Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
3543.5.
It is unlawful for a public school employer to do any of the following:
(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, “employee” includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.
(b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.
(c) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with an exclusive representative. Knowingly providing an exclusive representative with inaccurate information, whether or not in response to a request for information, regarding the financial resources of the public school employer constitutes a refusal or failure to meet and negotiate in good faith.
(d) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.
(e) Refuse to participate in good faith in the impasse procedure set forth in Article 9 (commencing with Section 3548).
The court reasoned the refusal to pay the claimed wages was based on a dispute over interpretation of a statute and “does not necessitate a conclusion that it is also an ‘unfair practice’ within the meaning of Government Code section 3543.5.” Defendant’s attempt to characterize plaintiffs’ breach of contract claims as defendant’s “unilateral change” in the employment agreements is unpersuasive.
MOSS, ET AL. V. COUNTY OF TULARE
VCU 273682
Aug 13, 2018
Tulare County, CA
e _ [5205 Gordon Avenue || PLAINTIFF, IN PRO PER Gautam Manandhar BI Cerrito, California 94530 }(510)508-9510 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIF 'ORNIA. FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA Gautam Manandhar, ) Case No.: C15-02088 ) , Plaintiff, ) SECOND REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ) NOTICE IN OPPOSITION TO IFPTE’S v. ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT, : ) OR ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY (INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF ) ADJUDICATION OF ISSUES PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL ) ENGINEERS LOCAL 21, RICHMOND ) Date: CHA…
Nov 16, 2015
JUDGMENT 10/03/2018
oo —s Metrazyayy oo : 3021977* — WY DONALD LISA …
Jan 22, 2004
Alameda County, CA
Mar 08, 2004
Unlimited Civil (Other Employment Complaint Case)
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO DATE/TIME | September 8, 2023, 1:30 p.m. DEPT. NO | 36 JUDGE HON. STEPHEN ACQUISTO CLERK B. POLLOCK REBECCA WU, Case No. 34-2023-80004092 Petitioner, V. FILED HENDORSED…
Mar 13, 2023
Sacramento County, CA
Sep 07, 2023
Unlimited Civil
FILED/ENDORSED Rebecca Wu SEP 1 9 2023 PO BOX 543 APPLEGATE, CA 95703 By: L Deputy Clerk NY 916…
Mar 13, 2023
Sacramento County, CA
Sep 19, 2023
Unlimited Civil
TED NENDORSED| Sloan R. Simmons, SBN 233752 Davis C. Adams, SBN 331603 SEP 28 2023 …
Mar 13, 2023
Sacramento County, CA
Sep 28, 2023
Unlimited Civil
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.