Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
<< Previous Rule[ Back to Title Index ]Next Rule >>Â Â Â Â | Â Â Â Â Â Printer-friendly version of this page2024 California Rules of Court
Standard 10.70. Implementation and coordination of mediation and other alternative dispute resolution (ADR) programs
(a) Implementation of mediation programs for civil cases
Superior courts should implement mediation programs for civil cases as part of their core operations.
(Subd (a) adopted effective January 1, 2006.)
(b) Promotion of ADR programs
Superior courts should promote the development, implementation, maintenance, and expansion of successful mediation and other alternative dispute resolution (ADR) programs, through activities that include:
(1) Â Establishing appropriate criteria for determining which cases should be referred to ADR, and what ADR processes are appropriate for those cases. These criteria should include whether the parties are likely to benefit from the use of the ADR process;
(2) Â Developing, refining, and using lists of qualified ADR neutrals;
(3) Â Adopting appropriate criteria for referring cases to qualified ADR neutrals;
(4) Â Developing ADR information and providing educational programs for parties who are not represented by counsel; and
(5) Â Providing ADR education for judicial officers.
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2007; adopted as unlettered subdivision effective July 1, 1992; lettered and amended effective January 1, 2006.)
(c) Coordination of ADR programs
Superior courts should coordinate ADR promotional activities and explore joint funding and administration of ADR programs with each other and with professional and community-based organizations.
(Subd (c) adopted effective January 1, 2006.)
ADUNOMOON INN SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Oct-22-2009 5:58 pm Case Number: CUD-09-631209 Filing Date: Oct-22-2009 5:56 Juke Box: 001 Image: 02653038 COMPLAINT SFGC ASSOCIATES, LLC vs. JEWELERS INC et al 001€02653038 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.SURMIONS CITACION JUDICIAL) UNLAWFUL DETAINER—EVICTION (RETENCION ILICITA DE UN INMUEBLE—DESALOJO) NOTICE TO DEFENDANT: (Aviso at PEMANDADO): ESIG…
Oct 22, 2009
San Francisco County, CA
Oct 22, 2009
UNLAWFUL DETAINER - COMMERCIAL
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.