Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
(A) Except as otherwise provided in this
rule, the authority may grant a tax credit pursuant to section 122.17 of the
Revised Code if the authority determines the business entity's project
satisfies all of the following:(1) The project
satisfies the requirements set forth in division (C) of section 122.17 of the
Revised Code;(2) The taxpayer
proposes as a result of the project to do all of the following by the metric
evaluation date:(a) Create at least ten full-time equivalent employees at the
project location;(b) Generate additional annual payroll at the project location in
an amount equal to or greater than one hundred seventy-five per cent of the
federal minimum wage at the time the authority approves the project, multiplied
by fifty-two thousand (which is the number of hours twenty-five full-time
equivalent employees would work in one year); and(c) Have an average hourly wage rate of at least one hundred
fifty per cent of the federal minimum wage at the time the authority approves
the project for all new employment positions added as a result of the
project.(3) The project has received a letter of
support from the chief executive, or his or her designee, of the local
political subdivision or a regional development agency charged with promoting
economic development with jurisdiction over the project location, or in the
case of a project with a to-be-determined project location, will receive such
letter prior to the approval of the subsequently identified project
location.(B) All or any portion of a project
determined to be retail shall not be eligible for tax credits pursuant to
section 122.17 of the Revised Code.(C) A taxpayer that sells or derives
revenue from the performance of services rather than the sale of goods, must
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the authority that at least fifty-one per
cent of the sales or revenues attributable to the proposed project are
projected to be generated from outside the state of Ohio by the metric
evaluation date to be eligible for tax credits pursuant to section 122.17 of
the Revised Code.(D) Each taxpayer shall certify to the
authority the amount of baseline payroll for individuals employed at the
project location as of the date of the job creation tax credit application is
submitted. Acceptance of tax credit award shall constitute the taxpayer's
confirmation that the amount of existing payroll certified to the authority is
accurate and will be relied upon by the authority in issuing tax credit
certificates. The tax credit shall be calculated on payroll attributed to
full-time equivalent employees employed by the taxpayer in excess of the
existing payroll, as accepted by the authority, provided that the taxpayer
executes and returns the tax credit agreement, within sixty days of delivery of
the agreement. If the taxpayer fails to execute the tax credit agreement within
such sixty day period, the tax credit may, at the discretion of the authority,
be calculated on payroll attributed to full-time equivalent employees employed
by the taxpayer in excess of the existing payroll, as of the date of the
execution of the tax credit agreement. The taxpayer shall include with any
agreement returned more than sixty days after delivery the amount of the
taxpayer's payroll at the project location not more than ten business days
prior to the date the taxpayer signs the agreement. Such payroll amount shall
be certified as accurate by the chief executive officer, chief financial
officer, or other officer authorized to sign tax returns for the
taxpayer.(E) The authority may from time to time
set additional eligibility requirements for job creation tax credit project
applications.(F) If the authority does not approve a
taxpayer's application in which it receives a recommendation under
division (C) of section 122.17 of the Revised Code, the Ohio development
services agency shall notify the taxpayer of such determination along with any
reasons for such determination identified by the authority. The taxpayer may be
eligible to reapply, unless otherwise determined by the authority.(G) By the metric evaluation date and
each year of the term thereafter, to remain eligible to receive a tax credit
certificate, the taxpayer must:(1) Maintain at least ten
new full-time equivalent employees at the project location;(2) Maintain an amount of
additional annual payroll consistent with paragraph (A)(2)(b) of this rule over
the baseline payroll; and(3) Maintain an average
hourly wage consistent with paragraph (A)(2)(c) of this rule.(H) If the taxpayer fails to satisfy the
requirements of paragraph (G) of rule 122:7-1-05 of the Administrative Code, no
tax certificate shall be issued for that year and the taxpayer may be subject
to remedial action as set forth in division (E) of section 122.17 of the
Revised Code.
(tian men IN THBCOUREOPCORMION PLEAS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO 9g AR-b PH 1:30 CIVIL DIVISION coesaR yA. BRUSH JENNIFER L. RG GWAEEOURTS MONTGOMERY CO. OHIO Plaintiff, Case No. 2007 8384 v. Judge Dennis J. Langer MARSHA RYAN, ADMINISTRATOR, Et al. BWC Claim No. 01-883235 Defendants. DEFENDANT MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC'S DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES Defendant Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Maxim Healthcare”) hereby submits the following as its disclosure of expert witnesses relative…
Oct 05, 2007
CLOSED
Montgomery County, OH
Apr 04, 2008
WORKER COMPENSATION
on “FILED IN THECOURT- Ol COMMON PLEAS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO PSMA) ane 3 CIVIL DIVISION ‘ ANIL: 10 JENNIFER J,:POUNDS,, a Hci ane agitts Plainti¢f, "#0 Case No. 2005 CV 09649 v. Judge Dennis J. Langer WILLIAM MABE, ADMINISTRATOR, BWC Claim No. 01-883235 SI Defendants. ANSWER OF DEFENDANT MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. Defendant, Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. ("Maxim"), in answer to the Complaint served upon it in this case, states as follows: 1. In answer to Paragraph 1 of the Compl…
Montgomery County, OH
Jan 31, 2006
WORKER COMPENSATION
E1575 — C28 SHERIFF'S RETURN OF ORDER OF SALE Aurora Loan Services LLC Plaintiff vs. Case No. [OCVEO8 12776 Andrew A Gregg et al Defendant Judge Sheward THE STATE OF OHIO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, ss} In obedience to the command of the Order of Sale hereto | did, on summon: 1. , 2. , 3. three disinterested freeholders, residents of said County, who were by me duly sworn to impartially appraise the lands and tenements therein described, upon actual view, and afterwards, on the date, said Appraiser…
#1406 - n14 COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO . § Robin A. Wright 8 Case No 10 CVH 12 18883 § Plaintiff § Judge Sheeran § c v. § . e 3 8 Bo Patsy J. Wright, et al. § = o § =. Delendants § 8 § cS _ wm PLAINTIFF ROBIN A. WRIGHT’S REPLY TO MEMORANDUM CONTRA QE DEFENDANTS PaTsy J. WRIGHT DECEASED, AND BRIAN WRIGHT, THE EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF PATSY J. WRIGHT TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The Court should grant Plaintiff Robin Wright summary judgment that 1) Patsy owed Ro…
Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2017 Jul 31 3:50 PM-17CV004641 0D731 - Y80 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO RIVER TRAIL FLATS LLC, CASE NO. 17 CV 004616 PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, VS. Judge Michael Holbrook OHIO DEVELOPMENT …
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.