complying with a collective bargaining agreement provision.

(B) To the extent that the general processes described in paragraph (A) of this rule do not cover the following circumstances, for the purpose of carrying out specific duties of the board, authorized employees would also have valid reasons for accessing CPI in these following circumstances:

(1) Employees or contractors conducting investigations or onsite school reviews may review CPI of individuals who are subject to investigation for alleged misconduct that may result in school discipline. Such employees or contractors may review CPI of individuals who are not the subject of the investigation, but who otherwise may be witnesses with information related to the investigation. CPI may be reviewed by such employees, contractors, and members of the board in investigative matters that become the subject of administrative hearings.

(2) Employees or contractors conducting investigations or reviews of closed schools may review CPI of individuals contained in closed school records for the purpose of locating the individuals or for the purpose of determining eligibility for tuition refunds or student loan discharges.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 8 pages

Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2018 Jul 12 10:29 AM-18CV005958 0E235 - K6é2 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO GROOVE U Ltd 5030 Bradenton Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 Plaintiff, v. Case No. Richard Brent Vaughan 3352 Darbyshire Dr. Hilliard, Ohio 43026 Defendant. COMPLAINT 1. On or about January 12, 2016, defendant, Richard Brent Vaughan, entered into an enrollment agreement with plaintiff, GROOVE U Ltd, whereby in consideration of plaintiff pr…

Case Name 18 CV 005958
Case Filed

Jul 12, 2018

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

Jul 12, 2018

Judge Hon. DAVID C YOUNG Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for DAVID C YOUNG
preview-icon 28 pages

ELECTRONICALLY FILED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Thursday, May 18, 2017 2:13:31 PM CASE NUMBER: 2017 CV 02373 Docket ID: 30898549 …

Case Filed

May 18, 2017

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

May 18, 2017

Category

CIVIL ALL OTHER

preview-icon 6 pages

Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2015 Aug 24 9:57 AM-15CV006906 Oc649 - U8 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO BARRY H. FROMM CASE NO. 15-CV-006906 Plaintiff, JUDGE CHRIS M. BROWN …

Case Filed

Aug 10, 2015

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

Aug 24, 2015

Judge

CHRIS M BROWN

preview-icon 7 pages

Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2017 Nov 08 12:59 PM-17CV009767 OD891 - N92 IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO HONDROS COLLEGE, INC., CASE NO. 17 CV 009767 Plaintiff, JUDGE CHRIS BROWN vs. DAVIS COLLEGE, INC., ET AL., Defendants. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Defendants, Davis College, Inc. (“Davis”) and The CE Shop, Inc. (“CE Shop” and, collectively with Davis, “Defendants”) hereby move the Court pursuant…

Case Name 17 CV 009767
Case Filed

Nov 01, 2017

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

Nov 08, 2017

Judge Hon. Christopher Brown Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Christopher Brown
preview-icon 6 pages

Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2015 Aug 10 5:21 PM-15CV006906 0C630 - U9 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO BARRY H. FROMM, 2460 Stonehaven Court North Columbus, Ohio 43220, Plaintiff, v. Case No. BLUELINE CLASSICS, LLC, 12496 York Rd., Ste. A …

Case Filed

Aug 10, 2015

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

Aug 10, 2015

Judge

CHRIS M BROWN

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope