New Jersey Administrative Code|Section 7:13-5.5 - When a verification is required for issuance of an authorization under a general permit or an individual permit

                                                

§ 7:13-5.5. When a verification is required for issuance of an authorization under a general permit or an individual permit

(a) Except as provided at (b) and (c) below, the flood hazard area design flood elevation, and floodway limit, where present, must be known and verified within the project area pursuant to N.J.A.C. 7:13-5.2 in order for the Department to determine compliance with the requirements of this chapter and issue an authorization under a general permit or an individual permit. An applicant for an authorization under a general permit or an individual permit shall therefore demonstrate that:

1. The applicant possesses a valid verification of the flood hazard area design flood elevation, and also the floodway limit, if present, for the project area;

2. The applicant has applied for a verification of the flood hazard area design flood elevation, and also the floodway limit, where present, for the project area, and the Department subsequently approves the verification either prior to or concurrent with the issuance of the authorization under a general permit or individual permit;

3. The project meets the conditions of (b)1, 2, or 3 below, in which case no verification is required in order to obtain an authorization under a general permit or an individual permit; or

4. The project meets the conditions of (c) below, in which case a verification of only the flood hazard area design flood elevation is required either prior to or concurrent with the issuance of an authorization under a general permit or an individual permit.

(b) Obtaining a verification is not required prior to the issuance of an authorization under a general permit or an individual permit, provided the Department determines, based on a visual inspection of submitted site plans and without a review of calculations, that one or more of the following requirements is satisfied:

1. No fill or aboveground structure is proposed within a flood hazard area;

2. The project consists solely of the construction, replacement, enlargement, repair, or removal of a bridge or culvert along a railroad or public roadway; or

3. All of the following are true:

i. No habitable building, railroad, roadway, or parking area is proposed, which requires knowledge of the flood hazard area design flood elevation to determine compliance with this chapter;

ii. Any proposed fill and/or aboveground structure is located outside a floodway; and

iii. The flood storage displacement requirements of 7:13-11.4are satisfied.

(c) Obtaining a verification of only the flood hazard area design flood elevation and not the floodway limit is required prior to the issuance of an authorization under a general permit or an individual permit, provided the Department determines, based on a visual inspection of submitted site plans and without a review of calculations, that the following requirements are satisfied:

1. No fill or aboveground structure is proposed within a floodway; and

2. Compliance with the flood storage displacement requirements of 7:13-11.4does not require knowledge of the location of the floodway.

(Adopted by 48 N.J.R. 1067(a), effective June 20, 2016)

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 1 page

UNN-L-003354-19 09/10/2020 6:55:12 AM Pg 1 of 1 Trans ID: LCV20201591330 Court Plaza North 25 Main Street …

Case Filed

Sep 24, 2019

Case Status

Active

County

Union County, NJ

Filed Date

Sep 10, 2020

Judge Hon. Thomas J Walsh Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Thomas J Walsh
preview-icon 5 pages

CAM-L-001221-24 04/18/2024 4:39:33 PM Pglof5 Trans ID: LCV20241002495 Matthew R. McCrink, Esquire New Jersey Bar Identification No.: 285601972 McCRINK, KEHLER & McCRINK 475 Route 73 North West Berlin, New Jersey 08091 Telephone: (856) 768-0033 Facsimile: (856) 768-8844 Attorneys for Plaintiff(s), Michael A. Micciche and Anthony P. Micciche SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY MICHAEL A. MICCICHE and ANTHONY …

Case Filed

Apr 18, 2024

Case Status

Active

County

Camden County, NJ

Filed Date

Apr 18, 2024

Judge Hon. Steven J Polansky Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Steven J Polansky
preview-icon 2 pages

MID L 000466-16 03/18/2016 Pg 1 of 2 Trans ID: LCV20192242986 FILED RAYMOND L. DADEMO, ESQ. MAR 18 2016 119 Chambers Bridge Road Judge Vincent LeBlon Brick, NJ. 08723 Tel — 732-920-0001; Fax — 732-920-1569 Attorney for Plaintiff, Shah …

Case Filed

Jan 22, 2016

Case Status

Closed

County

Middlesex County, NJ

Filed Date

Mar 18, 2016

Judge Hon. Jamie D Happas Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Jamie D Happas
preview-icon 4 pages

MON-L-000470-23 05/02/2023 10:07:24 AM Pg 1 of 14 Trans ID: LCV20231429320 May 2, 2023 Via eCourts Honorable David F. Bauman, J.S.C. Superior Court of New Jersey Monmouth County Courthouse 71 Monument Park Freehold, New Jersey 07728 Re: Lenscoat, LLC v. Scott Elowitz Photography, LLC Docket No.: MON-L-470-23 Dear Judge Bauman: We represent Plaintiff Lenscoat, LLC (“Plaintiff”) in the above styled matter…

Case Name

(No Case Name Available)

preview-icon 14 pages

MON-L-000470-23 05/02/2023 10:07:24 AM Pg 1 of 14 Trans ID: LCV20231429320 May 2, 2023 Via eCourts Honorable David F. Bauman, J.S.C. Superior Court of New Jersey Monmouth County Courthouse 71 Monument Park Freehold, New Jersey 07728 Re: Lenscoat, LLC v. Scott Elowitz Photography, LLC Docket No.: MON-L-470-23 Dear Judge Bauman: We represent Plaintiff Lenscoat, LLC (“Plaintiff”) in the above styled matter…

Case Filed

Feb 15, 2023

Case Status

Active

County

Monmouth County, NJ

Filed Date

May 02, 2023

Judge Hon. DAVID F BAUMAN Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for DAVID F BAUMAN
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope