Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
Sec. 31-3l. Regional work force development boards: Members. The members of a board shall be appointed by the chief elected officials of the municipalities in the region in accordance with the provisions of an agreement entered into by such municipalities. In the absence of an agreement the appointments shall be made by the Governor. The membership of each board shall satisfy the requirements for a private industry council as provided under the Job Training Partnership Act and the requirements of the federal Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014, P.L. 113-128, as from time to time amended. To the extent consistent with such requirements: (1) Business members shall constitute a majority of each board and shall include owners of businesses, chief executives or chief operating officers of nongovernmental employers, or other business executives who have substantial management or policy responsibilities. Whenever possible, at least one-half of the business and industry members shall be representatives of small businesses, including minority businesses; (2) the nonbusiness members shall include representatives of community-based organizations, state and local organized labor, state and municipal government, human service agencies, economic development agencies and regional community-technical colleges and other educational institutions, including secondary and postsecondary institutions and regional vocational technical schools; (3) the nonbusiness representatives shall be selected by the appointing authority from among individuals nominated by the commissioner and the organizations, agencies, institutions and groups set forth in subdivisions (2) and (5) of this section, and each appointing authority shall solicit nominations from the commissioner and the organizations, agencies, institutions and groups set forth in subdivisions (2) and (5) of this section; (4) labor representatives shall be selected from individuals recommended by recognized state and local labor federations in a manner consistent with the federal Job Training Partnership Act and the federal Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014, P.L. 113-128, as from time to time amended; (5) the board shall represent the interests of a broad segment of the population of the region, including the interests of welfare recipients, persons with disabilities, veterans, dislocated workers, younger and older workers, women, minorities and displaced homemakers; and (6) in each region where a private industry council has elected by a vote of its members to become a regional work force development board and the commissioner has approved the council as a board, the initial membership of each board shall include, but not be limited to, the business members of the private industry council in the region.
(P.A. 92-145, S. 3, 10; P.A. 93-134, S. 2; P.A. 96-190, S. 2, 8; P.A. 99-195, S. 5, 15; P.A. 16-169, S. 24.)
Feb 23, 2022
Non-Jury Verdict
New London County
New London County, CT
Jul 25, 2014
Dismissal
New Haven County
New Haven County, CT
May 16, 2017
Dismissal
Hartford County
Hartford County, CT
Jan 22, 2014
Trial Verdict
Windham County
Windham County, CT
Apr 27, 2015
Trial Verdict
Hartford County
Hartford County, CT
DOCKET NO. CV-17-6078460 : SUPERIOR COURT : : HARTFORD FEDERATION OF : JUDICIAL DISTRICT TEACHERS, LOCAL 1018 : OF HARTFORD …
May 16, 2017
CONNECTICUT SMALL CLAIMS MATTER ANASTASIOU, JOCELYN : Civ. No. KNL-CV22-6055368S v. : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON NORWICH BOARD OF ED. ET AL. : AUGUST 4, 2022 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR § 31-72 DAMAGES …
Feb 23, 2022
New London County, CT
Aug 04, 2022
+ Juris No. 416477 DOCKET NO. WWM-CV14-6008110-S : SUPERIOR COURT JILLIAN L. HANLEY : LD. OF WINDHAM v. : ATPUTNAM XSE GROUP, INC., d/b/a : AZTEC OFFICE, LLC : JUNE 19, 2015 MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE OF C.G.S. § 31-72 DAMAGES The Defendant, XSE Group, Inc. d/b/a Aztec Office, LLC, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby move to preclude all evidence, or any reference thereto, pertaining to Plaintiff's alleged damages pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes § 31-72 …
Jan 22, 2014
STATE OF CONNECTICUT DOCKET NO: UWY-CV14-6025482-S : : : TCHAOU TCHABANGNA, MOUSTAFA : ADAM, VERNON SUTTON AND : …
Jul 25, 2014
New Haven County, CT
Jun 02, 2015
GRIFFITH & KELLY, LLC —- ATTORNEYS AT LAW 66 CEDAR STREET, NEWINGTON, CONNECTICUT 06111-2646 — 860.667.0855 — FAX 860.667.9260- JURIS NO. 100655 DOCKET NO.: HHD-CV-15-6058932-S : SUPERIOR COURT CHRISTINE CARROLL, Plaintiff ' : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD VS. : AT HARTFORD NEWINGTON FINANCIAL, LLC D/B/A, JACKSON HEWITT and JEFFREY L. HEDBERG, Defendants : JUNE 10, 2019 POST-JUDGMENT/VERDICT MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS FROM PLAINTIFF INACCORDANCE WITH CONNECTICUT GENERAL STATUT…
Apr 27, 2015
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.