11-02-2009 - Response CV - DC0401100 - 1652917 - RESPONSE - DYER CRAIG vs. DYER CUSTOM INSTALLATIONDCX

Download Document Print Document

On February 11, 2004 a case was filed by Dyer, Craig, represented by Madden, Mitchell, Oncken, J Kevin, and Stauch, Thomas R, against Dyer Custom Installation Inc., Dyer, Debra, Dyer, Laurie et al. represented by Nowak, Matthew, Sewell, Paul C, and Thomas, Jacob, in the jurisdiction of Dallas County. Judge TOBOLOWSKY, EMILY presiding.

                        
						    Preview
                        
                        
                          8 .. °

CAUSE NO. 04-01100-M

  
 

CRAIG DYER,

Plaintiff
v.

DYER CUSTOM INSTALLATION, INC.
(DCI), JOSEPH GEETING, SUSAN
LAMBERT, LARRY DYER and
RICHARD GEETING

MOM MMMM Ma Mw

Defendants

DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

 

PRO PLUMBING & APPLIANCE IN THE DISTRICT COURT
INSTALLATION, INC. ffk/a DYER

CUSTOM INSTALLATION, INC.
Plaintiff,
vs. 298" JUDICIAL DISTRICT

CRAIG DYER, MELISA CONTRERAS
and THE ESTATE OF LARRY DYER

WM WAU TN PU UN WN a Ww

Defendants, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

CRAIG DYER’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DCI AND JOSEPH GEETING’S
TRADITIONAL AND NO EVIDENCE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AGAINST CRAIG DYER

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
COMES NOW, Craig Dyer (‘Dyer’) and files this Response in Opposition to DCI and

Joseph Geeting’s Traditional and No Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment Against

Craig Dyer and, in support, shows the Court as follows:

 

CRAIG DYER’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DCI AND JOSEPH GEETING’S TRADITIONAL AND

NO EVIDENCE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT…