Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
(A) The director of administrative services may assign exempt positions within state agencies, boards and commissions, paid by warrant of the director of budget and management, into the appropriate classification in the holding division of the classification plan. Allocations of positions to classifications within this division represent those positions that are currently overclassified.
(B) As the positions allocated to the classifications in this division become vacant, due to promotion, demotion, reassignment, separation, displacement, including layoff, or any other reason, the positions must be deleted, unless subordinate positions within the same holding class series are still encumbered.
(C) In the event of layoff or job abolishment, an employee reassigned into a holding classification shall have the right to displace in accordance with the provision of sections 124.321 to 124.328 of the Revised Code and Chapter 123:1-41 of the Administrative Code and into the classification series from which he or she was originally reassigned, provided the former classification has an equivalent or lower pay range. An employee who is in a holding classification at the time of layoff or job abolishment, and who cannot displace a position in his or her former classification because that former classification no longer exists, may displace another position which is in a classification deemed by the Department of Administrative Services to have replaced the former classification, provided that the position to be displaced is in a pay range which is equal to or lower than the pay range of the position in the holding classification. An employee who displaces another employee under this section must possess the minimum qualifications and, if applicable, any position specific minimum qualifications for the position to be displaced.
(D) An employee who is in a holding classification at the time of layoff or job abolishment may displace another employee in a holding classification, provided that the employee to be displaced has fewer retention points than the displacing employee, and provided that the employee to be displaced is in a position which is assigned to a holding classification have the same class number and same classification title as the displacing employee.
(E) In addition, an employee in a position which is not in a holding classification at the time of layoff or job abolishment may displace an employee in a holding classification, provided that: the displacing employee meets the minimum qualifications for the position; the position to be displaced is in a pay range equivalent to or lower than the pay range of the displacing employee; the position to be displaced is in the same classification grouping held by the displacing employee prior to the 1989-1990 classification modernization study; and the employee to be displaced has fewer retention points than the displacing employee.
(F) Once all positions of a given classification become vacant, the classification will be deleted from this rule. No new positions or future reclassifications of positions may be allocated to a classification within this division. The classifications assigned to this division of the classification plan appear herein:
PAY -RANGE CLASSIFICATION NUMBER DESCRIPTION 30000 EXEMPT HOLDING DIVISION 13 30233 Environmental Specialist 3 07 30607 Holding Class For Exempt Pay Range Seven 08 30608 Holding Class For Exempt Pay Range Eight 09 30609 Holding Class For Exempt Pay Range Nine 10 30610 Holding Class For Exempt Pay Range Ten 12 30612 Holding Class For Exempt Pay Range Twelve 13 30613 Holding Class For Exempt Pay Range Thirteen 14 30614 Holding Class For Exempt Pay Range Fourteen 15 30615 Holding Class For Exempt Pay Range Fifteen
E0836 ; G24 e | | | e BEFORE T.O.APRIL 2010 Approved _/<2_ ‘E0836 - G25 KEVIN R. DAVIS APPOINTING AUTHORITY INST SUPT 3 PN 20039738 Clarence V. Kirby Jr. MUI Facility Manager | Men Health Admin 3 PN 20039749 ‘Chart #1-3 Sane, Security, Heaith and Safety/MUI Unit Table of Organization Gallipolis Developmental Center£0836 G26 @ e@ AFTER T.O.JULY 2010 G27 e E0836 KEVIN R. DAVIS APPOINTING AUTHORITY INST SUPT 3 PN 20039738 …
OB507 - 197 Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2013 Dec 03 9:35 AM-12CV004331 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO Roger G. Yontz, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 12 CV 004331 Gregg Appliances, Inc., et al., Judge Patrick E, Sheeran Defendants. MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BENEFITS This Court should issue an Order, in limine, precluding any evidence or testimony at trial of unemployment compensation benefits received by Plaintiff …
E0943~- V6 . 1 e David A. Lahman, et al. 2 8 201022391 m > Gn) a) COURT OF COMMON PLEAS os FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO a ~~ o Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. successor by _{ Case No. 10CVE 05 08105 S merger to Wells Fargo Home i Aw Mortgage, Inc. i bad ! Judge Richard Frye Plaintiff i -Vs- MOTION TO REACTIVATE i PR IN Defendants Now comes the plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. successor by merger to Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., by and through its counsel, and hereby moves the Court to reactivate the…
(Ceiiincewany wor IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO cota CIVIL DIVISION Coit 22 Aes VINCENT KITT ve ) CASENO 720 Clarkson Ave - de, ) DAYTON, OH.45402 | CY. ohio ) 08 2 U 3 1 2 Plaintiff) : ) VERIFIED COMPLAINT -vs- ) FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF THE DAYTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS 115 S, LUDLOW STREET DAYTON, OHIO 45402 ) YVONNE V. ISAACS, PRESIDENT ) DAYTON BOARD OF EDUCATION 115 §. LUDLOW STREET DAYTON, OHIO 45402 PERCY MACK, SUPERINDENTENT DAYTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS ) 115 8, LU…
Feb 29, 2008
CLOSED
Montgomery County, OH
Feb 29, 2008
INJUNCTION
Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2012 Jul 17 2:00 PM-12CV004852 OA555 - C88 iN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO John T. Vickers : Appellant, x Case No. 12CV004852 Judge Sheward Ohio State Department : of Administrative Services Director : Appeliee, REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT JOHN T. VICKERS The Ohio State Department of Administrative Services (“DAS”) Director's denial of disability benefits for John T. Vickers is not supported by reliable, probat…
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.