Connecticut General Statutes|Sec. 42a-8-202. Issuer's responsibility and defenses; notice of defect or defense.

                                                

Sec. 42a-8-202. Issuer's responsibility and defenses; notice of defect or defense. (a) Even against a purchaser for value and without notice, the terms of a certificated security include terms stated on the certificate and terms made part of the security by reference on the certificate to another instrument, indenture or document or to a constitution, statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, order or the like, to the extent the terms referred to do not conflict with terms stated on the certificate. A reference under this subsection does not of itself charge a purchaser for value with notice of a defect going to the validity of the security, even if the certificate expressly states that a person accepting it admits notice. The terms of an uncertificated security include those stated in any instrument, indenture or document or in a constitution, statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, order or the like, pursuant to which the security is issued.


(b) The following rules apply if an issuer asserts that a security is not valid:


(1) A security other than one issued by a government or governmental subdivision, agency or instrumentality, even though issued with a defect going to its validity, is valid in the hands of a purchaser for value and without notice of the particular defect unless the defect involves a violation of a constitutional provision. In that case, the security is valid in the hands of a purchaser for value and without notice of the defect, other than one who takes by original issue.


(2) Subdivision (1) of this subsection applies to an issuer that is a government or governmental subdivision, agency or instrumentality only if there has been substantial compliance with the legal requirements governing the issue or the issuer has received a substantial consideration for the issue as a whole or for the particular security and a stated purpose of the issue is one for which the issuer has power to borrow money or issue the security.


(c) Except as otherwise provided in section 42a-8-205, lack of genuineness of a certificated security is a complete defense, even against a purchaser for value and without notice.


(d) All other defenses of the issuer of a security, including nondelivery and conditional delivery of a certificated security, are ineffective against a purchaser for value who has taken the certificated security without notice of the particular defense.


(e) This section does not affect the right of a party to cancel a contract for a security “when, as and if issued” or “when distributed” in the event of a material change in the character of the security that is the subject of the contract or in the plan or arrangement pursuant to which the security is to be issued or distributed.


(f) If a security is held by a securities intermediary against whom an entitlement holder has a security entitlement with respect to the security, the issuer may not assert any defense that the issuer could not assert if the entitlement holder held the security directly.


(1959, P.A. 133, S. 8-202; P.A. 79-435, S. 9; P.A 97-182, S. 18.)


History: P.A. 79-435 applied previous provisions to certificated securities, added provisions specifically applicable to uncertificated securities and reworded provisions for clarity; P.A. 97-182 revised and rephrased section, replaced numeric with alphabetic Subsec. indicators and added Subsec. (f) re assertion of defense when security held by a securities intermediary.

View Latest Dockets

29 Files
Filed

Mar 28, 2022

Judge

Hon. Claudia A. Baio Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Claudia A. Baio

Court

Fairfield County

County

Fairfield County, CT

19 Files
Filed

Oct 15, 2013

Judge

Hon. Kevin S. Russo Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Kevin S. Russo

Court

Fairfield County

County

Fairfield County, CT

Practice Area

Property

Matter Type

Foreclosure

23 Files
Filed

Aug 02, 2023

Judge

Hon. Susan Quinn Cobb Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Susan Quinn Cobb

Court

Superior

County

Hartford County, CT

6 Files
Filed

Nov 27, 2023

Court

Superior

County

Hartford County, CT

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

Insurance Coverage

22 Files
Filed

Mar 10, 2015

Court

New Haven County

County

New Haven County, CT

Practice Area

Creditor

Matter Type

Collections

View More Dockets
Previous Section

Doc thumbnail Sec. 42a-8-201. Issuer.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 2 pages

HFH-CV22-6019756-S Superior Court Ansonia Acquisitions I, LLC, Housing Session d/b/a Woodcliff Estates (80 Washington Street Hartford, CT 06106) v. Annette Rodriguez …

County

Fairfield County, CT

Filed Date

Jul 20, 2022

Judge Hon. Claudia A. Baio Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Claudia A. Baio
preview-icon 4 pages

DOCKET NO.: NNH CV-12-6031105S = : SUPERIOR COURT NRT NEW ENGLAND LLC d/b/a Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN V. : ATNEW HAVEN CHRISTOPHER G. L. JONES : SEPTEMBER 23, 2014 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION On July 28, 2014 this court rendered a Memorandum of Decision finding that the plaintiff had proven damages of $34,375.00 on the second count. This court scheduled a hearing to determine the amount of attorney’s fees and costs, and the amount of the total judgmen…

County

New Haven County, CT

Filed Date

Sep 23, 2014

Judge Hon. Michael G. Maronich Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Michael G. Maronich
preview-icon 7 pages

No. FST-CV15-5014471-S JEREMY COLLINS, : SUPERIOR COURT MOLLY MCCULLOUGH Plaintiffs : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD vs. | AT STAMFORD MARGARET MONTANARO Defendant : March 9, 2015 AMENDED COMPLA FIRST COUNT 1. is is an action brought under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (hereinafter, "CUTPA"), Chapter 735a Section 42-110g of the Connecticut General Statutes in order to obtain relief against Defendant for alleged violations of General Statutes Section 42-11 0b(a), prohibiting u…

County

Fairfield County, CT

Filed Date

Mar 09, 2015

Judge Hon. Douglas C. Mintz Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Douglas C. Mintz
preview-icon 7 pages

No. FST-CV15-5014471-S JEREMY COLLINS, f SUPERIOR COURT MOLLY MCCULLOUGH : Plaintiffs i JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD vs. : AT STAMFORD MARGARET MONTANARO Defendant : March 9, 2015 REVISED COMPLAINT FIRST COUNT 1 This is an action brought under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (hereinafter, "CUTPA"), Chapter 735a Section 42-110g of the Connecticut General Statutes in order to obtain relief against Defendant for alleged violations of General Statutes Section 42-110b(a), prohibiting …

County

Fairfield County, CT

Filed Date

Mar 09, 2015

Judge Hon. Douglas C. Mintz Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Douglas C. Mintz
preview-icon 9 pages

No. FST-CV15-5014471-S JEREMY COLLINS, z SUPERIOR COURT MOLLY MCCULLOUGH ie Plaintiffs : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD vs. AT STAMFORD MARGARET MONTANARO Defendant : April 24, 2015 REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT In the above entitled action, the Plaintiffs respectfully request that they be granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint, which is appended to this request, pursuant to Connecticut Practice Book 10-60(a)(3). BY: St MA. e Jeremy Collins & Molly Mc@ulloug…

County

Fairfield County, CT

Filed Date

Apr 24, 2015

Judge Hon. Douglas C. Mintz Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Douglas C. Mintz
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope