Connecticut General Statutes|Sec. 42a-9-324. Priority of purchase-money security interests.

                                                

Sec. 42a-9-324. Priority of purchase-money security interests. (a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (g), a perfected purchase-money security interest in goods other than inventory or livestock has priority over a conflicting security interest in the same goods, and, except as otherwise provided in section 42a-9-327, a perfected security interest in its identifiable proceeds also has priority, if the purchase-money security interest is perfected when the debtor receives possession of the collateral or within twenty days thereafter.


(b) Subject to subsection (c) and except as otherwise provided in subsection (g), a perfected purchase-money security interest in inventory has priority over a conflicting security interest in the same inventory, has priority over a conflicting security interest in chattel paper or an instrument constituting proceeds of the inventory and in proceeds of the chattel paper, if so provided in section 42a-9-330, and, except as otherwise provided in section 42a-9-327, also has priority in identifiable cash proceeds of the inventory to the extent the identifiable cash proceeds are received on or before the delivery of the inventory to a buyer, if:


(1) The purchase-money security interest is perfected when the debtor receives possession of the inventory;


(2) The purchase-money secured party sends an authenticated notification to the holder of the conflicting security interest;


(3) The holder of the conflicting security interest receives the notification within five years before the debtor receives possession of the inventory; and


(4) The notification states that the person sending the notification has or expects to acquire a purchase-money security interest in inventory of the debtor and describes the inventory.


(c) Subdivisions (2) to (4), inclusive, of subsection (b) apply only if the holder of the conflicting security interest had filed a financing statement covering the same types of inventory:


(1) If the purchase-money security interest is perfected by filing, before the date of the filing; or


(2) If the purchase-money security interest is temporarily perfected without filing or possession under subsection (f) of section 42a-9-312, before the beginning of the twenty-day period thereunder.


(d) Subject to subsection (e) and except as otherwise provided in subsection (g), a perfected purchase-money security interest in livestock that are farm products has priority over a conflicting security interest in the same livestock, and, except as otherwise provided in section 42a-9-327, a perfected security interest in their identifiable proceeds and identifiable products in their unmanufactured states also has priority, if:


(1) The purchase-money security interest is perfected when the debtor receives possession of the livestock;


(2) The purchase-money secured party sends an authenticated notification to the holder of the conflicting security interest;


(3) The holder of the conflicting security interest receives the notification within six months before the debtor receives possession of the livestock; and


(4) The notification states that the person sending the notification has or expects to acquire a purchase-money security interest in livestock of the debtor and describes the livestock.


(e) Subdivisions (2) to (4), inclusive, of subsection (d) apply only if the holder of the conflicting security interest had filed a financing statement covering the same types of livestock:


(1) If the purchase-money security interest is perfected by filing, before the date of the filing; or


(2) If the purchase-money security interest is temporarily perfected without filing or possession under subsection (f) of section 42a-9-312, before the beginning of the twenty-day period thereunder.


(f) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (g), a perfected purchase-money security interest in software has priority over a conflicting security interest in the same collateral, and, except as otherwise provided in section 42a-9-327, a perfected security interest in its identifiable proceeds also has priority, to the extent that the purchase-money security interest in the goods in which the software was acquired for use has priority in the goods and proceeds of the goods under this section.


(g) If more than one security interest qualifies for priority in the same collateral under subsection (a), (b), (d) or (f):


(1) A security interest securing an obligation incurred as all or part of the price of the collateral has priority over a security interest securing an obligation incurred for value given to enable the debtor to acquire rights in or the use of collateral; and


(2) In all other cases, subsection (a) of section 42a-9-322 applies to the qualifying security interests.


(P.A. 01-132, S. 44.)


View Latest Dockets

29 Files
Filed

Mar 28, 2022

Judge

Hon. Claudia A. Baio Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Claudia A. Baio

Court

Fairfield County

County

Fairfield County, CT

19 Files
Filed

Oct 15, 2013

Judge

Hon. Kevin S. Russo Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Kevin S. Russo

Court

Fairfield County

County

Fairfield County, CT

Practice Area

Property

Matter Type

Foreclosure

23 Files
Filed

Aug 02, 2023

Judge

Hon. Susan Quinn Cobb Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Susan Quinn Cobb

Court

Superior

County

Hartford County, CT

6 Files
Filed

Nov 27, 2023

Court

Superior

County

Hartford County, CT

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

Insurance Coverage

3 Files
Filed

Jan 26, 2024

Court

Hartford County

County

Hartford County, CT

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

General Insurance

View More Dockets

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 2 pages

HFH-CV22-6019756-S Superior Court Ansonia Acquisitions I, LLC, Housing Session d/b/a Woodcliff Estates (80 Washington Street Hartford, CT 06106) v. Annette Rodriguez …

County

Fairfield County, CT

Filed Date

Jul 20, 2022

Judge Hon. Claudia A. Baio Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Claudia A. Baio
preview-icon 4 pages

DOCKET NO.: NNH CV-12-6031105S = : SUPERIOR COURT NRT NEW ENGLAND LLC d/b/a Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN V. : ATNEW HAVEN CHRISTOPHER G. L. JONES : SEPTEMBER 23, 2014 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION On July 28, 2014 this court rendered a Memorandum of Decision finding that the plaintiff had proven damages of $34,375.00 on the second count. This court scheduled a hearing to determine the amount of attorney’s fees and costs, and the amount of the total judgmen…

County

New Haven County, CT

Filed Date

Sep 23, 2014

Judge Hon. Michael G. Maronich Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Michael G. Maronich
preview-icon 7 pages

No. FST-CV15-5014471-S JEREMY COLLINS, : SUPERIOR COURT MOLLY MCCULLOUGH Plaintiffs : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD vs. | AT STAMFORD MARGARET MONTANARO Defendant : March 9, 2015 AMENDED COMPLA FIRST COUNT 1. is is an action brought under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (hereinafter, "CUTPA"), Chapter 735a Section 42-110g of the Connecticut General Statutes in order to obtain relief against Defendant for alleged violations of General Statutes Section 42-11 0b(a), prohibiting u…

County

Fairfield County, CT

Filed Date

Mar 09, 2015

Judge Hon. Douglas C. Mintz Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Douglas C. Mintz
preview-icon 7 pages

No. FST-CV15-5014471-S JEREMY COLLINS, f SUPERIOR COURT MOLLY MCCULLOUGH : Plaintiffs i JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD vs. : AT STAMFORD MARGARET MONTANARO Defendant : March 9, 2015 REVISED COMPLAINT FIRST COUNT 1 This is an action brought under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (hereinafter, "CUTPA"), Chapter 735a Section 42-110g of the Connecticut General Statutes in order to obtain relief against Defendant for alleged violations of General Statutes Section 42-110b(a), prohibiting …

County

Fairfield County, CT

Filed Date

Mar 09, 2015

Judge Hon. Douglas C. Mintz Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Douglas C. Mintz
preview-icon 9 pages

No. FST-CV15-5014471-S JEREMY COLLINS, z SUPERIOR COURT MOLLY MCCULLOUGH ie Plaintiffs : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD vs. AT STAMFORD MARGARET MONTANARO Defendant : April 24, 2015 REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT In the above entitled action, the Plaintiffs respectfully request that they be granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint, which is appended to this request, pursuant to Connecticut Practice Book 10-60(a)(3). BY: St MA. e Jeremy Collins & Molly Mc@ulloug…

County

Fairfield County, CT

Filed Date

Apr 24, 2015

Judge Hon. Douglas C. Mintz Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Douglas C. Mintz
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope