California Rules of Court|Rule 7.756. Compensation of conservators and guardians

                                                

<< Previous Rule
[ Back to Title Index ]
     |       Printer-friendly version of this page

2024 California Rules of Court

Rule 7.756. Compensation of conservators and guardians

(a) Standards for determining just and reasonable compensation

The court may consider the following nonexclusive factors in determining just and reasonable compensation for a conservator from the estate of the conservatee or a guardian from the estate of the ward for services rendered in the best interest of the conservatee or ward up to that time:

(1)  The size and nature of the conservatee's or ward's estate;

(2)  The benefit to the conservatee or ward, or his or her estate, of the conservator's or guardian's services;

(3)  The necessity for the services performed;

(4)  The conservatee's or ward's anticipated future needs and income;

(5)  The time spent by the conservator or guardian in the performance of services;

(6)  Whether the services performed were routine or required more than ordinary skill or judgment;

(7)  Any unusual skill, expertise, or experience brought to the performance of services;

(8)  The conservator's or guardian's estimate of the value of the services performed; and

(9)  The compensation customarily allowed by the court in the community where the court is located for the management of conservatorships or guardianships of similar size and complexity.

(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2023.)

(b) No single factor determinative

No single factor listed in (a) should be the exclusive basis for the court's determination of just and reasonable compensation for services rendered in the best interest of the conservatee or ward.

(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2023.)

(c) No inflexible maximum or minimum compensation or maximum approved hourly rate

This rule is not authority for a court to set an inflexible maximum or minimum compensation or a maximum approved hourly rate for compensation.

Rule 7.756 amended effective January 1, 2023; adopted effective January 1, 2008.

View Latest Dockets

Filed

Nov 10, 1994

Status

Judgment (Other)

Judge

Hon. DeMeo, Bradford Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for DeMeo, Bradford

Court

Sonoma County

County

Sonoma County, CA

Category

Probate

Practice Area

Probate

Matter Type

General Probate

Filed

Apr 26, 2006

Status

Relief Denied

Judge

Hon. Tansil, Mark Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Tansil, Mark

Court

Superior

County

Sonoma County, CA

Practice Area

Probate

Matter Type

General Probate

Filed

Jan 06, 2010

Status

Dismissal

Judge

Hon. DeMeo, Bradford Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for DeMeo, Bradford

Court

Sonoma County

County

Sonoma County, CA

Practice Area

Probate

Matter Type

General Probate

View More Dockets

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope