California Laws|Section 1798.90.05.

                                                

1798.90.05.  

Section 1798.90 does not make it unlawful for a law enforcement entity subject to Section 2000aa of Title 42 of the United States Code to obtain a search warrant for the personal information of a user pursuant to otherwise applicable law in connection with the investigation or prosecution of a criminal offense when probable cause exists to believe that the person possessing the personal information has committed, or is committing, a criminal offense involving the production,
possession, receipt, mailing, sale, distribution, shipment, or transportation of child pornography, the sexual exploitation of children, or the sale or purchase of children prohibited by Sections 2251, 2251A, 2252, and 2252A of Title 18 of the United States Code. Nothing in Section 1798.90 shall prevent a provider from complying with a proper search warrant issued by a duly authorized court in connection with the investigation or prosecution of any of those offenses.

(Added by Stats. 2011, Ch. 424, Sec. 1. (SB 602) Effective January 1, 2012.)

View Latest Rulings

Instead, it provides that a government entity may not access any persons electronic data unless it receives a warrant, wiretap order, or an order for electronic reader records under Civil Code section 1798.90. (Penal Code § 1546.1(b).)

  • Name

    DORIS PENICHE VS CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, ET AL.

  • Case No.

    20STCV18935

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2023

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

View More Rulings
Previous Section

Doc thumbnail Section 1798.90.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 194 pages

oO ee YN DH HA FW YW PNY YY NR NN NY Se Be eB ee Be Be Be eo nN Dn HM F BW NH KF OGD OD me DN DH FB Ww PY KY S Nick Miletak — In Pro Se 14745 Conway Avenue San Jose, California 95124 Clerk of t 408-533-5689-mobile pitter Cou oar, COUN can nmiletak@msn.com —Frsaneyag—ObPuTy SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT DOWNTOWN BRANCH NICK MILETAK, CASE NO.: 22CV404562 Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF HIS vs. OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MANPOWER GROUP US, _INC’S., MANPOWE…

Case Filed

Oct 14, 2022

Case Status

Active

County

Santa Clara County, CA

Filed Date

Nov 21, 2022

Category

Other Complaint (Not Spec) Unlimited (42)

preview-icon 404 pages

1 CELIA W. LEE, State Bar # 172981 clee@goldfarblipman.com 2 RYE P. MURPHY, State Bar # 289427 rmurphy@goldfarblipman.com ELECTRONICALLY 3 GOLDFARB & LIPMAN LLP F I L E D …

County

San Francisco County, CA

Filed Date

Nov 03, 2020

Category

BUSINESS TORT

Judge Hon. ETHAN P. SCHULMAN Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for ETHAN P. SCHULMAN
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope