Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 122:29-1-05 | Transformational Mixed Use Development Tax Credit.

                                                

(A) The tax credit certificate will be in
the form determined by the director and as approved by the director of
insurance.

(B) The amount of the tax credit
certificate is to be as calculated by the authority under either division (H)
or (I) of section 122.09 of the Revised Code, as applicable.

(C) In determining the increase in tax
collections under division (G) of section 122.09 of the Revised Code for a
calculation under division (H) of section 122.09 of the Revised Code, the
authority, with the information provided by the tax commissioner and applicable
municipal tax administrators will consider the following taxes, levies, and
charges, as each may be recognized by the tax commissioner and municipal tax
administrators from the project and within the surrounding area:

(1) Those collected under
Chapter 718. of the Revised Code;

(2) Those collected under
Chapter 5705. of the Revised Code;

(3) Those collected under
Chapter 5739. of the Revised Code, including section 5739.09;

(4) Those collected under
Chapter 5741. of the Revised Code; and

(5) Those collected under
Chapter 5747. of the Revised Code.

Increase in tax collections also includes any
amounts collected by a municipal or county tax administrator within the
surrounding area by an alternative method than the preceding named chapters of
the Revised Code such as tax increment financing agreements, payments in lieu
of taxes, and new community authority development charges.

(D) Any collection of taxes that have
been abated by action of the local jurisdiction or county are not to be
included by the authority in the computation of the increase in tax
collections.

(E) The property owner may request the
alternative method of computing the value of tax credit certificates under
division (I) of section 122.09 of the Revised Code on the request form made
available by the director, which will outline the necessary information for the
tax credit authority to make a determination on such request.

(1) In its request for
the alternative method of computing the value of tax credit certificates, the
property owner will identify at least one third party to be engaged by the
authority at the expense of the property owner who is competent to reasonably
confirm the expected increase in tax collections.

(2) Upon notification by
the authority to the property owner that the third party identified is
acceptable or its selection of a third party if more than one is identified,
the property owner may engage the selected third party on behalf of the
authority and, upon completion, present the third party report to the
authority.

(3) The third party
report as provided to the authority confirming the expected increase in tax
collections for the alternative method of computing the value of tax credit
certificates is public record under section 149.43 of the Revised Code except
as may be otherwise exempt.

(F) Pursuant to division (K) of section
122.09 of the Revised Code, the aggregate value of all tax credit certificates
issued for the project may not exceed (1) ten per cent of the actual
development costs of the project or (2) the sum of all estimated credit amounts
preliminarily approved by the tax credit authority in connection with the
project. In any event, no more than forty million dollars in tax credits may be
issued for the same transformational mixed use development.

(G) The tax credit may be sold or
transferred, in whole or in part, by the property owner under division (E) of
section 122.09 of the Revised Code. The property owner will notify the
authority of the transfer and will provide the information on the form
determined and provided by the director.

(H) A sale of property or sale of an
interest in real property by a property owner may include the right to the
amount of tax credit held by such property owner and is not a sale or transfer
of the credit for purposes of division (E) of section 122.09 of the Revised
Code.



Last updated July 6, 2021 at 1:29 PM


View Latest Documents

preview-icon 3 pages

(tian men IN THBCOUREOPCORMION PLEAS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO 9g AR-b PH 1:30 CIVIL DIVISION coesaR yA. BRUSH JENNIFER L. RG GWAEEOURTS MONTGOMERY CO. OHIO Plaintiff, Case No. 2007 8384 v. Judge Dennis J. Langer MARSHA RYAN, ADMINISTRATOR, Et al. BWC Claim No. 01-883235 Defendants. DEFENDANT MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC'S DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES Defendant Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Maxim Healthcare”) hereby submits the following as its disclosure of expert witnesses relative…

Case Filed

Oct 05, 2007

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Apr 04, 2008

Category

WORKER COMPENSATION

preview-icon 4 pages

on “FILED IN THECOURT- Ol COMMON PLEAS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO PSMA) ane 3 CIVIL DIVISION ‘ ANIL: 10 JENNIFER J,:POUNDS,, a Hci ane agitts Plainti¢f, "#0 Case No. 2005 CV 09649 v. Judge Dennis J. Langer WILLIAM MABE, ADMINISTRATOR, BWC Claim No. 01-883235 SI Defendants. ANSWER OF DEFENDANT MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. Defendant, Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. ("Maxim"), in answer to the Complaint served upon it in this case, states as follows: 1. In answer to Paragraph 1 of the Compl…

Case Filed

Dec 27, 2005

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Jan 31, 2006

Category

WORKER COMPENSATION

preview-icon 2 pages

E1575 — C28 SHERIFF'S RETURN OF ORDER OF SALE Aurora Loan Services LLC Plaintiff vs. Case No. [OCVEO8 12776 Andrew A Gregg et al Defendant Judge Sheward THE STATE OF OHIO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, ss} In obedience to the command of the Order of Sale hereto | did, on summon: 1. , 2. , 3. three disinterested freeholders, residents of said County, who were by me duly sworn to impartially appraise the lands and tenements therein described, upon actual view, and afterwards, on the date, said Appraiser…

Case Name 10 CV 012776
Case Filed

Aug 31, 2010

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

May 07, 2012

Judge Hon. DAVID C YOUNG Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for DAVID C YOUNG
preview-icon 4 pages

#1406 - n14 COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO . § Robin A. Wright 8 Case No 10 CVH 12 18883 § Plaintiff § Judge Sheeran § c v. § . e 3 8 Bo Patsy J. Wright, et al. § = o § =. Delendants § 8 § cS _ wm PLAINTIFF ROBIN A. WRIGHT’S REPLY TO MEMORANDUM CONTRA QE DEFENDANTS PaTsy J. WRIGHT DECEASED, AND BRIAN WRIGHT, THE EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF PATSY J. WRIGHT TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The Court should grant Plaintiff Robin Wright summary judgment that 1) Patsy owed Ro…

Case Name 10 CV 018883
Case Filed

Dec 29, 2010

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

Oct 31, 2011

Judge Hon. Jeffrey M. Brown Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Jeffrey M. Brown
preview-icon 12 pages

Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2017 Jul 31 3:50 PM-17CV004641 0D731 - Y80 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO RIVER TRAIL FLATS LLC, CASE NO. 17 CV 004616 PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, VS. Judge Michael Holbrook OHIO DEVELOPMENT …

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

Jul 31, 2017

Judge Hon. MICHAEL HOLBROOK Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for MICHAEL HOLBROOK
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope