Connecticut General Statutes|Sec. 42a-9-609. Secured party's right to take possession after default. Use of electronic self-help restricted.

                                                

Sec. 42a-9-609. Secured party's right to take possession after default. Use of electronic self-help restricted. (a) After default, a secured party:


(1) May take possession of the collateral; and


(2) Without removal, may render equipment unusable and dispose of collateral on a debtor's premises under section 42a-9-610.


(b) A secured party may proceed under subsection (a):


(1) Pursuant to judicial process; or


(2) Without judicial process, if it proceeds without breach of the peace.


(c) If so agreed, and in any event after default, a secured party may require the debtor to assemble the collateral and make it available to the secured party at a place to be designated by the secured party which is reasonably convenient to both parties.


(d) (1) In this subsection, “electronic self-help” means the use of electronic means to exercise a secured party's rights pursuant to subsection (a) of this section with respect to the security agreement, and “electronic” means relating to technology that has electrical, digital, magnetic or wireless optical electromagnetic properties or similar capabilities. “Electronic self-help” includes the use of electronic means to locate the collateral.


(2) Electronic self-help is permitted only if the debtor separately agrees to a term of the security agreement authorizing electronic self-help that requires notice of exercise as provided in subdivision (3) of this subsection. Except in a consumer transaction, the debtor is deemed to have separately agreed to a term of the security agreement authorizing electronic self-help if a clause is included in the security agreement that specifically states that electronic self-help is authorized.


(3) Before resorting to electronic self-help authorized by a term of the security agreement, the secured party shall give notice to the debtor stating:


(A) That the secured party intends to resort to electronic self-help as a remedy on or after fifteen days following communication of the notice to the debtor;


(B) The nature of the claimed breach which entitled the secured party to resort to self-help; and


(C) The name, title, address and telephone number of a person representing the secured party with whom the debtor may communicate concerning the security interest.


(4) A debtor may recover direct and incidental damages caused by wrongful use of electronic self-help. The debtor may also recover consequential damages for wrongful use of electronic self-help even if such damages are excluded by the terms of the security agreement.


(5) Even if the secured party complies with subdivisions (2) and (3) of this subsection, electronic self-help may not be used if the secured party has reason to know that its use will result in substantial injury or harm to the public health or safety or grave harm to the public interest substantially affecting third parties not involved in the dispute.


(P.A. 01-132, S. 106; P.A. 03-62, S. 16, 17.)


Annotations to former section 42a-9-503:


Cited. 207 C. 15; 221 C. 530.


Cited. 18 CA 265; 29 CA 283; judgment reversed, see 228 C. 795; 46 CA 573.


Cited. 40 CS 475.


History: P.A. 03-62 amended Subsec. (a) to add “and” between Subdivs. (1) and (2), amended Subsec. (d)(2) to add provision that, except in a consumer transaction, the debtor is deemed to have separately agreed to a term of the security agreement authorizing electronic self-help if a clause is included in the security agreement that specifically states that electronic self-help is authorized, and amended Subsec. (d)(3) to redesignate existing Subparas. (i), (ii) and (iii) as Subparas. (A), (B) and (C), respectively.

View Latest Dockets

29 Files
Filed

Mar 28, 2022

Judge

Hon. Claudia A. Baio Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Claudia A. Baio

Court

Fairfield County

County

Fairfield County, CT

19 Files
Filed

Oct 15, 2013

Judge

Hon. Kevin S. Russo Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Kevin S. Russo

Court

Fairfield County

County

Fairfield County, CT

Practice Area

Property

Matter Type

Foreclosure

23 Files
Filed

Aug 02, 2023

Judge

Hon. Susan Quinn Cobb Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Susan Quinn Cobb

Court

Superior

County

Hartford County, CT

6 Files
Filed

Nov 27, 2023

Court

Superior

County

Hartford County, CT

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

Insurance Coverage

22 Files
Filed

Mar 10, 2015

Court

New Haven County

County

New Haven County, CT

Practice Area

Creditor

Matter Type

Collections

View More Dockets

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 2 pages

HFH-CV22-6019756-S Superior Court Ansonia Acquisitions I, LLC, Housing Session d/b/a Woodcliff Estates (80 Washington Street Hartford, CT 06106) v. Annette Rodriguez …

County

Fairfield County, CT

Filed Date

Jul 20, 2022

Judge Hon. Claudia A. Baio Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Claudia A. Baio
preview-icon 4 pages

DOCKET NO.: NNH CV-12-6031105S = : SUPERIOR COURT NRT NEW ENGLAND LLC d/b/a Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN V. : ATNEW HAVEN CHRISTOPHER G. L. JONES : SEPTEMBER 23, 2014 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION On July 28, 2014 this court rendered a Memorandum of Decision finding that the plaintiff had proven damages of $34,375.00 on the second count. This court scheduled a hearing to determine the amount of attorney’s fees and costs, and the amount of the total judgmen…

County

New Haven County, CT

Filed Date

Sep 23, 2014

Judge Hon. Michael G. Maronich Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Michael G. Maronich
preview-icon 7 pages

No. FST-CV15-5014471-S JEREMY COLLINS, : SUPERIOR COURT MOLLY MCCULLOUGH Plaintiffs : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD vs. | AT STAMFORD MARGARET MONTANARO Defendant : March 9, 2015 AMENDED COMPLA FIRST COUNT 1. is is an action brought under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (hereinafter, "CUTPA"), Chapter 735a Section 42-110g of the Connecticut General Statutes in order to obtain relief against Defendant for alleged violations of General Statutes Section 42-11 0b(a), prohibiting u…

County

Fairfield County, CT

Filed Date

Mar 09, 2015

Judge Hon. Douglas C. Mintz Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Douglas C. Mintz
preview-icon 7 pages

No. FST-CV15-5014471-S JEREMY COLLINS, f SUPERIOR COURT MOLLY MCCULLOUGH : Plaintiffs i JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD vs. : AT STAMFORD MARGARET MONTANARO Defendant : March 9, 2015 REVISED COMPLAINT FIRST COUNT 1 This is an action brought under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (hereinafter, "CUTPA"), Chapter 735a Section 42-110g of the Connecticut General Statutes in order to obtain relief against Defendant for alleged violations of General Statutes Section 42-110b(a), prohibiting …

County

Fairfield County, CT

Filed Date

Mar 09, 2015

Judge Hon. Douglas C. Mintz Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Douglas C. Mintz
preview-icon 9 pages

No. FST-CV15-5014471-S JEREMY COLLINS, z SUPERIOR COURT MOLLY MCCULLOUGH ie Plaintiffs : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD vs. AT STAMFORD MARGARET MONTANARO Defendant : April 24, 2015 REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT In the above entitled action, the Plaintiffs respectfully request that they be granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint, which is appended to this request, pursuant to Connecticut Practice Book 10-60(a)(3). BY: St MA. e Jeremy Collins & Molly Mc@ulloug…

County

Fairfield County, CT

Filed Date

Apr 24, 2015

Judge Hon. Douglas C. Mintz Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Douglas C. Mintz
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope