Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
7923.105. Â
The court shall decide the case after the court does all of the following:
(a)Â Examine the record in camera, if permitted by subdivision (b) of Section 915 of the Evidence Code.
(b)Â Examine any papers filed by the parties.
(c)Â Consider any oral argument and additional evidence as the court may allow.
Thus, under section 7923.105(a) in camera inspection of the record in question is not required as a matter of law, but is trusted to the sound discretion of the trial court. Id . ( quoting Yarish v. Nelson , (1972)) 27 Cal.App.3d 893, 904). There are circumstances where it is self-evident that the information sought to be protected is covered by the privilege. Torres v. Superior Court , (2000) 80 Cal.App.4th 867, 873.
MICHAEL J. AGUIRRE VS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES
22STCP03428
Apr 02, 2024
Los Angeles County, CA
Thus, under section 7923.105(a) in camera inspection of the record in question is not required as a matter of law, but is trusted to the sound discretion of the trial court. Id . ( quoting Yarish v. Nelson , (1972)) 27 Cal.App.3d 893, 904). There are circumstances where it is self-evidence that the information sought to be protected is covered by the privilege. Torres v. Superior Court , (2000) 80 Cal.App.4th 867, 873.
TIMOTHY RYAN, M.D. VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
23STCP00841
Mar 28, 2024
Los Angeles County, CA
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.