Connecticut General Statutes|Sec. 31-3l. Regional work force development boards: Members.

                                                

Sec. 31-3l. Regional work force development boards: Members. The members of a board shall be appointed by the chief elected officials of the municipalities in the region in accordance with the provisions of an agreement entered into by such municipalities. In the absence of an agreement the appointments shall be made by the Governor. The membership of each board shall satisfy the requirements for a private industry council as provided under the Job Training Partnership Act and the requirements of the federal Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014, P.L. 113-128, as from time to time amended. To the extent consistent with such requirements: (1) Business members shall constitute a majority of each board and shall include owners of businesses, chief executives or chief operating officers of nongovernmental employers, or other business executives who have substantial management or policy responsibilities. Whenever possible, at least one-half of the business and industry members shall be representatives of small businesses, including minority businesses; (2) the nonbusiness members shall include representatives of community-based organizations, state and local organized labor, state and municipal government, human service agencies, economic development agencies and regional community-technical colleges and other educational institutions, including secondary and postsecondary institutions and regional vocational technical schools; (3) the nonbusiness representatives shall be selected by the appointing authority from among individuals nominated by the commissioner and the organizations, agencies, institutions and groups set forth in subdivisions (2) and (5) of this section, and each appointing authority shall solicit nominations from the commissioner and the organizations, agencies, institutions and groups set forth in subdivisions (2) and (5) of this section; (4) labor representatives shall be selected from individuals recommended by recognized state and local labor federations in a manner consistent with the federal Job Training Partnership Act and the federal Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014, P.L. 113-128, as from time to time amended; (5) the board shall represent the interests of a broad segment of the population of the region, including the interests of welfare recipients, persons with disabilities, veterans, dislocated workers, younger and older workers, women, minorities and displaced homemakers; and (6) in each region where a private industry council has elected by a vote of its members to become a regional work force development board and the commissioner has approved the council as a board, the initial membership of each board shall include, but not be limited to, the business members of the private industry council in the region.


(P.A. 92-145, S. 3, 10; P.A. 93-134, S. 2; P.A. 96-190, S. 2, 8; P.A. 99-195, S. 5, 15; P.A. 16-169, S. 24.)


History: P.A. 93-134 amended Subdiv. (1) to delete provision re membership of business members of private industry council, amended Subdiv. (4) to require selection of members by labor federations in manner consistent with Job Training Partnership Act rather than by labor organizations or building trade councils and added Subdiv. (6) to specify minimum requirements for initial membership of such boards in cases where private industry council has been approved as a board; P.A. 96-190 added regional community-technical colleges to the list of nonbusiness members, effective July 1, 1996; P.A. 99-195 added provision specifying that membership of each board must satisfy the requirements of the federal Workforce Investment Act of 1998, effective June 23, 1999; pursuant to P.A. 16-169, “Workforce Investment Act of 1998, P.L. 105-220” was changed editorially by the Revisors to “Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014, P.L. 113-128”.

View Latest Dockets

13 Files
Filed

Feb 23, 2022

Status

Non-Jury Verdict

Court

New London County

County

New London County, CT

Practice Area

Commercial

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

36 Files
Filed

Jul 25, 2014

Status

Dismissal

Court

New Haven County

County

New Haven County, CT

57 Files
Filed

May 16, 2017

Status

Dismissal

Judge

Hon. Cesar A. Noble Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Cesar A. Noble

Court

Hartford County

County

Hartford County, CT

Practice Area

Arbitration

Matter Type

General Arbitration

63 Files
Filed

Jan 22, 2014

Status

Trial Verdict

Judge

Hon. James J. Devine Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for James J. Devine

Court

Windham County

County

Windham County, CT

81 Files
Filed

Apr 27, 2015

Status

Trial Verdict

Judge

Hon. A. Susan Peck Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for A. Susan Peck

Court

Hartford County

County

Hartford County, CT

View More Dockets

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 9 pages

DOCKET NO. CV-17-6078460 : SUPERIOR COURT : : HARTFORD FEDERATION OF : JUDICIAL DISTRICT TEACHERS, LOCAL 1018 : OF HARTFORD …

County

Hartford County, CT

Filed Date

Apr 02, 2018

Judge Hon. Cesar A. Noble Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Cesar A. Noble
preview-icon 2 pages

CONNECTICUT SMALL CLAIMS MATTER ANASTASIOU, JOCELYN : Civ. No. KNL-CV22-6055368S v. : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON NORWICH BOARD OF ED. ET AL. : AUGUST 4, 2022 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR § 31-72 DAMAGES …

County

New London County, CT

Filed Date

Aug 04, 2022

preview-icon 13 pages

+ Juris No. 416477 DOCKET NO. WWM-CV14-6008110-S : SUPERIOR COURT JILLIAN L. HANLEY : LD. OF WINDHAM v. : ATPUTNAM XSE GROUP, INC., d/b/a : AZTEC OFFICE, LLC : JUNE 19, 2015 MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE OF C.G.S. § 31-72 DAMAGES The Defendant, XSE Group, Inc. d/b/a Aztec Office, LLC, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby move to preclude all evidence, or any reference thereto, pertaining to Plaintiff's alleged damages pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes § 31-72 …

County

Windham County, CT

Filed Date

Jun 19, 2015

Judge Hon. James J. Devine Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for James J. Devine
preview-icon 6 pages

STATE OF CONNECTICUT DOCKET NO: UWY-CV14-6025482-S : : : TCHAOU TCHABANGNA, MOUSTAFA : ADAM, VERNON SUTTON AND : …

County

New Haven County, CT

Filed Date

Jun 02, 2015

preview-icon 3 pages

GRIFFITH & KELLY, LLC —- ATTORNEYS AT LAW 66 CEDAR STREET, NEWINGTON, CONNECTICUT 06111-2646 — 860.667.0855 — FAX 860.667.9260- JURIS NO. 100655 DOCKET NO.: HHD-CV-15-6058932-S : SUPERIOR COURT CHRISTINE CARROLL, Plaintiff ' : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD VS. : AT HARTFORD NEWINGTON FINANCIAL, LLC D/B/A, JACKSON HEWITT and JEFFREY L. HEDBERG, Defendants : JUNE 10, 2019 POST-JUDGMENT/VERDICT MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS FROM PLAINTIFF INACCORDANCE WITH CONNECTICUT GENERAL STATUT…

County

Hartford County, CT

Filed Date

Jun 10, 2019

Judge Hon. A. Susan Peck Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for A. Susan Peck
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope