Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
§ 7:27-21.6. Methods to be used for quantifying actual emissions
(a) The method used for quantifying actual emissions for use in preparing emission information required at 7:27-21.5(e) shall be determined as follows:
1. If a permit or certificate issued by the Department pursuant to N.J.A.C. 7:27-8 or 22 specifies a method for quantifying actual emissions of a given air contaminant, then that method shall be used; and
2. For all other cases, the method that shall be used is the best available quantification method selected from Table 3 below. The best available quantification method is a method listed in Table 3 that is reasonably available, as defined at 7:27-21.1, and provides the most accurate estimation of the actual emissions from the source operation. An owner or operator submitting an Emission Statement shall presume that the highest-ranked method in Table 3, which is also reasonably available, is the best available quantification method and use that method, unless a different method is selected pursuant to (b) below.
TABLE 3 | |
RANKING OF METHODS | |
FOR QUANTIFYING ACTUAL EMISSIONS | |
Rank | Method |
1 | Continuous Emissions Monitoring |
2 | Predictive Emissions Monitoring |
3 | Department Approved and Supervised Source Emission Testing |
Performed during the Reporting Year | |
4 | Department Approved and Supervised Source Emission Testing |
Performed in a Prior Year | |
5 | Mass/Material Balance |
6 | AP-42 Emission Factor or Other EPA-Approved Emission Estimation |
Methodology (for example, TANKS4 and WATER9) or Selection of a | |
Source Emission Test for a Similar Size Unit from the AP-42 Basis | |
and Background Documents | |
7 | Manufacturer's Estimate |
8 | Others (including): |
Industry Council or Organization Emission Factor | |
--Source Emission Testing Not Approved or Supervised by the | |
Department | |
--Good Engineering Judgement/Factor |
(b) A method listed in Table 3, which is ranked lower than the highest-ranked reasonably available method, may be used to quantify actual emissions for an Emission Statement if any of the following conditions are met:
1. The owner or operator can demonstrate that use of the lower-ranked method results in more accurate quantification of emissions than what would have been achieved using any higher-ranked method that is reasonably available; or
2. Use of the lower-ranked method is consistent with EPA's guidance, including its hierarchy for emission calculation methods and/or its identification of preferred methods for specific types of source operations, as set forth in the most current version of EPA's Emissions Inventory Improvement Program Guidance Document.
(c) For each emissions calculation method used in an Emission Statement which is a lower-ranked method being used pursuant to (b) above, a written justification shall be prepared documenting the basis for the use of the lower-ranked method. This justification shall be maintained on-site and be provided upon request to the Department. It shall include:
1. Identification of the quantification method that was the highest-ranked reasonably available method pursuant to the rankings in Table 3;
2. Identification of the method selected by the owner or operator pursuant to (b) above; and
3. An explanation of how selection of this method conforms with the applicable condition(s) in (b) above.
(New Rule by R.2003 d.86, effective February 18, 2003 (operative March 24, 2003).UNN-L-003354-19 09/10/2020 6:55:12 AM Pg 1 of 1 Trans ID: LCV20201591330 Court Plaza North 25 Main Street …
CAM-L-001221-24 04/18/2024 4:39:33 PM Pglof5 Trans ID: LCV20241002495 Matthew R. McCrink, Esquire New Jersey Bar Identification No.: 285601972 McCRINK, KEHLER & McCRINK 475 Route 73 North West Berlin, New Jersey 08091 Telephone: (856) 768-0033 Facsimile: (856) 768-8844 Attorneys for Plaintiff(s), Michael A. Micciche and Anthony P. Micciche SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY MICHAEL A. MICCICHE and ANTHONY …
Apr 18, 2024
Active
MON-L-000470-23 05/02/2023 10:07:24 AM Pg 1 of 14 Trans ID: LCV20231429320 May 2, 2023 Via eCourts Honorable David F. Bauman, J.S.C. Superior Court of New Jersey Monmouth County Courthouse 71 Monument Park Freehold, New Jersey 07728 Re: Lenscoat, LLC v. Scott Elowitz Photography, LLC Docket No.: MON-L-470-23 Dear Judge Bauman: We represent Plaintiff Lenscoat, LLC (“Plaintiff”) in the above styled matter…
(No Case Name Available)
MON-L-000470-23 05/02/2023 10:07:24 AM Pg 1 of 14 Trans ID: LCV20231429320 May 2, 2023 Via eCourts Honorable David F. Bauman, J.S.C. Superior Court of New Jersey Monmouth County Courthouse 71 Monument Park Freehold, New Jersey 07728 Re: Lenscoat, LLC v. Scott Elowitz Photography, LLC Docket No.: MON-L-470-23 Dear Judge Bauman: We represent Plaintiff Lenscoat, LLC (“Plaintiff”) in the above styled matter…
UNN-L-003967-14 11/30/2018 12:08:53 PM Pg 1 of5 Trans ID: LCV20182076998 ZARWIN * BAUM * DEVITO KAPLAN * SCHAER * TODDY °¢ P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW RONALD N, LEBOVITS Member PA, NJ & CA BARS rlebovits@z…
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.