Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
Capitalized terms used in rules 122:19-1-01 to 122:19-1-08 shall have the following meaning:
(A) "Amendment" means any modification to the project, as described in an approved application including, but not limited to, changes in applicant, scope of the project, timeline for completion, changes in financing, the rehabilitation activities or end use.
(B) "Applicant" means the owner or qualified lessee of a historic building.
(C) "Application period" means the time period established in the program policies for which an application for a historic preservation tax credit may be submitted by the applicant and reveiwed by the director.
(D) "Applicable rehabilitation standards" means the secretary of the interior's standards for rehabilitation prescribed under 16 U.S.C. 470, et seq., dated October 15, 1966 as amended, and 36 C.F.R. 67.7, dated February 26, 1990.
(E) "Detailed scoring criteria" means the attributes of historic preservation projects that are identified in the program policies employed to evaluate historic preservation tax credit for the appropriateness of tax credit assistance including, but not limited to, such measures as the potential economic impact of the project and regional distributive balance of the credits throughout the state of Ohio.
(F) "Director" means the director of the development services agency of the state of Ohio.
(G) "High qualified rehabilitation expenditure application" means an application submitted for a historic preservation tax credit with estimated qualified rehabilitation expenditures above the average of the prior five calendar years rehabilitation costs of all federal historic preservation tax credit investment projects certified in the state of Ohio.
(H) "Low qualified rehabilitation expenditure application" means an application submitted for a historic preservation tax credit with estimated qualified rehabilitation expenditures at or less than the average of the prior five calendar years rehabilitation costs of all federal historic preservation tax credit investment projects certified in the state of Ohio.
(I) "Major factor" means the tax credits are essential in the decision to rehabilitate the historic building or substantially increase the investment made by the applicant in the project.
(J) "Officer" or "State Historic Preservation Officer" means the state historic preservation officer appointed by the governor under 16 U.S.C 470a, dated May 26, 2000.
(K) "Program policies" means the detailed guidelines for the Ohio historic preservation tax credit program approved by the director.
(L) "Project" means the activities to be undertaken and costs identified as part of an application submitted for a historic preservation tax credit. The activities and costs include both qualified rehabilitation expenditures as defined in division (A)(2) of section 149.311 of the Revised Code and other rehabilitation costs that do not satisfy the definition of qualified rehabilitation expenditures identified in connection with the rehabilitation of a historic building. Consistent with federal regulation 36 C.F.R. 67, dated February 26, 1990, a project may include more than one building, such as an industrial or agricultural complex, provided there is historical evidence that the buildings functioned together during their time period of significance to serve an overall purpose. Row houses that were designed and constructed as a single building or complex shall be considered a single project provided the applicant owns each building included in the application. A project may include more than one historic building if the historic buildings are in close proximity and rehabilitation activities and costs undertaken by the same applicant under the same rehabilitation period. Each historic building in a multiple building project is subject to the eligibility requirements of a single historic building.
(M) "Tax commissioner" means the commissioner of the department of taxation of the state of Ohio.
(tian men IN THBCOUREOPCORMION PLEAS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO 9g AR-b PH 1:30 CIVIL DIVISION coesaR yA. BRUSH JENNIFER L. RG GWAEEOURTS MONTGOMERY CO. OHIO Plaintiff, Case No. 2007 8384 v. Judge Dennis J. Langer MARSHA RYAN, ADMINISTRATOR, Et al. BWC Claim No. 01-883235 Defendants. DEFENDANT MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC'S DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES Defendant Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Maxim Healthcare”) hereby submits the following as its disclosure of expert witnesses relative…
Oct 05, 2007
CLOSED
Montgomery County, OH
Apr 04, 2008
WORKER COMPENSATION
on “FILED IN THECOURT- Ol COMMON PLEAS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO PSMA) ane 3 CIVIL DIVISION ‘ ANIL: 10 JENNIFER J,:POUNDS,, a Hci ane agitts Plainti¢f, "#0 Case No. 2005 CV 09649 v. Judge Dennis J. Langer WILLIAM MABE, ADMINISTRATOR, BWC Claim No. 01-883235 SI Defendants. ANSWER OF DEFENDANT MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. Defendant, Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. ("Maxim"), in answer to the Complaint served upon it in this case, states as follows: 1. In answer to Paragraph 1 of the Compl…
Montgomery County, OH
Jan 31, 2006
WORKER COMPENSATION
E1575 — C28 SHERIFF'S RETURN OF ORDER OF SALE Aurora Loan Services LLC Plaintiff vs. Case No. [OCVEO8 12776 Andrew A Gregg et al Defendant Judge Sheward THE STATE OF OHIO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, ss} In obedience to the command of the Order of Sale hereto | did, on summon: 1. , 2. , 3. three disinterested freeholders, residents of said County, who were by me duly sworn to impartially appraise the lands and tenements therein described, upon actual view, and afterwards, on the date, said Appraiser…
#1406 - n14 COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO . § Robin A. Wright 8 Case No 10 CVH 12 18883 § Plaintiff § Judge Sheeran § c v. § . e 3 8 Bo Patsy J. Wright, et al. § = o § =. Delendants § 8 § cS _ wm PLAINTIFF ROBIN A. WRIGHT’S REPLY TO MEMORANDUM CONTRA QE DEFENDANTS PaTsy J. WRIGHT DECEASED, AND BRIAN WRIGHT, THE EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF PATSY J. WRIGHT TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The Court should grant Plaintiff Robin Wright summary judgment that 1) Patsy owed Ro…
Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2017 Jul 31 3:50 PM-17CV004641 0D731 - Y80 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO RIVER TRAIL FLATS LLC, CASE NO. 17 CV 004616 PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, VS. Judge Michael Holbrook OHIO DEVELOPMENT …
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.