Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
Sec. 42-110aa. Refund and exchange policies, generally. (a) Refusal to accept returns prohibited. Use of electronic monitoring system. No person engaged in trade or commerce in this state, upon the return of goods purchased from such person's place of business, shall refuse to accept the returned goods immediately and issue the individual returning such goods either a cash or credit refund of the purchase price or credit towards the purchase of another item offered for sale at such person's place of business, provided such return is made within the period of time established by such person for the acceptance of returned goods and provided further, such goods are returned in a manner consistent with such person's conspicuously posted refund or exchange policy. Any such person that utilizes an electronic system to record, monitor and limit the number or total dollar value of returns made by a consumer shall clearly indicate the use of such system within such person's conspicuously posted refund or exchange policy.
(b) Notice of termination of right to return goods. Any person that utilizes an electronic system to record, monitor and limit the number or total dollar value of returns made by a consumer shall, prior to terminating the right of any such consumer to return goods at such person's place of business pursuant to any such limitation, provide written notice to such consumer that indicates such termination. Such termination notice shall not affect such consumer's right to return any goods purchased by such consumer or purchased for the benefit of such consumer prior to the date of such notice, if such consumer has a valid receipt evidencing a purchase date for such goods that is prior to the date such consumer receives such notice. Any such notice that is mailed to the last-known address of such consumer or to the address of such consumer that is obtained through reasonably available public records shall be deemed to comply with the notification requirements of this subsection.
(c) Extension of time for accepting returned goods permitted. This section shall not be construed to prohibit any person engaged in trade or commerce in this state from extending the period of time during which such person will accept the return of goods purchased from such person's place of business.
(d) Exemptions. This section does not apply to perishable goods, including readily perishable foods and beverages, or goods clearly marked as nonreturnable pursuant to such person's conspicuously posted refund or exchange policy.
(e) Violation deemed unfair trade practice. Any violation of the provisions of subsection (a) of this section shall constitute an unfair trade practice for purposes of section 42-110b.
(P.A. 99-274, S. 1; P.A. 05-138, S. 1; P.A. 07-150, S. 1.)
Nov 27, 2023
Superior
Hartford County, CT
Mar 10, 2015
New Haven County
New Haven County, CT
HFH-CV22-6019756-S Superior Court Ansonia Acquisitions I, LLC, Housing Session d/b/a Woodcliff Estates (80 Washington Street Hartford, CT 06106) v. Annette Rodriguez …
Mar 28, 2022
DOCKET NO.: NNH CV-12-6031105S = : SUPERIOR COURT NRT NEW ENGLAND LLC d/b/a Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN V. : ATNEW HAVEN CHRISTOPHER G. L. JONES : SEPTEMBER 23, 2014 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION On July 28, 2014 this court rendered a Memorandum of Decision finding that the plaintiff had proven damages of $34,375.00 on the second count. This court scheduled a hearing to determine the amount of attorney’s fees and costs, and the amount of the total judgmen…
Jul 10, 2012
No. FST-CV15-5014471-S JEREMY COLLINS, : SUPERIOR COURT MOLLY MCCULLOUGH Plaintiffs : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD vs. | AT STAMFORD MARGARET MONTANARO Defendant : March 9, 2015 AMENDED COMPLA FIRST COUNT 1. is is an action brought under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (hereinafter, "CUTPA"), Chapter 735a Section 42-110g of the Connecticut General Statutes in order to obtain relief against Defendant for alleged violations of General Statutes Section 42-11 0b(a), prohibiting u…
Feb 17, 2015
No. FST-CV15-5014471-S JEREMY COLLINS, f SUPERIOR COURT MOLLY MCCULLOUGH : Plaintiffs i JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD vs. : AT STAMFORD MARGARET MONTANARO Defendant : March 9, 2015 REVISED COMPLAINT FIRST COUNT 1 This is an action brought under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (hereinafter, "CUTPA"), Chapter 735a Section 42-110g of the Connecticut General Statutes in order to obtain relief against Defendant for alleged violations of General Statutes Section 42-110b(a), prohibiting …
Feb 17, 2015
No. FST-CV15-5014471-S JEREMY COLLINS, z SUPERIOR COURT MOLLY MCCULLOUGH ie Plaintiffs : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD vs. AT STAMFORD MARGARET MONTANARO Defendant : April 24, 2015 REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT In the above entitled action, the Plaintiffs respectfully request that they be granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint, which is appended to this request, pursuant to Connecticut Practice Book 10-60(a)(3). BY: St MA. e Jeremy Collins & Molly Mc@ulloug…
Feb 17, 2015
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.