(A) The commission may refer for settlement or compromise any complaint or charge pending before the commission or appropriate prosecuting authority. The commission will consult with the respondent, complainant and any other person the commission or the prosecuting authority considers necessary regarding the settlement referral.
(B) The commission may require the complainant to file a sworn affidavit with the commission setting forth the facts or allegations that the complainant requests the commission to consider during settlement negotiations. The complainant must serve a copy of the sworn affidavit on all parties. The commission may also require the respondent to file a sworn affidavit in response to the complainant's allegations within sixty days of the filing of complainant's affidavit with the commission.
(C) In determining whether a matter will be referred for settlement, the commission will assess the appropriateness of the referral. The commission may consider factors it deems relevant in making its assessment, including, but not limited to, the following factors:
(1) Severity of the alleged conduct including the dollar value involved in the alleged offense;
(2) Whether the alleged conduct is an isolated event or part of a repeated pattern of conduct;
(3) Whether the alleged conduct appears to indicate violations of other state or federal criminal laws;
(4) Complexity of issues or evidence alleged in the complaint or charge;
(5) Involvement of other appropriate agencies in the investigation of the respondent's conduct;
(6) Existence of commission precedent concerning the alleged or similar conduct;
(7) Prior contact of the respondent with the commission;
(8) Scope of investigation necessary to gather information;
(9) Age of the facts alleged in the complaint;
(10) Resources of the commission;
(11) Whether the respondent self-reported the potential violation; and
(12) Any other mitigating circumstances.
Jul 07, 2006
Closed
Montgomery County
Montgomery County, OH
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL
Administrative
Admin Appeals
Rule 102-11-02 | Settlement negotiations.
36 pages
. etioon a ! IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION MARK S. PAXSON * Case No. 2006 CV 05182 * Appellant * JUDGE G. Jack Davis * vs, * REPLY MEMORANDUM * IN SUPPORT OF IMMEDIATE CITY OF DAYTON * DECLARATION OF Appellee. * UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF * MUNICIPAL CHARTER SECTION 102 * The City of Dayton has belatedly offered arguments in defense of Municipal Charter Section 102, the residency requirement for Dayton City Civil Service employees. The City offers these argu…
Jul 07, 2006
CLOSED
Montgomery County, OH
Feb 09, 2007
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL
9 pages
yi wu | i IN THE COMIMON:PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO ’ ~ "GENERAL DIVISION MARK S. PAXSON : CASE NO. 06 CV 05182 Judge Davis Plaintiff - Appellant, v. : MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR CITY OF DAYTON, OHIO : IMMEDIATE DECLARATION OF THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF Defendant - Appellee. : CITY OF DAYTON CHARTER SECTION 102 Appellee City of Dayton (“City”) hereby opposes Appellant's (“Paxson”) motion to declare Charter Section 102 unconstitutional. I. PROCEDURA…
Jul 07, 2006
CLOSED
Montgomery County, OH
Feb 02, 2007
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL
27 pages
a @ . (fii una ' IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION MARK S. PAXSON * Case No. 2006 CV 05182 * Appellant * JUDGE G. Jack Davis * vs. * * * CITY OF DAYTON * Appellee. * ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT & MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE DECLARATION OF THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF CITY OF DAYTON CHARTER SECTION 102 Dwight D. Brannon (0021657) Todd Allin Morman (0076658) BRANNON & ASSOCIATES 130 W. Second St. Suite 900 Dayton, OH 45402 Telephone: (937) 228-2306 Facs…
Jul 07, 2006
CLOSED
Montgomery County, OH
Jan 05, 2007
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL
2 pages
QUAN LT Pi 3: 98 o 9 WNNED IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO GENERAL DIVISION MARK S. PAXSON : CASE NO. 06 CV 05182 Judge Davis Plaintiff - Appellant, v. : APPELLEE’S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY CITY OF DAYTON, OHIO : TO APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE DECLARATION OF THE Defendant - Appellee. : UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF CITY OF DAYTON CHARTER SECTION 102 Appellee City of Dayton respectfully requests a two week extension to file its memorandum in oppositio…
Jul 07, 2006
CLOSED
Montgomery County, OH
Jan 17, 2007
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL
16 pages
(iiitonanin . MARK PAXSON, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF DAYTON, OHIO, Defendant/Appellee. “LI. Ohig IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION Case No. 2006 CV 5182 Judge Mary Wiseman DECISION, ORDER AND ENTRY DENYING APPELLANT’S ADMINSITRATIVE APPEAL DECISION, ORDER AND ENTRY DENYING APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE DECLARATION OF THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF CITY OF : DAYTON CHARTER SECTION 102 FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER This matter comes before the Court …
Jul 07, 2006
CLOSED
Montgomery County, OH
Jul 18, 2008
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
Your content views addon has successfully been added.
No Worries!
Adding your team is easy
in the "Manage Company Users" tab
