ORDER DIRECTED TO PHIL NEAL WALKER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED(CCP 177.5)

On October 18, 2007 a fraud case was filed by Barish, Andrew M, Barish, Kathleen M, Barrager, Stephen et al. represented by Janssen, Howard Arthur, and Novich, Lee Jonathan, against Brooks 2006 Charitable Remainer Unitrust Dated, Brooks, Cahterine S.S., Brooks, Catherine S.S. et al. represented by Belway, Joel K, Dooling, John G, Lynch, David Bernard et al. in the jurisdiction of San Francisco County. Judge Curtis E.A. Karnow presiding.

                        
Preview
VICE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Mar-28-2012 9:28 am Case Number: CGC-07-468359 Filing Date: Mar-28-2012 9:27 Filed by: DANIAL LEMIRE Juke Box: 001 Image: 03553348 ORDER KATHLEEN M BARISH et al VS. STEVEN D BROOKS 001C03553348 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.San Francisco County Superior Court MAR 28 2012 CLEA OF AE COURT By: Lacy é Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO KATHLEEN BARISH, ET AL., Plaintiff, vs. STEVEN BROOKS, ET AL., Defendants. AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS Case No. CGC — 07-468359 ORDER DIRECTED TO PHIL NEAL WALKER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED (CCP § 177.5) On March 19, 2012 I issued a Memorandum Order which noted the apparent violation of one of my earlier orders by Phil Walker, who was acting as counsel for cross defendant Morton. On February 24, 2021, I had met in open court with the attorneys…

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope