arrow left
arrow right
  • KAYTS TER-GEVORKYAN VS BOSSA NOVA INC. Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • KAYTS TER-GEVORKYAN VS BOSSA NOVA INC. Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/20/2020 04:33 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Miro,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Kenneth H. Yoon (State Bar No. 198443) Stephanie E. Yasuda (State Bar No. 265480) Brian G. Lee (State Bar No. 300990) One Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2200 Los Angeles, CA 90017 TELEPHONE NO.: (213) 612-0988 FAX NO. (Optional): (213) 947-1211 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ghernandez@yoonlaw.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff Kayts Ter-Gevorkyan SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Kayts Ter-Gevorkyan DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Bossa Nova, Inc. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: LIMITED CASE 19STCV43242 (Check one): [KJ UNLIMITED CASE D (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: November 5, 2020 Time: 8:30 Dept.: 24 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): [KJ Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Kenneth H. Yoon. INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. [KJ This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff Ter-Gevorkyan b. D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. [KJ All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in [KJ complaint cross-complaint D (Describe, including causes of action): This is a lawsuit under Labor Code § 2698 et seq. commonly known as the Private Attorney General Act of 2004 ("PAGA"). Plaintiff seeks civil penalties related to overtime, minimum wages, break violations, failure to pay all gratuities, unreimbursed business expenses, among other labor code violations. Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov