Florida Statutes|Section 681.104

                                                

681.104 Nonconformity of motor vehicles.

(1)(a) After three attempts have been made to repair the same nonconformity, the consumer shall give written notification, by registered or express mail to the manufacturer, of the need to repair the nonconformity to allow the manufacturer a final attempt to cure the nonconformity. The manufacturer shall have 10 days, commencing upon receipt of such notification, to respond and give the consumer the opportunity to have the motor vehicle repaired at a reasonably accessible repair facility within a reasonable time after the consumer’s receipt of the response. The manufacturer shall have 10 days, except in the case of a recreational vehicle, in which event the manufacturer shall have 45 days, commencing upon the delivery of the motor vehicle to the designated repair facility by the consumer, to conform the motor vehicle to the warranty. If the manufacturer fails to respond to the consumer and give the consumer the opportunity to have the motor vehicle repaired at a reasonably accessible repair facility or perform the repairs within the time periods prescribed in this subsection, the requirement that the manufacturer be given a final attempt to cure the nonconformity does not apply.
(b) If the motor vehicle is out of service by reason of repair of one or more nonconformities by the manufacturer or its authorized service agent for a cumulative total of 15 or more days, exclusive of downtime for routine maintenance prescribed by the owner’s manual, the consumer shall so notify the manufacturer in writing by registered or express mail to give the manufacturer or its authorized service agent an opportunity to inspect or repair the vehicle.
(2)(a) If the manufacturer, or its authorized service agent, cannot conform the motor vehicle to the warranty by repairing or correcting any nonconformity after a reasonable number of attempts, the manufacturer, within 40 days, shall repurchase the motor vehicle and refund the full purchase price to the consumer, less a reasonable offset for use, or, in consideration of its receipt of payment from the consumer of a reasonable offset for use, replace the motor vehicle with a replacement motor vehicle acceptable to the consumer. The refund or replacement must include all reasonably incurred collateral and incidental charges. However, the consumer has an unconditional right to choose a refund rather than a replacement motor vehicle. Upon receipt of such refund or replacement, the consumer, lienholder, or lessor shall furnish to the manufacturer clear title to and possession of the motor vehicle.
(b) Refunds shall be made to the consumer and lienholder of record, if any, as their interests may appear. If applicable, refunds shall be made to the lessor and lessee as follows: The lessee shall receive the lessee cost and the lessor shall receive the lease price less the lessee cost. A penalty for early lease termination may not be assessed against a lessee who receives a replacement motor vehicle or refund under this chapter. The Department of Revenue shall refund to the manufacturer any sales tax which the manufacturer refunded to the consumer, lienholder, or lessor under this section, if the manufacturer provides to the department a written request for a refund and evidence that the sales tax was paid when the vehicle was purchased and that the manufacturer refunded the sales tax to the consumer, lienholder, or lessor.
(3) It is presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken to conform a motor vehicle to the warranty if, during the Lemon Law rights period, either:
(a) The same nonconformity has been subject to repair at least three times by the manufacturer or its authorized service agent, plus a final attempt by the manufacturer to repair the motor vehicle if undertaken as provided for in paragraph (1)(a), and such nonconformity continues to exist; or
(b) The motor vehicle has been out of service by reason of repair of one or more nonconformities by the manufacturer, or its authorized service agent, for a cumulative total of 30 or more days, 60 or more days in the case of a recreational vehicle, exclusive of downtime for routine maintenance prescribed by the owner’s manual. The manufacturer or its authorized service agent must have had at least one opportunity to inspect or repair the vehicle following receipt of the notification as provided in paragraph (1)(b). The 30-day period, or 60-day period in the case of a recreational vehicle, may be extended by any period of time during which repair services are not available to the consumer because of war, invasion, strike, fire, flood, or natural disaster.
(4) It is an affirmative defense to any claim under this chapter that:
(a) The alleged nonconformity does not substantially impair the use, value, or safety of the motor vehicle;
(b) The nonconformity is the result of an accident, abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations of the motor vehicle by persons other than the manufacturer or its authorized service agent; or
(c) The claim by the consumer was not filed in good faith.

Any other affirmative defense allowed by law may be raised against the claim.

History.—s. 5, ch. 83-69; s. 3, ch. 84-55; s. 41, ch. 85-62; s. 4, ch. 85-240; s. 2, ch. 86-229; ss. 4, 19, ch. 88-95; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 4, ch. 92-88; s. 4, ch. 97-245.
Previous Section

Doc thumbnail Section 681.103

Next Section

Doc thumbnail Section 681.106

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 10 pages

Filing # 77899966 E-Filed 09/14/2018 11:05:26 AM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NUMBER: 05-2018-CA-017746 PATRICIA ANNETTE BAXTER and…

Case Filed

Feb 27, 2018

Case Status

ORIGINAL DISPOSED

County

Brevard County, FL

Filed Date

Sep 14, 2018

Category

PRODUCTS LIABILITY

Judge Hon. GEORGE B. TURNER Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for GEORGE B. TURNER
preview-icon 27 pages

Filing # 131768674 E-Filed 07/30/2021 03:43:41 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15'™ JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 50-2019-CA-014710-XXXX-MB ASTON MARTIN LAGONDA OF NORTH AMERICA, INC. Plaintiff, vs. BRIAN MATHEWS, Defendant. / PLAINTIFF, ASTON MARTIN LAGONDA OF NORTH AMERICA, INC.’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE ANY REFERENCE TO THE E OF FLORIDA NEW MOTOR VEHICLE ARBITRATION BOARD’S DECISIONS THAT DEFENDANT’S VEHICLE HAD A NONCONFORMITY Plaintiff, ASTO…

Case Filed

Nov 15, 2019

Case Status

Closed

County

Palm Beach County, FL

Filed Date

Jul 30, 2021

Category

OTHER CIRCUIT

preview-icon 5 pages

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA uv CASE NUMBER: 2012 CA 2399 NC CHRISTOPHER GOODIN and SANDRA GOODIN, wit Re Plaintiffs, 2 3 a oR -“*2~ > fr y SSm S$ Oo ° <4 au on SO & AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., 222 ~ aims SS ~O —~ oe iT] “OF wo ©} 2S? G&S Defendant. / DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant, AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., (hereinafter “AHM”), by and through its undersigned counsel, pursuant to Rule 1.14…

Case Filed

Jun 18, 2011

Case Status

CLOS

County

Sarasota County, FL

Filed Date

Aug 20, 2012

Category

PRODUCT LIABILITY 2010

Judge

DIVISION A, CIRCUIT

preview-icon 3 pages

Filing # 101419775 E-Filed 01/09/2020 04:38:30 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15™ JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA ASTON MARTIN LAGONDA OF NORTH AMERICA, INC. CASE NO.: 50-2019-CA-014710-XXXX-MB Plaintiff, vs. BRIAN MATHEWS, Defendant. / PLAINTIFF’S REPLY AND AVOIDANCE OF DEFENDANT’S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Plaintiff, Aston Martin Lagonda of North America, Inc. (“Aston Martin”), by and through its undersigned Counsel, and pursuant to Rule 1.140 of the Florida Rules of …

Case Filed

Nov 15, 2019

Case Status

Closed

County

Palm Beach County, FL

Filed Date

Jan 09, 2020

Category

OTHER CIRCUIT

preview-icon 25 pages

Filing # 124868007 E-Filed 04/13/2021 10:48:40 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA ASTON MARTIN LAGONDA OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO.: 50-2019-CA-014710-XXXX-MB BRIAN MATHEWS, Defendant. / MATHEWS’ AMENDED MOTION FOR STATUS CONFERENCE AND FOR CLARIFICATION OF THE FEBRUARY 26, 2021 ORDER DENYING JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS COMES NOW Defendant, Brian Matthews, pursuant to the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure,and …

Case Filed

Nov 15, 2019

Case Status

Closed

County

Palm Beach County, FL

Filed Date

Apr 13, 2021

Category

OTHER CIRCUIT

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope