Response: - OPPOSITION TO COMCASE DEF MOTION FOR ATTY FEES Due Date: Complete Date:

On May 6, 2009 an other civil complaint case was filed by A M E Manufacturing Corp, J & J Refrigeration Supply Inc, and Warehouse 1050 Corp, against City Of Mia, Comcast Cable Communications Etc, Comcast Cable Communications Holdings Et et al. represented by Daker, Angela D, Gamez, Carlos Humberto, and Perez, Luis N, in the jurisdiction of Miami-Dade County. Judge William Johnson presiding.

                        
Preview
Filing # 25006113 E-Filed 03/18/2015 08:28:14 AM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11" JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 09-36802 CA 11 WAREHOUSE 1050 CORP., ef al., Plaintiffs, ve WALTER J. WILLIAMS, ef ai., Defendants. / PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO COMCAST DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES Plaintiffs Warehouse 1050 Corp., J and J Refrigeration Supply, Inc., and Ame Manufacturing Corp. (collectively “Plaintiffs”), through undersigned counsel, respond to Comcast Defendants’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees (“Motion”) as follows: Introduction — Why Comeast’s Motion Should Be Denied! Florida law is clear that Fla. Stat. §768.79 and Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.442, which together govern offers of judgment, are penal in nature and must be strictly construed. Failure to comply with any of the specific requirements of the statute and rule mandates denial of a request for attorney’s fees and costs. As discussed further below, the Motion should be denied becaus…

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope