Brief filed: Reply memorandum to the plaintiffs' opposition to T&M Equipment 's motion for summary judgment Applies To: Barnes, Esq., Jonathan (Attorney) on behalf of T&M Equipment Corporation (Defendant)

Download Document Print Document

On October 17, 2016 an other negligence - personal injury / property damage case was filed by Woods, David A, and Woods, Kelly, represented by Daniel, Esq., Lee D, Ditusa, Esq., Robert A, and Mangini, Esq., Laura, against Aquadro & Cerruti, Inc., Daniel O' Connell'S Sons, Inc., Manafort Precision, Llc, T & M Equipment Corporation, and T&M Equipment Corporation, represented by Ahern, Jr., Esq., William F, Bagley, John G, Barnes, Esq., Jonathan et al. in the jurisdiction of Hampshire County. Judge Mark D. Mason presiding.

                        
						    Preview
                        
                        
                          47.3

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

HAMPSHIRE, SS. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1680CV00167

DAVID A. WOODS AND KELLY
woops,
Plaintiffs

ve

AQUADRO & CERRUITI, INC., DANIEL
O’CONNELL’S SONS, INC., AND T&M
EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
Defendants

and

HAMPSHIRE SUPERIOR COURT

DANIEL O’CONNELL’S SONS, INC.
Third-Party Plaintiff OCT 13 neg

v.

HARRY JEKANOWSK(I, JR.
MANAFORT PRECISION, LLC and CLERIOMABIBTR ATE
T&M EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
Third-Party Defendants

DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, T&M EQUIPMENT CORPORATION’S

REPLY MEMORANDUM TO THE PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO T&M EQUIPMENT
CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

 

Pursuant to Superior Court Rule 9A(a)(3), the Defendant/Third-Party
Defendant, T&M Equipment Corporation (“T&M”) hereby submits this Reply
Memorandum in response to the Plaintiffs’ Opposition to T&M’s Motion for Summary
Judgment in order to address the document the Plaintiffs have elected to attach to the
Joint Appendix as Exhibit 21.

The general rule…