Motion in Limine re: - #3 PRECLUDE DEFS FROM PRODUCING EVIDENCE; DECLARATION - BOND -v- CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Print

Download Document Print Document

On February 11, 2021 an other petition (not spec) unlimited case was filed by Bond, Rodney, against California Department Of Transportation, represented by Barrett, Michael John, in the jurisdiction of San Bernardino County. Judge Thomas S Garza presiding.

                        
						    Preview
                        
                        
                                             WILLIAM D. AUSMAN (SBN 197995)
                   GREGORY E. MARTIN (SBN 297648)
                   LAW OFFICES 0F WILLIAM AUSMM                                                   swam:            1   L   ED
                   8320   Mono ROAD
                                                            o"
                                                                                                   Own       gggﬁggggn
                                                                                                     BERMRDINO
                                                                                                               00932.3
                   ATASCADERO,     CA 93422                                                                                msmcr
                   Telephone:    805-466—4800                      scnuufn                                AUG 3 0 208
                   Facsimile:    8054664802
     ®®VOU1>§MNH




             …

Case Info

Case No.

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Thomas S Garza

Document Filed Date

August 30, 2023

Case Filing Date

February 11, 2021

County

San Bernardino County, CA

Status

Judgment Entered

Parties

Albright, Yee & Schmit, Apc Attorney
Bond, Rodney Petitioner
Barrett, Michael John Attorneys For Defendants
Bond, Kristy Plaintiff In 1st Supplemental Complaint
Bond, Rodney Plaintiff In 1st Supplemental Complaint
California Department Of Transportation Respondent
Caltrans Defendant In 1st Supplemental Complaint
Casey Hultin Attorneys For Plaintiffs
Clifton Albright Attorney
County Counsel Attorney
County Of San Bernardino Defendant In 1st Supplemental Complaint
Does 1-80 Defendant In 1st Supplemental Complaint
Does One Through Fifty Defendant In 3rd Cross Complaint
Edward Molkenbuhr Attorneys For Plaintiffs
Gregory Martin Attorney
Havens Injury Law Attorney
Javier Rivera Attorneys For Defendants
Law Offices Of William Ausman Attorney
Leon Bass Attorneys For Defendants
Matthew Marino Attorney
Michelle Blakemore Attorneys For Defendants
Patricia Cirucci Attorneys For Defendants
Roes 1 To 30 Defendant In 1st Cross Complaint
Roes 1-10 Defendant In 2nd Cross Complaint
State Of California Depat Of Transportation Attorney
San Bernardino County Defendant In 1st Supplemental Complaint
San Bernardino County Plaintiff In 1st Cross Complaint
Sarah Hafen Attorney
Sean Simpson Attorneys For Plaintiffs
Southern California Edison Defendant In 1st Cross Complaint
Southern California Edison Defendant In 1st Supplemental Complaint
Southern California Edison Defendant In 3rd Cross Complaint
Southern California Edison Company Plaintiff In 2nd Cross Complaint
State Of California Department Of Transportation Defendant In 2nd Cross Complaint
The People Of The State Of California Defendant In 2nd Cross Complaint
The People Of The State Of California Plaintiff In 3rd Cross Complaint
Trang Le Attorneys For Defendants

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Motion in Limine re: - #3 PRECLUDE DEFS FROM PRODUCING EVIDENCE; DECLARATION

Related Topics

Case Info

Parties