Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
Sec. 31-50a. Noncompete agreements: Security guards. (a) No employer may require any person employed in the classification 339032 of the standard occupational classification system of the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor to enter into an agreement prohibiting such person from engaging in the same or a similar job, at the same location at which the employer employs such person, for another employer or as a self-employed person, unless the employer proves that such person has obtained trade secrets, as defined in subsection (d) of section 35-51, of the employer.
(b) (1) Any person who is aggrieved by a violation of this section may bring a civil action in the Superior Court to recover damages and for such injunctive and equitable relief as the court deems appropriate.
(2) The Labor Commissioner may request the Attorney General to bring an action in the superior court for the judicial district of Hartford for restitution on behalf of any person injured by any violation of this section and for such injunctive or equitable relief as the court deems appropriate.
(c) The provisions of this section shall apply to agreements entered into, renewed or extended on or after October 1, 2007.
(P.A. 07-237, S. 1.)
Feb 23, 2022
Non-Jury Verdict
New London County
New London County, CT
Jul 25, 2014
Dismissal
New Haven County
New Haven County, CT
May 16, 2017
Dismissal
Hartford County
Hartford County, CT
Jan 22, 2014
Trial Verdict
Windham County
Windham County, CT
Apr 27, 2015
Trial Verdict
Hartford County
Hartford County, CT
DOCKET NO. CV-17-6078460 : SUPERIOR COURT : : HARTFORD FEDERATION OF : JUDICIAL DISTRICT TEACHERS, LOCAL 1018 : OF HARTFORD …
May 16, 2017
CONNECTICUT SMALL CLAIMS MATTER ANASTASIOU, JOCELYN : Civ. No. KNL-CV22-6055368S v. : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON NORWICH BOARD OF ED. ET AL. : AUGUST 4, 2022 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR § 31-72 DAMAGES …
Feb 23, 2022
New London County, CT
Aug 04, 2022
+ Juris No. 416477 DOCKET NO. WWM-CV14-6008110-S : SUPERIOR COURT JILLIAN L. HANLEY : LD. OF WINDHAM v. : ATPUTNAM XSE GROUP, INC., d/b/a : AZTEC OFFICE, LLC : JUNE 19, 2015 MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE OF C.G.S. § 31-72 DAMAGES The Defendant, XSE Group, Inc. d/b/a Aztec Office, LLC, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby move to preclude all evidence, or any reference thereto, pertaining to Plaintiff's alleged damages pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes § 31-72 …
Jan 22, 2014
STATE OF CONNECTICUT DOCKET NO: UWY-CV14-6025482-S : : : TCHAOU TCHABANGNA, MOUSTAFA : ADAM, VERNON SUTTON AND : …
Jul 25, 2014
New Haven County, CT
Jun 02, 2015
GRIFFITH & KELLY, LLC —- ATTORNEYS AT LAW 66 CEDAR STREET, NEWINGTON, CONNECTICUT 06111-2646 — 860.667.0855 — FAX 860.667.9260- JURIS NO. 100655 DOCKET NO.: HHD-CV-15-6058932-S : SUPERIOR COURT CHRISTINE CARROLL, Plaintiff ' : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD VS. : AT HARTFORD NEWINGTON FINANCIAL, LLC D/B/A, JACKSON HEWITT and JEFFREY L. HEDBERG, Defendants : JUNE 10, 2019 POST-JUDGMENT/VERDICT MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS FROM PLAINTIFF INACCORDANCE WITH CONNECTICUT GENERAL STATUT…
Apr 27, 2015
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.