Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 122:21-1-02 | Eligibility; application process.

                                                

(A) An applicant who is a corporation,
partnership, limited liability company, or other form or business entity must
be registered with the Ohio secretary of state to do business in
Ohio.

(B) Any application submitted must be
submitted on a form prescribed by the director and meet the requirements set
forth in division (B) of section 122.85 of the Revised Code and the budgetary
requirements of division (C) of section 122.85 of the Revised
Code.

(1) Documentation that shows the applicant has secured
funding equal to at least fifty per cent of the total estimated production
budget as required by division (B) of section 122.85 of the Revised Code can be
evidenced by any one or a combination of paragraphs (B)(1)(a) to (B)(1)(d) of
this rule.

(a) Private financing
documented by any one or more of the following:

(i) Term sheet signed by a financial institution or other
investment source declaring its total financial investment in the applicant
production, the date that the investment will be made, the term of the
investment and any condition for closing.

(ii) Executed loan agreement demonstrating a commitment to
loan a specific amount of financing for the applicant production, the date the
commitment was made and an established period in which the investment will take
place.

(iii) Commitment letter signed by a financial institution or
other investment source declaring its total financial investment in the
applicant production, the date the commitment was made and an established
period the investment will take place.

(b) Public financing
documented by an approved council or commission ordinance, development
agreement, letter of commitment or approval letter from a jurisdiction or
public agency that contains the dollar amount of financing for the applicant
production.

(c) Investor equity
documented by, at a minimum, a signed letter of commitment from the investor
containing the dollar amount committed and information from a financial
institution or third-party accountant demonstrating to the satisfaction of the
director the committed investor equity is unencumbered and available for the
applicant production.

(d) Other funding source
deemed to be acceptably documented by the director.

(2) Documentation of financial ability to undertake and
complete the production also includes submission of a planned outline for the
total funding of the production, which includes the expected sources of
funding, dollar amounts, and anticipated times for receipt of
funding.

(C) Eligible production expenditures are
as authorized by section 122.85 of the Revised Code, which does not include
alcoholic beverages. An applicant's eligible production expenditures may
not include the expenditures for the purchase of alcoholic
beverages.

(D) The application must include a
certification by the applicant that the production does not require records to
be maintained under 18 United States Code 2257 with respect to sexually
explicit content.

(E) The application process includes the
following steps:

(1) Applications are reviewed in two rounds each state
fiscal year, as required by division (C) of section 122.85 of the Revised
Code.

(a) For the first round
each state fiscal year, applications may be submitted April fifteenth through
June first.

(b) For the second round
each state fiscal year, applications may be submitted October fifteenth through
December first.

(2) Following the closing of the
application window for each round, the director will review applications for
completeness. If the information submitted in an application is materially
insufficient, requiring more than basic clarifications or supplemental
information to be evaluated and ranked, the director will notify the applicant
that its application will not be evaluated during that round. The applicant is
not restricted from applying again in subsequent rounds.

(3) Upon review of the
applications, the director may request clarification or supplemental
information about a production. The applicant must respond to the director by
June thirtieth for applications submitted in the first round of each state
fiscal year and by December thirty-first for applications submitted in the
second round of each state fiscal year. If an applicant fails to respond or
provide the requested information, the director may determine the
applicant's application insufficient for evaluation for tax credit
eligibility in that round. If the director determines an applicant's
application is insufficient for evaluation for tax credit eligibility, the
applicant is not restricted from reapplying for evaluation in subsequent
rounds.

(F) For each round the director scores
and ranks all completed applications based on the extent of positive economic
impact a production is likely to have in Ohio and the potential effect on
developing a permanent workforce in motion picture or theatrical production
industries in Ohio, in accordance with division (C) of section 122.85 of the
Revised Code.

(1) Economic impact is based on the applicants total
estimated eligible expenditures in Ohio directly associated with the
production.

(a) The application in
each round with the highest amount of total estimated eligible expenditures is
assigned a score of ten.

(b) All other
applications are given a score determined by calculating the total estimated
eligible expenditures in Ohio directly associated with the applicants
production divided by the highest estimated eligible expenditures for an
applicant production in that round and multiplying the resulting quotient by
ten. For example, in a round where the highest amount of estimated eligible
expenditures of all applicants is one million dollars and an applicants
estimated eligible expenditures is eight hundred fifty thousand dollars, the
applicant would receive a score of 8.5 for economic impact.

(2) The effect on developing a permanent workforce in the
motion picture or theatrical production industries is determined as
follows:

(a) first, by the number
of new jobs created.

(i) The number of new jobs created by an applicant project
is derived by calculating the quotient resulting from the total estimated hours
for which a wage greater than one and one half times the federal minimum wage
will be paid to Ohio residents in the production divided by two-thousand
eighty.

(ii) The application with the highest number of new jobs
created in a round is given a score of five. All other applications are given
the score calculated by dividing the number of new jobs created by the project
by the highest number of new jobs created for applications in the round and
multiplying the resulting quotient by five. For example, if an applicant
project has twenty-five new jobs created and the project with highest amount of
new jobs created in that round is one hundred, the applicant project receives a
score of 1.25 for new jobs.

(b) Second, by the amount
of eligible payroll added by employees in Ohio. For purposes of this section,
eligible payroll means the estimated amount of compensation used to determine
the withholding obligations in division (A) of section 5747.06 of the Revised
Code and estimated to be paid by the applicant during the production to an
employee of the production who is a resident of Ohio or an employee who is not
a resident of Ohio and whose compensation is not exempt from the tax imposed
under section 5747.02 of the Revised Code pursuant to a reciprocity agreement
with another state under division (A)(3) of section 5747.05 of the Revised
Code.

The applicant project with the highest amount of estimated
total eligible payroll expenditures is given a score of five. All other
applicants are given the score calculated by dividing the applicant project
total eligible payroll by the highest amount of total eligible payroll for a
project for the round and multiplying the resulting quotient by five. For
example, if an applicant project has three hundred thousand dollars of total
eligible payroll and the highest amount of total eligible payroll for a project
in that round is one million dollars the applicant project is given a score of
1.5 for eligible payroll added by employees in Ohio.

(3) Starting with television series and then all other
production types, the director ranks all applicants in each round by
calculating the sum of the scores derived for positive economic impact and
effect on developing a permanent workforce in motion picture or theatrical
production industries in Ohio from highest to lowest in accordance with
division (C) of section 122.85 of the Revised Code. The director finds
applicants eligible for Ohio motion picture tax credit in descending order
until the amount of funds available for allocation in that round have either
been exhausted or are insufficient to allocate credits for the total estimated
tax credit amount for the next highest ranked project in that round, as
determined by the director.

(G) The director will send notice of eligibility for motion
picture tax credit by the following dates:

(1) July thirty first for the first round of each state
fiscal year; and,

(2) January thirty first for the second round of each
fiscal year.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 3 pages

(tian men IN THBCOUREOPCORMION PLEAS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO 9g AR-b PH 1:30 CIVIL DIVISION coesaR yA. BRUSH JENNIFER L. RG GWAEEOURTS MONTGOMERY CO. OHIO Plaintiff, Case No. 2007 8384 v. Judge Dennis J. Langer MARSHA RYAN, ADMINISTRATOR, Et al. BWC Claim No. 01-883235 Defendants. DEFENDANT MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC'S DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES Defendant Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Maxim Healthcare”) hereby submits the following as its disclosure of expert witnesses relative…

Case Filed

Oct 05, 2007

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Apr 04, 2008

Category

WORKER COMPENSATION

preview-icon 4 pages

on “FILED IN THECOURT- Ol COMMON PLEAS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO PSMA) ane 3 CIVIL DIVISION ‘ ANIL: 10 JENNIFER J,:POUNDS,, a Hci ane agitts Plainti¢f, "#0 Case No. 2005 CV 09649 v. Judge Dennis J. Langer WILLIAM MABE, ADMINISTRATOR, BWC Claim No. 01-883235 SI Defendants. ANSWER OF DEFENDANT MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. Defendant, Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. ("Maxim"), in answer to the Complaint served upon it in this case, states as follows: 1. In answer to Paragraph 1 of the Compl…

Case Filed

Dec 27, 2005

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Jan 31, 2006

Category

WORKER COMPENSATION

preview-icon 2 pages

E1575 — C28 SHERIFF'S RETURN OF ORDER OF SALE Aurora Loan Services LLC Plaintiff vs. Case No. [OCVEO8 12776 Andrew A Gregg et al Defendant Judge Sheward THE STATE OF OHIO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, ss} In obedience to the command of the Order of Sale hereto | did, on summon: 1. , 2. , 3. three disinterested freeholders, residents of said County, who were by me duly sworn to impartially appraise the lands and tenements therein described, upon actual view, and afterwards, on the date, said Appraiser…

Case Name 10 CV 012776
Case Filed

Aug 31, 2010

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

May 07, 2012

Judge Hon. DAVID C YOUNG Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for DAVID C YOUNG
preview-icon 4 pages

#1406 - n14 COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO . § Robin A. Wright 8 Case No 10 CVH 12 18883 § Plaintiff § Judge Sheeran § c v. § . e 3 8 Bo Patsy J. Wright, et al. § = o § =. Delendants § 8 § cS _ wm PLAINTIFF ROBIN A. WRIGHT’S REPLY TO MEMORANDUM CONTRA QE DEFENDANTS PaTsy J. WRIGHT DECEASED, AND BRIAN WRIGHT, THE EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF PATSY J. WRIGHT TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The Court should grant Plaintiff Robin Wright summary judgment that 1) Patsy owed Ro…

Case Name 10 CV 018883
Case Filed

Dec 29, 2010

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

Oct 31, 2011

Judge Hon. Jeffrey M. Brown Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Jeffrey M. Brown
preview-icon 12 pages

Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2017 Jul 31 3:50 PM-17CV004641 0D731 - Y80 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO RIVER TRAIL FLATS LLC, CASE NO. 17 CV 004616 PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, VS. Judge Michael Holbrook OHIO DEVELOPMENT …

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

Jul 31, 2017

Judge Hon. MICHAEL HOLBROOK Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for MICHAEL HOLBROOK
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope