California Code of Regulations|Appendix B - , version 5

                                                

Sloping and Benching

(a) Scope and application. This appendix contains specifications for sloping and benching when used as methods of protecting employees working in excavations from cave-ins. The requirements of this appendix apply when the design of sloping and benching protective systems is to be performed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section 1541.1(b).
(b) Definitions.

Actual slope means the slope to which an excavation face is excavated.

Distress means that the soil is in a condition where a cave-in is imminent or is likely to occur. Distress is evidenced by such phenomena as the development of fissures in the face of or adjacent to an open excavation; the subsidence of the edge of an excavation; the slumping of material from the face or the bulging or heaving of material from the bottom of an excavation; the spalling of material from the face of an excavation; and ravelling, i.e., small amounts of material such as pebbles or little clumps of material suddenly separating from the face of an excavation and trickling or rolling down into the excavation.

Maximum allowable slope means the steepest incline of an excavation face that is acceptable for the most favorable site conditions as protection against cave-ins, and is expressed as the ratio of horizontal distance to vertical rise (H:V),

Short term exposure means a period of time less than or equal to 24 hours that an excavation is open.

(c) Requirements.
(1) Soil classification. Soil and rock deposits shall be classified in accordance with Appendix A to Section 1541.1.
(2) Maximum allowable slope. The maximum allowable slope for a soil or rock deposit shall be determined from Table B-1 of this appendix.
(3) Actual slope.
(A) The actual slope shall not be steeper than the maximum allowable slope.
(B) The actual slope shall be less steep than the maximum allowable slope, when there are signs of distress. If that situation occurs, the slope shall be cut back to an actual slope which is at least 1/2 horizontal to one vertical (1/2H:1V) less steep than the maximum allowable slope.
(C) When surcharge loads from stored material or equipment, operating equipment, or traffic are present, a competent person shall determine the degree to which the actual slope must be reduced below the maximum allowable slope, and shall assure that such reduction is achieved. Surcharge loads from adjacent structures shall be evaluated in accordance with Section 1541(i).
(4) Configurations. Configurations of sloping and benching systems shall be in accordance with Figure B-1.

TABLE B-1

MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SLOPES

Click here to view image.

FIGURE B-1

SLOPE CONFIGURATIONS

(All slopes stated below are in the horizontal to vertical ratio)

B - 1.1 Excavations made in Type A soil.

1.All simple slope excavations 20 feet or less in depth shall gave a maximum allowable slope of 3/4:1.

Click here to view image.

Simple Slope - General

Exception: Simple slope excavations which are open 24 hours or less (short term) and which are 12 feet or less in depth shall have a maximum allowable slope of 1/2:1.

Click here to view image.

Simple Slope - Short Term

2.All benched excavations 20 feet or less in depth shall have a maximum allowable slope of 3/4 to 1 and maximum bench dimensions as follows:

Click here to view image.

Simple Bench

Click here to view image.

Multiple Bench

3.All excavations 8 feet or less in depth which have unsupported vertically sided lower portions shall have a maximum vertical side 3 1/2 feet.

Click here to view image.

Unsupported Vertically Sided Lower Portion - Maximum 8 Feet in Depth

All excavations more than 8 feet but not more than 12 feet in depth with unsupported vertically sided lower portions shall have a maximum allowable slope of 1:1 and a maximum vertical side of 3 1/2 feet.

Click here to view image.

Unsupported Vertically Sided Lower Portion - Maximum 12 Feet in Depth

All excavations 20 feet or less in depth which have vertically sided lower portions that are supported or shielded shall have a maximum allowable slope of 3/4:1. The support or shield system must extend at least 18 inches above the top of the vertical side.

Click here to view image.

Supported or Shielded Vertically Sided Lower Portion

4.All other simple slope, compound slope, and vertically sided lower portion excavations shall be in accordance with the other options permitted under 1541.1(b).

B - 1.2 Excavations Made in Type B Soil

1.All simple slope excavations 20 feet or less in depth shall have a maximum allowable slope of 1:1.

Click here to view image.

Simple Slope

2.All benched excavations 20 feet or less in depth shall have a maximum allowable slope of 1:1 and maximum bench dimensions as follows:

Click here to view image.

Click here to view image.

Single Bench

Multiple Bench

3.All excavations 20 feet or less in depth which have vertically sided lower portions shall be shielded or supported to a height at least 18 inches above the top of the vertical side. All such excavations shall have a maximum allowable slope of 1:1.

Click here to view image.

Vertically Sided Lower Portion

4.All other sloped excavations shall be in accordance with the other options permitted in 1541.1(b).

B - 1.3 Excavations Made in Type C Soil

1.All simple slope excavations 20 feet or less in depth shall have a maximum allowable slope of 1 1/2:1.

Click here to view image.

Simple Slope

2.All excavations 20 feet or less in depth which have vertically sided lower portions shall be shielded or supported to a height at least 18 inches above the top of the vertical side. All such excavations shall have a maximum allowable slope of 1 1/2:1.

Click here to view image.

Vertically Sided Lower Portion

3.All other sloped excavations shall be in accordance with the other options permitted in 1541.1(b).

B - 1.4 Excavations Made in Layered Soil

B OVER A

1.All excavations 20 feet or less in depth made in layered soils shall have a maximum allowable slope for each layer as set forth below:

Click here to view image.

Click here to view image.

C OVER A

Click here to view image.

C OVER B

Click here to view image.

A OVER B

Click here to view image.

A OVER C

Click here to view image.

B OVER C

2.All other sloped excavations shall be in accordance with the other options permitted in 1541.1(b).

Notes

Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 8, 1541.1 app B

Note: Authority cited: Section 142.3, Labor Code. Reference: Section 142.3, Labor Code.

View Latest Rulings

The court requests a declaration from Counsel which clearly demonstrates Defendant was provided notice of default as required by section 5 of the Stipulation for Entry of Judgment. The 9-6-18 and 12-17-18 Arakawa declarations do not sufficiently establish that Plaintiff sent the notice to the email addresses listed in section 5.

  • Name

    EXPANSION CAPITAL GROUP, LLC V. GENESIS HEALTHCARE NETWORK, INC.

  • Case No.

    30-2016-00890872-CU-CL-CJC

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2019

Section 5.a.(3) and/or (4): One of these options needs to be marked. 2. Section 5.a.(7) and/or (8): One of these options needs to be marked. 3. Section 5.b.: Either "was" or "was not" needs to be marked. 4. Petition indicates there should be two pages attached, but no attachments were received, nor is it clear from the petition that any attachments were necessary. Please clarify if the indication that two pages should be attached is a typographical error.

  • Name

    IN THE MATTER OF ATAALLAH E AHARI

  • Case No.

    56-2015-00471888-PR-LA-OXN

  • Hearing

    Oct 21, 2015

VI section 5.A. will apply with the requested action. It does appear that the power to revoke or terminate the trust in whole (Art. VI section 5.C(1) subject to Art. VI section 5.A.) does apply despite the language in Art. VI section 6.D., page 15 (the specific distributions). Upon a Supplement discussing Art. VI, section 5.A., grant.

  • Name

    IN RE THE ROCKETT LIVING TRUST DTD. JANUARY 25, 2017

  • Case No.

    56-2020-00540871-PR-TR-OXN

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

Reading the waiver in section 5(i) in context, two conclusions are clear. First, the limitation of the waiver [u]ntil the Obligations are indefeasibly paid in full as stated in section 5(i) applied upon an election of remedies by Rosenthal. (Complaint, Ex. 5, section 5 at p. 3.) Section 5(i) is contained in section 5, which addresses a waiver of any claim or defense based upon an election of remedies by Rosenthal. Plaintiff did not allege an election of remedy by Rosenthal.

  • Name

    ISAAC COHEN VS DANIEL BOBROFF, ET AL.

  • Case No.

    21STCV24129

  • Hearing

    Dec 09, 2021

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

Section 5 of the form lists the following statutes as supporting the claim of exemption as to the property listed in section 4: CCP 704.010; 704.060; 704.070; and 704.120. None of the statutes listed in section 5 of the claim form supports a claim of exemption as to the property listed in section 4 of the claim form.

  • Name

    NORTH COAST PROPERTIES, LLC VS. KONIG MOTORSPORTS

  • Case No.

    37-2012-00058725-CU-BC-NC

  • Hearing

    Mar 02, 2017

View More Rulings

View Latest Dockets

2 Files
Filed

Oct 17, 2019

Status

Judgment (Other)

Judge

Hon. McGuire, Rosemary Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for McGuire, Rosemary

Court

Superior

County

Fresno County, CA

Practice Area

Commercial

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

Filed

Mar 17, 2021

Status

Other

Judge

Hon. Samra Furbush Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Samra Furbush

Court

Superior

County

Riverside County, CA

Practice Area

Family

Matter Type

Divorce,Separation

57 Files
Filed

Dec 01, 2017

Status

Dismissal

Judge

Hon. Gaab, Kimberly Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Gaab, Kimberly

Court

Fresno County

County

Fresno County, CA

Practice Area

Commercial

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

Filed

Aug 09, 2018

Status

Default Judgment

Court

Fresno County

County

Fresno County, CA

Practice Area

Family

Matter Type

Divorce,Separation

8 Files
Filed

Apr 04, 2017

Status

Dismissal

Judge

Hon. Diaz, Monica Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Diaz, Monica

Court

Fresno County

County

Fresno County, CA

Practice Area

Torts

Matter Type

Automobile

View More Dockets

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 1 page

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO San Bernardino District 247 West 3rd St San Bernardino CA 92415 …

Case Filed

Oct 12, 2018

Case Status

Active

County

San Bernardino County, CA

Filed Date

Jun 17, 2021

Category

Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited

Judge Hon. Donald Alvarez Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Donald Alvarez
preview-icon 2 pages

ClV-1 00 ATrORNEY 0R PARTY WHHOUT ATTORNEY: STATE BARN031 551 2 FDR COURT uss ONLY NAME: Ryan B, Kalashian, Esq. FIRM NAME:Quin1an, Kershaw & Fanucchi, LLP 25 Merced Street STREET ADDRESS: 21 Fresno CITY: …

Case Filed

Sep 23, 2021

Case Status

Open

County

Fresno County, CA

Filed Date

Jul 07, 2022

Judge Hon. Brickey, Gabriel Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Brickey, Gabriel
preview-icon 1 page

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Fontana District 17780 Arrow Boulevard Fontana California 92335 …

Case Filed

Sep 07, 2022

Case Status

Judgment Entered

County

San Bernardino County, CA

Filed Date

Nov 01, 2022

Category

Small Claims > 12 Claims Filed

Judge Hon. Jay H. Robinson Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Jay H. Robinson
preview-icon 1 page

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Fontana District 17780 Arrow Boulevard Fontana California 92335 …

Case Filed

Sep 07, 2022

Case Status

Judgment Entered

County

San Bernardino County, CA

Filed Date

Nov 01, 2022

Category

Small Claims > 12 Claims Filed

Judge Hon. Robert Driessen Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Robert Driessen
preview-icon 1 page

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Fontana District 17780 Arrow Boulevard Fontana California 92335 …

Case Filed

Sep 07, 2022

Case Status

Judgment Entered

County

San Bernardino County, CA

Filed Date

Nov 01, 2022

Category

Small Claims > 12 Claims Filed

Judge Hon. Jay H. Robinson Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Jay H. Robinson
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope