Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 126-2-01 | Lack of funds.

                                                

(A) As used in this rule:

(1) "Appropriation," "Disbursement,"
"Expenditure," "Encumbrancing document," "Fund,"
and "Warrant" have the same meaning as defined in section 131.01 of
the Revised Code.

(2) "Lack of funds" has the
same meaning as defined in section 124.321 of the Revised Code.

(B) This rule applies to appointing authorities that employ
persons whose salary or wage is paid by warrant of the director of budget and
management, the director shall determine whether there is a lack of funds
within an appointing authority such that employees may be laid off under
section 124.321 of the Revised Code.

(C) If an appointing authority determines
it is necessary to reduce its workforce pursuant to section 124.321 of the
Revised Code, the appointing authority may request the director of budget and
management to determine if a lack of funds exists.

(D)

(1) The director shall
first determine whether an appropriation or fund within an appointing authority
has a current or projected deficiency of funding necessary to maintain current,
or to sustain projected levels of staffing and operations.

In order to make such a determination, the
director shall consider the following:

(a) The expenditures already charged to the appropriation, the
encumbrancing documents reserved against the appropriation, and the projected
disbursements for the remainder of the fiscal year, including termination or
unemployment costs that may be incurred in the event of a layoff.

(b) The adjusted, remaining amount of appropriation in the fiscal
year.

(c) If the appropriation is made from a fund other than the
general revenue fund, the cash balance of and anticipated revenues in the
fund.

(2) If the director determines that the
adjusted, remaining amount of appropriation or, if applicable, the fund's
cash balance and anticipated revenues are not sufficient to pay for the current
expenditures, emcumbrancing documents, and projected disbursements identified
in paragraph (D)(1)(a) of this rule for the remainder of the fiscal year, the
director shall find that the appropriation or fund has a current or projected
deficiency of funding.

(E)

(1) If the director finds
that an appropriation or fund has a current or projected deficiency of funding
under paragraph (D) of this rule, the director may analyze all appropriations
made to the appointing authority in order to determine whether there is a lack
of funds within an appointing authority.

In order to make such a determination, the
director shall consider the following:

(a) For each appropriation expenditures already charged to the
appropriation, the encumbrancing documents reserved against the appropriation,
and the projected disbursements for the remainder of the fiscal year, including
termination or unemployment costs that may be incurred in the event of a
layoff.

(b) For each appropriation, the adjusted, remaining amount of
appropriation in the fiscal year.

(c) If the appropriation is made from a fund other than the
general revenue fund, the cash balance of and the anticipated revenues in the
fund.

(2) If the director determines that the
adjusted, remaining amount of appropriation and anticipated revenues in all
funds, inclusive of any transfer of all or part of an appropriation or cash
between funds or appropriation items or other appropriate action that is
otherwise authorized by law would not correct a current deficiency or avoid a
projected deficiency of funding in an appropriation or fund because the
adjusted, remaining appropriation and anticipated revenues are not sufficient
to pay for the current expenditures, encumbrancing documents, and projected
disbursements identified in paragraph (D)(1)(a) of this rule, the director may
find that there is a lack of funds within the appointing
authority.

(3) In order to make such
a determination, the director may also consider whether a transfer of all or
part of an appropriation or cash in excess of need between funds or
appropriation items or other appropriate action that is otherwise authorized by
law would correct a current deficiency or avoid a projected deficiency of
funding in an appropriation or fund.

(F)

(1) Notwithstanding
paragraphs (D) and (E) of this rule, the director may determine that there is a
lack of funds within an appointing authority if the director finds that a
program within the appointing authority has a current or projected deficiency
of funding, necessary to maintain current, or to sustain projected levels of
program staffing and operations for the programs funded by the federal
government, special revenue accounts, or proprietary accounts.

In order to make such a determination, the
director shall consider the following:

(a) For any appropriation made to the appointing authority for
the program and any fund which appears to have a deficiency of funding for the
program, the adjusted, remaining amount of appropriation in the fiscal
year.

(b) The program expenditures already charged to the
appropriation, the encumbrancing documents reserved against the appropriation,
and the projected disbursements for the remainder of the fiscal year, including
termination or unemployment costs that may be incurred in the event of a
layoff.

(c) Whether the cash balance and anticipated revenues in the fund
supporting the program are sufficient to maintain the current or projected
levels of program staffing and operations.

(d) If the director determines that the fund's cash balance
and anticipated revenues are not sufficient to maintain the current or
projected levels of program staffing and operations, the director may find that
the fund has a current, or to sustain projected deficiency of funding. On the
basis of such a deficiency, the director may find that there is a lack of funds
within an appointing authority.

(2) For purposes of this
paragraph, the director shall determine which accounts constitute "special
revenue accounts" and "proprietary accounts" as indicated by the
prevailing appropriations acts of the general assembly.

(G) For the purposes of paragraphs (E)
and (F) of this rule, the director is not required to analyze all
appropriations made to the appointing authority. The director is not required
to ascertain whether a transfer of all or part of an appropriation or a
transfer between funds of all or part of a cash balance in excess of need or
other action would correct a current, or to sustain projected deficiency of
funding necessary to maintain current or projected levels of program staffing
and operations.

(H) Whenever a program receives funding
through a grant or similar mechanism, a lack of funds shall be presumed for the
positions assigned to and the employees who work under the program if the
funding is reduced or withdrawn for any reason.

(I) Notwithstanding the other paragraphs
of this rule, the director may determine that there is a lack of funds within
an appointing authority if the cash balance of a fund appropriated for both
employee compensation and state distributed subsidy or grant payments has a
current or projected deficiency in cash for those purposes. In making this
determination, the director may consider the legally authorized expenditures of
the fund, the intent of the subsidy or grant payments, and the need to continue
to make such subsidy or grant payments.

(J) After following the provisions of this rule, the director
shall make a determination regarding the status of funds within the appointing
authority. If the director finds that there is a lack of funds within an
appointing authority, the director shall inform the appointing authority of the
amount of the current or projected deficiency of funding necessary to maintain
current, or to sustain projected levels of staffing and
operations.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 4 pages

Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2021 Dec 07 4:22 PM-21CV007617 OF727 - O51 FORM 26. CIVIL FEE WAIVER AFFIDAVIT AND ORDER in THE COMMON PLEAS COURT FRANKLIN COUNTY, GHIO FEVEN DEMOZ } Plaintiff, } JUDGE ) VS. ) y FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE / FEE- TEKLE ROMANO, et al., } WAIVER AFFIDAVIT Defendant. } AND ORDER Pursuant to R.C, 2323.3 11, the below-named Applicant requests that the Court determine that the Applicant is an indigent Utigant and be granted a waiver of the prep…

Case Filed

Dec 07, 2021

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 07, 2021

Judge Hon. KIM J BROWN Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for KIM J BROWN
preview-icon 2 pages

ELECTRONICALLY FILED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Friday, J uly 7, 2017 8:21:28 AM CASE NUMBER: 2016 CR 00265 Docket ID: 31082716 GREGORY A BRUSH …

Case Filed

Jan 22, 2016

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Jul 07, 2017

preview-icon 3 pages

, eeBoens jieifianueume oF APF court John E. Brehm, Jr. (0012550) Attorney for Defendant/Appeliant OHIO SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO Appeal No.: CA 23380 STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY Trial Court Case No.: 2007-CVE-008301 COMPANY, wus DEFENDANT/APPELLANT'S Plaintiff/Appellee, MEMORANDUM OPPOSING APPELLEE’S REQUEST FOR vs. LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE REPLY TO APPELLANT'S DAVID BECKHAM, REPLY BRIEF Defendant/Appellant. Appellee’s motion for leave to file a reply to app…

Case Filed

Mar 22, 2009

Case Status

OPEN

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Nov 23, 2009

Category

NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED

preview-icon 4 pages

Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2023 Mar 23 4:09 PM-23CV001960 0G317 - I6é FORM 26. CIVIL FEE WAIVER AFFIDAVIT AND ORDER FRANKLIN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS GENERAL DIVISION ae …

Case Filed

Mar 23, 2023

Case Status

ACTIVE

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

Mar 23, 2023

Judge Hon. ANDY D MILLER Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for ANDY D MILLER
preview-icon 4 pages

Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2023 Aug 22 9:54 AM-23CV005962 0G515 - N3 FORM 20. CIVIL FEE WAIVER AFFIDAVIT AND ORDER FRANKLIN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS GENERAL DIVISION Ladies Saiel …

Case Filed

Aug 22, 2023

Case Status

ACTIVE

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

Aug 22, 2023

Judge Hon. MARK A SERROTT Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for MARK A SERROTT
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope