Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
(A) This rule amplifies section 4 of Substitute S.B. 343 of the 129th General Assembly.
(B) For purposes of this rule, "service credit" means all of the following:
(1) Service credit that may be purchased or obtained under former division (H) of section 145.01 and former sections 145.20, 145.201, 145.28, 145.29, 145.291, 145.293, 145.299, 145.30, and 145.47 of the Revised Code, as those sections existed immediately prior to January 7, 2013.
(2) Additional contributions paid by a member under former division (Y) of section 145.01 of the Revised Code, as that section existed immediately prior to January 7, 2013.
(3) Service credit that may be purchased under section 145.301 of the Revised Code.
(4) Service credit that may be purchased or obtained under section 145.814 of the Revised Code or rule 145-2-18 or 145-3-40 of the Administrative Code for an election that is effective on or before July 1, 2013, under section 2.03 of the combined or member-directed plan document, as amended on January 7, 2013.
(C) Except as provided in paragraph (E) of this rule, each member who is purchasing or is eligible to purchase service credit must initiate or continue the purchase by making one or more direct payments to the public employees retirement system during the period beginning on January 7, 2013, and ending on July 7, 2013, or by commencing a payroll deduction during the same period as described in this rule and in rule 145-1-38 of the Administrative Code. A payroll deduction shall be initiated if the system receives a payroll deduction form with a postmark date that is on or after January 7, 2013, but not later than July 7, 2013, and the amount to be deducted from the members payroll is received by the system not later than one hundred twenty days after the postmark date.
(D) Except as provided in paragraph (E) of this rule, each member is who eligible to obtain service credit under former section 145.30 of the Revised Code shall initiate a request to obtain the credit during the six-month period described in paragraph (C) of this rule. A request shall be initiated if the system receives during the same period described in this paragraph the members report(s) of separation (form DD214) or other satisfactory documentation as evidence of the members military service accompanied by a request by the member to obtain the credit.
(E) A member who, by reason of service in the uniformed services as defined in section 145.302 of the Revised Code, is prevented from taking action under paragraph (C) of this rule may, not later than ninety days after the reemployment with members public employer, apply to the system to have reestablished all or a portion of the six-month period described that paragraph. The member shall submit to the system report(s) of separation (form DD214) or other satisfactory documentation as evidence of the members military service.
(F) A member who, as of January 7, 2013, has made a partial payment or is subject to a post-tax payroll deduction agreement for the purchase of service credit under section 145.201 of the Revised Code may, during the six-month period described in paragraph (C) of this rule, request that the members cost statement or payroll deduction agreement be recalculated to include any additional credit the member is eligible to purchase under section 145.201 of the Revised Code. If the system does not receive a request from the member prior to the end of the six-month period, any additional credit the member is eligible to purchase under section 145.201 of the Revised Code shall be eligible for purchase under rules 145-2-02 and 145-3-23 of the Administrative Code.
(G) A member described in division (C) of section 4 of Substitute S.B. 343 of the 129th General Assembly is ineligible to purchase additional service credit as described in that division if any of the service upon which the purchase is based has a monthly earnable salary of less than one thousand dollars.
(H) A purchase of service credit under this rule shall be completed by the member not later than July 7, 2018.
Jul 06, 1983
Other
Hon. DDW
Adams County
Adams County, OH
Mar 12, 1993
Judgment of Divorce,Annulment,Separation
Hon. DDW
Adams County
Adams County, OH
Nov 06, 1986
Other
Hon. DDW
Adams County
Adams County, OH
Dec 29, 1994
Dismissal
Hon. BMS
Adams County
Adams County, OH
Oct 21, 2015
Appealed
Cuyahoga County
Cuyahoga County, OH
CASE N0._ $ ;7 ifr.Sfc+k-L ASSIGNED JUDGE 2f VS □ 02 REASSIGNED D □ □ 1 81 JURY TRIAL 89 DI…
0n263 Keranktin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2013 Jul 17 12:49 PM-13CV007750 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION STATE OF OHIO ex rel. PHYLLIS CUMMERLANDER : 5465 Walshire Drive : CASE NO. Columbus, Ohio 43215 3 Realtor : vs. : PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES : RETIREMENT SYSTEM : JUDGE: 277 East Town Street 3 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Respondent and OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM BOARD OF TRUSTEES 277 East Town St…
Franklin County, OH
Jul 17, 2013
DAN HAWKINS
Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2013 Jul 17 12:49 PM-13CV007750 0B263 - K13 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION STATE OF OHIO ex rel. PHYLLIS CUMMERLANDER : 5465 Walshire Drive : CASE NO. Columbus, Ohio 43215 3 Realtor : vs. : PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES : RETIREMENT SYSTEM : JUDGE: 277 East Town Street 3 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Respondent and OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM BOARD OF TRUSTEES 277 East To…
Franklin County, OH
Jul 17, 2013
DAN HAWKINS
Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2021 Jun 09 4:14 PM-19CV001846 OF527 - A18 IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO William M. Wion, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 19CV001846 Vv. Judge Holbrook Rob…
Filed on 07/24/2014 at 10:15 AM in Wayne County, Ohio IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CASE NO. 13-CV-0687 JUDGE MARK WIEST WAYNE COUNTY, OHIO CHRISTIAN LORENCE FIRST, by and through his next best friend, ELSA MILLER, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. Defendants. DEFENDANT STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (hereinafter “State Farm”), by and through the …
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.