New Jersey Administrative Code|Section 6A:33-2.1 - Schools identified as Priority or Focus

                                                

§ 6A:33-2.1. Schools identified as Priority or Focus

(a) The bottom five percent of Title I schools, that is, those schools that receive Federal funding pursuant to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, reauthorized as the Elementary and Secondary Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C. §§6301 et seq., that meet the criteria noted in (a)1, 2, or 3 below shall be designated by the Department as Priority Schools, with the exception of schools with a median Student Growth Percentile (SGP) of 65 or higher, or high schools with average yearly increases greater than five percentage points in High School Proficiency Assessment (HSPA) proficiency rates:

1. All current or formally designated Tier I or Tier II schools under the school improvement grant (SIG) program that are using SIG funds to implement a school intervention model;

2. All schools qualifying for Federal funds pursuant to Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Act of 1965 with the lowest absolute levels of proficiency as measured on State assessments; or

3. Any non-Title I school ranking below the highest ranked Title I school and that meets the criteria noted in (a)1 or 2 above.

(b) The bottom 10 percent of Title I schools that are not categorized as Priority Schools and meet one or more of the following criteria shall be designated by the Department as Focus Schools:

1. All Title I-eligible or -participating high schools not previously identified as a Priority School and with a graduation rate of less than 75 percent;

2. All schools with the largest within-school proficiency gap between the highest-performing subgroup and the average proficiency of the two lowest-performing subgroups. Only subgroups that contain at least 30 students, represent at least five percent of the total student population, and have a SGP score below 65 shall be included;

3. All schools with their two lowest-performing subgroups ranking among the lowest combined proficiency rates in the State. Only subgroups that contain at least 30 students, represent at least five percent of the total student population, and have a SGP score below 65 shall be included; or

4. Any non-Title I school ranking below the highest-ranked Title I school that meets the criteria noted in (b)1, 2, or 3 above.

(c) The State assessments data, graduation rates, and median SGPs used to determine Priority and Focus School designation shall be based on the 2008-2009, 2009-2010, and 2010-2011 school years.

(d) A school becomes eligible to exit status as a Priority School only if it meets the following criteria:

1. Fails to meet the definition of a Priority School for two consecutive years after implementation of a SIP;

2. Successfully implements all interventions required through the QSR, as determined by the RAC; and

3. Reduces by 25 percent the number of students not demonstrating proficiency on Statewide assessments over a three-year period after implementation of the SIP. A high school shall have reduced by 25 percent the number of students not graduating over a three-year period after implementation of the SIP; and/or demonstrated high growth for two consecutive years after SIP implementation, as measured by a SGP score of 65 or higher.

(e) A school becomes eligible to exit status as a Focus School only if meets the following criteria:

1. Fails to meet the definition of a Focus School for two consecutive years after implementation of the SIP;

2. Successfully implements all interventions required through the QSR, as determined by the RAC;

3. Meets over a three-year period annual measurable objectives for its lowest-performing subgroups if status was based on proficiency rates of the two lowest-performing subgroups; and/or demonstrates high growth for two consecutive years after implementation of the SIP, as measured by SGP of 65 or higher; or

4. Reduces by 25 percent the number of students not graduating over a three year period after implementation of the SIP if the high school's status was based on graduation rates.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 4 pages

or V=1] Ned i fs (0) B= [=] = 01.4 LNs eC i IN Colicg i A ET allate|elape oom PM ie) NTS Gaye BAW) SEAN D. DIAS | Partner sdias@sh-law.com July 24, 2017 Via Electronic Filing and Overnight Mail Honorable Jeffrey R. Jablonski, J.S.C. Hudson County Superior Court Hudson County Administration Building …

Case Filed

Jun 09, 2017

Case Status

Closed

County

Hudson County, NJ

Filed Date

Jul 24, 2017

Judge Hon. Jeffrey R Jablonski Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Jeffrey R Jablonski
preview-icon 3 pages

BUR-L-001339-16 01/31/2020 3:52:58 PM Pg 1 of 3 Trans ID: LCV2020221659 Daniel J. DeFiglio Also Member of Pennsylvania Bar …

Case Filed

Jun 22, 2016

Case Status

Closed

County

Burlington County, NJ

Filed Date

Jan 31, 2020

Judge Hon. John E Harrington Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for John E Harrington
preview-icon 3 pages

MER L 002159-08 11/18/2020 Pg 1 of 3 Trans ID: LCV20202098298 FRECEN FED/PAID cor THIS Re LL BE SEI DON JAN 85 “209 A LL PA AT! …

Case Filed

Aug 28, 2008

Case Status

Closed

County

Mercer County, NJ

Filed Date

Nov 18, 2020

preview-icon 4 pages

BUR-L-000653-16 11/14/2017 8:07:01 PM Pg 1 of 4 Trans ID: LCV2017474953 Michael K. Willison 856-354-0192 Attorney at Law Fax: 888-811-7144 Admitted in NJ, PA mwillison@dmclaw.com …

Case Filed

Mar 18, 2016

Case Status

Closed

County

Burlington County, NJ

Filed Date

Nov 14, 2017

Judge Hon. John E Harrington Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for John E Harrington
preview-icon 10 pages

MRS-L-002098-20 10/16/2020 7:31:08 AM Pg 1 of 3 Trans ID: LCV20201840425 BRESSLER~DUYK LAW FIRM Marc J. Bressler, Esq. Attorney ID: 225221967 David S. Bressler, Esq. Attorney ID: 021191993 1200 Route 22 East, Suite 2000 Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807 Tel: 732-494-8555 Fax: 732-494-9464 collection@bresslerlaw.com Our file # 31953 Attorney for Plaintiff(s) Capital Forest Products, Inc. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY MORRIS COUNTY …

Case Filed

Oct 16, 2020

Case Status

Defaulted

County

Morris County, NJ

Filed Date

Oct 16, 2020

Judge Hon. Peter A Bogaard Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Peter A Bogaard
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope